In this commentary on an article by Koval and Katanaev [Biochem. J. (2011) 433, 435–440], the following sentence (appearing on page e4, right-hand column, line 23) contained a typographical error. The corrected sentence appears here:

Rising to the occasion, these sleuths forged onward to identify and interrogate more ‘physiological’ contexts for studies aimed again at answering whether Fzs are bona fide GPCRs.