At mammalian fertilisation, the fundamental stimulus that triggers oocyte (egg) activation and initiation of early embryonic development is an acute rise of the intracellular-free calcium (Ca2+) concentration inside the egg cytoplasm. This essential Ca2+ increase comprises a characteristic series of repetitive Ca2+ oscillations, starting soon after sperm–egg fusion. Over the last 15 years, accumulating scientific and clinical evidence supports the notion that the physiological stimulus that precedes the cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations is a novel, testis-specific phospholipase C (PLC) isoform, known as PLC-zeta (PLCζ). Sperm PLCζ catalyses the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate triggering cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations through the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate signalling pathway. PLCζ is the smallest known mammalian PLC isoform with the most elementary domain organisation. However, relative to somatic PLCs, the PLCζ isoform possesses a unique potency in stimulating Ca2+ oscillations in eggs that is attributed to its novel biochemical characteristics. In this review, we discuss the latest developments that have begun to unravel the vital role of PLCζ at mammalian fertilisation and decipher its unique mechanism of action within the fertilising egg. We also postulate the significant potential diagnostic and therapeutic capacity of PLCζ in alleviating certain types of male infertility.
Review Article| October 23 2017
The role and mechanism of action of sperm PLC-zeta in mammalian fertilisation
2College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
3College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Comparative Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Search for other works by this author on:
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
Michail Nomikos, Junaid Kashir, F. Anthony Lai; The role and mechanism of action of sperm PLC-zeta in mammalian fertilisation. Biochem J 1 November 2017; 474 (21): 3659–3673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160521
Download citation file: