mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) is a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase that has roles in cell metabolism, cell growth and cell survival. Although it has been known for some years that mTOR acts as a hub for inputs from growth factors (in particular insulin and insulin-like growth factors), nutrients and cellular stresses, some of the mechanisms involved are still poorly understood. Recent work has implicated mTOR in a variety of important human pathologies, including cancer, Type 2 diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders, heightening interest and accelerating progress in dissecting out the control and functions of mTOR.
The timely ‘mTOR Signalling, Nutrients and Disease’ meeting brought together groups with shared interests in the regulation and effects of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase with roles in cell metabolism, cell growth and cell survival (Figure 1). Although, for some years, it has been known that mTOR acts as a hub for inputs from growth factors (in particular insulin and insulin-like growth factors), nutrients and cellular stresses, some of the mechanisms involved are still poorly understood. Recent work implicating mTOR in a variety of important human pathologies, including cancer, Type 2 diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders has heightened interest and accelerated progress in dissecting out the control and functions of mTOR. An important goal of this meeting was to bring together individuals approaching the key problems from very different perspectives. In particular, discussion of work addressing the role of nutrient sensors and transporters in mTOR regulation brought a novel flavour to this TOR (target of rapamycin)-centric meeting, which was welcomed by many delegates. The meeting was divided into three sessions, all intimately linked: ‘Insulin/TOR signalling and translational control’, ‘Nutrient regulation of mTOR’ and ‘The mTOR signalling pathway: physiology, pathology and treatments’. The scientific programme resulted in a lively and interactive meeting with extensive discussion following talks and also around posters. It was especially useful in raising some of the remaining questions that have yet to be fully addressed and in highlighting recent work that may ultimately help to provide several of the answers. Since the discovery of TOR proteins in yeast by Michael Hall and colleagues in the early 1990s working in Basel, more than 3000 papers on mTOR have been published; moreover, as Michael Hall indicated in his excellent introductory lecture, the literature is still expanding exponentially. It is only the newer areas covered at this meeting that are very briefly reviewed here.
mTOR signalling, nutrients and disease
Cell-type-specific functions of the mTOR signalling cascade
Since mTOR plays two distinct functions in metabolism and growth factor signalling through TORC (TOR complex) 1 and TORC2, and has a critical role in endocrine functions in multicellular organisms, the ‘simple’ knockout studies in mice that have primarily been performed to date have not fully untangled the functional complexity of this molecule. Mike Hall described the first characterization of animals with conditional tissue-specific knockouts of the TORC1 component raptor (regulatory associated protein of TOR) and the TORC2 component rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of TOR), which highlighted complex endocrine interactions between different tissues . There is little doubt that these types of study will complement work, such as that described by Brendan Manning , Joe Avruch  and Chris Proud  where the roles of insulin and mTOR signalling components are dissected in cell lines or cultured cells derived from mutant mice.
The cell biology of amino-acid-dependent TOR activation
Recent work from the Sabatini laboratory presented by Yasemin Sancak has revealed that, in HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293T cells, mTOR is shuttled to Rab7-containing late endosomes in the presence of activating extracellular amino acids, suggesting that this might be part of the activation mechanism . These late endosomes contain the upstream growth-factor-regulated G-protein Rheb, which synergizes with amino acids in cultured cells to maximally activate mTOR. This study has not only indicated that the endosomal system is important in amino-acid-dependent TOR activation, but also emphasized how critical it will be in the future to consider the subcellular control of TOR and its activities. It will be interesting to see whether AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) discussed by Grahame Hardie [6,7] and Ruben Shaw , or the hypoxic conditions described by Celeste Simon  are involved in regulating the same or a different pool of mTOR.
Amino acid sensing and mTOR regulation
Several recent studies in cell culture have put forward different molecules as sensors for amino acids involved in mTOR activation. These include MAP4K3 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3) , Vps34 (vacuolar protein sorting 34), a lipid kinase controlling phosphoinositide metabolism [11,12], and Rags (Ras-related GTPases) . Speakers at the meeting put forward several other candidates. For example, EglN prolyl hydroxylases are inactivated by reduced levels of 2-oxoglutarate (α-ketoglutarate) that are associated with amino acid starvation, and Raúl Durán suggested that this inactivation is important in loss of mTOR activity . Activity of the p38 stress-activated MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway was also shown by Megan Cully to play a role in activating mTOR in fruitflies and cell culture . And our own laboratories presented work supporting a role for the PATs (proton-assisted amino acid transporters) as TOR-activating amino acid sensors . Since these transporters can function in endosomal compartments, this study correlated well with the findings of Yasemin Sancak, who showed that Rags are required for amino-acid-dependent mTOR activation and shuttling of mTOR to endosomes . It will be interesting to determine whether the Rags and PATs work via a common mechanism.
Another interesting aspect of the meeting related to the discussion of mechanism by which molecules that look like amino acid transporters might signal intracellularly. Both work from the Goberdhan and Boyd laboratories on the PATs  and from Peter Taylor's laboratory on another amino acid transporter family, the SNATs (sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter) , has indicated that some of these molecules may not need to transport to activate their targets, acting as so-called transceptors. Clearly establishing the signalling mechanism involved is a priority, and Per Ljungdahl gave a comprehensive demonstration of how this had been achieved in yeast for the SPS amino acid sensor . Furthermore, Manuel Palacín described a structure–function analysis of the heterodimeric amino acid transporters , illustrating how a detailed structural analysis of transporters as well as a determination of the substrate binding and specificity of novel classes of transceptor are likely to inform our understanding of mechanism and perhaps allow design of new inhibitory drugs. It will also be important to find out how the levels of amino acid transporters are regulated and whether these levels can be modulated. Aimee Edinger presented evidence suggesting that ceramide, which has been shown to down-regulate nutrient permeases in yeast, also induces autophagy with potential therapeutic applications for targeting cancer cells . The significance of tissue-specific amino acid transporters to normal human development was also aired by Sara Roos, e.g. in the placenta .
What pathways work downstream of TORC1?
Classically, TORC1 links to pathways and molecules controlling mRNA translation, such as S6K (S6 kinase) and the 4E-BP (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein). However, TORC1's inhibitory effects on autophagy also affect the response of cells to amino acids. Tom Neufeld presented recent data dissecting out the roles of different Atg genes in the autophagy process that indicated more complexity in the fusion and protein shuttling events involved than had been suspected previously . Furthermore, Almut Schulze described a role for TORC1-dependent SREBP (sterol-regulatory-element-binding protein) accumulation in the nucleus in mediating the growth-promoting effects of mTOR and growth factor signalling . SREBP is necessary for increased lipid biosynthesis required for cell growth, and thus this work implies that this neglected aspect of mTOR function will be as important to study as the protein translational mechanisms that have been analysed extensively in the past. In addition, Janni Petersen presented data from fission yeast linking TOR signalling to mitotic commitment in response to nutrient availability .
Is drugging the TOR pathway useful therapeutically?
Julian Sampson and Michel Maira presented pre-clinical and/or early-phase human trials indicating that inhibiting mTOR might be effective in treating a range of TSC (tuberous sclerosis complex)-associated tumours, and that there were likely to be advantages in inhibiting both PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) and TOR in some cancer therapies [24,25]. Not only was it gratifying to hear that work that has developed from combined studies in model organisms as diverse as yeast, fruitflies, mice and humans is now influencing treatment strategies, but also, importantly, these studies highlighted the point that further intensive study of the mTOR control and downstream signalling mechanism, such as that described in the rest of the meeting, was likely to drive further progress in the clinic in the not-too-distant future. The reviews that follow will hopefully illustrate where future breakthroughs may emerge.
Work on nutrient sensing from the D.C.I.G. and C.A.R.B. groups in currently supported by Cancer Research Technology [grant number C19591/A9093], Cancer Research UK [grant numbers C7713/A6174 and C19591/A6181] and previously by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.
mTOR Signalling, Nutrients and Disease: Biochemical Society Focused Meeting held at Medical Sciences Teaching Centre, University of Oxford, U.K., 15–16 September 2008. Organized and Edited by Richard Boyd (Oxford, U.K.), Deborah Goberdhan (Oxford, U.K.) and Richard Lamb (Cancer Research UK, London, U.K.).
AMP-activated protein kinase
eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein
mammalian target of rapamycin
proton-assisted amino acid transporter
regulatory associated protein of target of rapamycin
rapamycin-insensitive companion of target of rapamycin
target of rapamycin