Misfolding of PrPC (cellular prion protein) to β-strand-rich conformations constitutes a key event in prion disease pathogenesis. PrPC can undergo either of two constitutive endoproteolytic events known as α- and β-cleavage, yielding C-terminal fragments known as C1 and C2 respectively. It is unclear whether C-terminal fragments generated through α- and β-cleavage, especially C2, influence pathogenesis directly. Consequently, we compared the biophysical properties and neurotoxicity of recombinant human PrP fragments recapitulating α- and β-cleavage, namely huPrP-(112–231) (equating to C1) and huPrP-(90–231) (equating to C2). Under conditions we employed, huPrP-(112–231) could not be induced to fold into a β-stranded isoform and neurotoxicity was not a feature for monomeric or multimeric assemblies. In contrast, huPrP-(90–231) easily adopted a β-strand conformation, demonstrated considerable thermostability and was toxic to neurons. Synthetic PrP peptides modelled on α- and β-cleavage of the unique Y145STOP (Tyr145→stop) mutant prion protein corroborated the differential toxicity observed for recombinant huPrP-(112–231) and huPrP-(90–231) and suggested that the persistence of soluble oligomeric β-strand-rich conformers was required for significant neurotoxicity. Our results additionally indicate that α- and β-cleavage of PrPC generate biophysically and biologically non-equivalent C-terminal fragments and that C1 generated through α-cleavage appears to be pathogenesis-averse.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2014
- Cover Image
- PDF Icon PDF LinkFront Matter
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board
Research Article|
March 14 2014
C-terminal peptides modelling constitutive PrPC processing demonstrate ameliorated toxicity predisposition consequent to α-cleavage
Vanessa A. Johanssen
;
Vanessa A. Johanssen
*Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
†Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
‡Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy Johanssen
;
Timothy Johanssen
*Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
‡Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
§Mental Health Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Colin L. Masters
;
Colin L. Masters
§Mental Health Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew F. Hill
;
Andrew F. Hill
†Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
‡Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
§Mental Health Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin J. Barnham
;
Kevin J. Barnham
*Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
‡Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
§Mental Health Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven J. Collins
Steven J. Collins
1
*Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
§Mental Health Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
1To whom correspondence should be addressed (email stevenjc@unimelb.edu.au).
Search for other works by this author on:
Biochem J (2014) 459 (1): 103–115.
Article history
Received:
October 17 2013
Revision Received:
December 23 2013
Accepted:
January 20 2014
Accepted Manuscript online:
January 20 2014
Citation
Vanessa A. Johanssen, Timothy Johanssen, Colin L. Masters, Andrew F. Hill, Kevin J. Barnham, Steven J. Collins; C-terminal peptides modelling constitutive PrPC processing demonstrate ameliorated toxicity predisposition consequent to α-cleavage. Biochem J 1 April 2014; 459 (1): 103–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20131378
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Biochemical Society Member Sign in
Sign InSign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionGet Access To This Article
Cited By
Related Articles
In vitro studies of amyloid β-protein fibril assembly and toxicity provide clues to the aetiology of Flemish variant (Ala692→Gly) Alzheimer's disease
Biochem J (April,2001)
The Terminalia laxiflora modulates the neurotoxicity induced by fipronil in male albino rats
Biosci Rep (March,2019)
Epitope scanning indicates structural differences in brain-derived monomeric and aggregated mutant prion proteins related to genetic prion diseases
Biochem J (August,2013)
The hydrophobic core region governs mutant prion protein aggregation and intracellular retention
Biochem J (August,2010)