The migration of different cell types, such as leucocytes and tumour cells, involves cellular strategies to overcome the physical resistance of three-dimensional tissue networks, including proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. High-resolution live-cell imaging techniques have recently provided structural and biochemical insight into the differential use of matrix-degrading enzymes in the migration processes of different cell types within the three-dimensional ECM. Proteolytic migration is achieved by slow-moving cells, such as fibroblasts and mesenchymally moving tumour cells, by engaging matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsins and serine proteases at the cell surface in a focalized manner ('pericellular proteolysis'), while adhesion and migratory traction are provided by integrins. Pericellular breakdown of ECM components generates localized matrix defects and remodelling along migration tracks. In contrast with tumour cells, constitutive non-proteolytic migration is used by rapidly moving T lymphocytes. This migration type does not generate proteolytic matrix remodelling, but rather depends on shape change to allow cells to glide and squeeze through gaps and trails present in connective tissues. In addition, constitutive proteolytic migration can be converted into non-proteolytic movement by protease inhibitors. After the simultaneous inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases, serine/threonine proteases and cysteine proteases in tumour cells undergoing proteolysis-dependent movement, a fundamental adaptation towards amoeboid movement is able to sustain non-proteolytic migration in these tumour cells (the mesenchymal-amoeboid transition). Instead of using proteases for matrix degradation, the tumour cells use leucoyte-like strategies of shape change and squeezing through matrix gaps along tissue scaffolds. The diversity of protease function in cell migration by different cell types highlights response diversity and molecular adaptation of cell migration upon pharmacotherapeutic protease inhibitor treatment.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2003
Issue Editors
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
- PDF Icon PDF LinkFront Matter
Conference Article|
September 01 2003
Proteolytic and non-proteolytic migration of tumour cells and leucocytes
Peter Friedl;
Peter Friedl
1
1Cell Migration Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
1To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail [email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
Katarina Wolf
Katarina Wolf
1Cell Migration Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Portland Press Ltd
Online ISSN: 1744-1439
Print ISSN: 0067-8694
© 2003 The Biochemical Society
2003
Biochem Soc Symp (2003) 70: 277–285.
Citation
Jeremy Saklatvala, Hideaki Nagase, Guy Salvesen, Peter Friedl, Katarina Wolf; Proteolytic and non-proteolytic migration of tumour cells and leucocytes. Biochem Soc Symp 1 September 2003; 70 277–285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bss0700277
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Biochemical Society Member Sign in
Sign InSign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionGet Access To This Article
Related Articles
Diverse roles of non-muscle myosin II contractility in 3D cell migration
Essays Biochem (September,2019)
Cell migration on microposts with surface coating and confinement
Biosci Rep (February,2019)
Membrane dynamics in cell migration
Essays Biochem (July,2019)