MN/CA IX (MN) is a tumour-associated isoenzyme of the carbonic anhydrase family. Previous deletion analysis of the MN promoter established that protected regions (PRs) 1 and 2 are crucial for its transcriptional activity. Computer-assisted searching indicated putative binding sites for activator protein (AP) 2 and specificity protein (SP) 1 transcription factors, plus a CACCC box in PR1 and an AP1 site in PR2. PR1 produced four complexes in electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA) with HeLa nuclear extracts. Of these, three were completely competed with the SP1 and transforming growth factor-β retinoblastoma control-element CACCC box (RCE) probes, whereas the AP2 probe competed against the same three complexes partially. Supershift EMSA identified SP1 in the complex 1 and SP3 in the complexes 2 and 4. Point mutations in the SP1 site abrogated the PR1 function, while mutations affecting the overlapping CACCC box/AP2 site in PR1had minor effect on MN promoter activity. Block-replaced MN promoter mutants that had a consensus binding site (SP1 or AP2) or the RCE in place of PR1 demonstrated the stringent selectivity of the PR1 position as only the SP1 mutant reconstituted the MN promoter activity. The consensus SP1 probe generated the same SP1 and SP3 complexes as PR1 in EMSA; therefore we conclude that SP activity is both necessary and sufficient in the PR1 position. The critical role of AP1 in the PR2 position was confirmed by supershift of the PR2 complex with c-Fos antibody and markedly decreased activity of the construct with a mutated AP1 site. Detailed deletion analysis proved that PR1+PR2 account for 90% of the MN promoter activity, while neither PR1 nor PR2 on their own are sufficient for transactivation. Thus, synergistic co-operation between SP and AP1 factors bound to the adjacent PR1 and PR2, respectively, is necessary for MN transcriptional activity. The PR1+PR2 module also stimulated transcription from a heterologous promoter. The modulation of AP1 activity with PMA stimulated MN expression and activated the MN promoter, whereas inhibition of protein kinase C activity had no effect on MN expression in HeLa cells.

This content is only available as a PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.