The endosomal system is essential for the intra- and intercellular communication in cells and multicellular organisms. It is involved in the secretion of signaling factors and serves as a venue for signaling receptors from the plasma membrane, which are endocytosed after ligand binding. Many internalized receptor–ligand complexes and numerous other endocytosed proteins arrive at the Rab5-positive early endosome, where they will be sorted. Cargoes marked with ubiquitin are bound by endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-0 and ESCRT-I complexes to initiate their degradation. The remaining cargoes are recycled back to the plasma membrane or the trans-Golgi network. To degrade ubiquitinated cargoes, the early endosome has to mature into a late endosomal structure, the multivesicular body (MVB). This procedure requires the Rab5-to-Rab7 conversion, mediated by the RABEX5-MON1/CCZ1 RabGEF cascade. Moreover, cargoes destined for degradation have to be packaged into intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) through ESCRT-III and Vps4. The matured late endosome or MVB finally fuses with a lysosome to degrade the cargo. Although ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion are well-characterized processes during endosome maturation, it remained until recently unclear whether these processes are connected. Lately, several studies were published illuminating the relationship of ESCRT functions and Rab conversion. Here, we review the current knowledge on the role of the ESCRT machinery in cargo degradation and RABEX5 regulation and MON1/CCZ1-mediated Rab conversion during endosome maturation. Moreover, we propose a model on the regulatory role of ESCRT functions during endosome maturation.

Co-ordinating a long to-do list during endosome maturation

Endosome maturation is a highly dynamic process in the endosomal system, which sorts and delivers cargoes received from the plasma membrane . During this process, early endosomes transform into late endosomes that fuse with a lysosome to degrade cargoes [1,2,3]. Early endosomes, which are Rab5 positive, have a close-to-neutral pH and exhibit a high amount of cargo and PI(3)P. During their maturation they will change their properties, morphology and localization in the cell. They tend to move during their maturation from the cell periphery to the center [4]. The emerging late endosomes are Rab7 positive and have a more acidic pH. They are characterized by a low amount of cargo on the limiting membrane, high levels of PI(3,5)P2, and a high number of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside [5,6]. These changes require several processes to take place: Rab conversion [5,7], acidification of the endosomal lumen [8], cargo sorting [9,10], ILV formation [11], cargo recycling [12,13], phosphosinositide phosphate (PIP) conversion [14], membrane tethering [5,15], and endosome motility [16] (Figure 1). Studies performed in our group demonstrated that endosomal acidification depends on Rab conversion, that Rab11-dependent recycling of cargo occurs before and after Rab conversion, and that efficient cargo sorting on the sorting endosome requires factors for endosome recycling and Rab interactions (FERARI) and a kiss-and-run mechanism [18-20]. In addition, the vacuolar tethering complex, homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) might be involved in the regulation of Rab conversion [21,22]. Furthermore, ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion are co-ordinated through at least four mechanisms: 1. endosomal cargo abundance, 2. the deubiquitinase of the ESCRT machinery USP8 which regulates the endosomal localization and activity of RABEX5, 3. His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase (HD-PTP) (an associated ESCRT factor) that binds to several ESCRT factors and RABAPTIN5, and 4. the binding of MON1/CCZ1 to PI(3)P and the subsequent displacement of RABEX5 [17,23-25] (Figures 1B and 2). For clarity, we will use the Homo sapiens nomenclature throughout this review; please consult Table 1 for alternative names in other species.

Unified model of ESCRT functions regulating the progression of endosome maturation.

Figure 1:
Unified model of ESCRT functions regulating the progression of endosome maturation.

Hypothesis for co-ordination between Rab conversion and ILV formation by ESCRT during endosome maturation. Overall mechanisms such as recycling (right), ILV formation, and Rab5 to Rab7 exchange (left) are shown by large arrows or gradients. Recycling will proceed throughout the first stages of endosome maturation lasting into late endosomes (indicated by tubular structures). ILVs will accumulate until their degradation in endolysosomes. The surface of endosomes will be covered either with Rab5 (shown by a green outline) on early endosomes or Rab7 (magenta outlines) on late endosomes and lysosomal structures. The right part of the endosomes shows the ESCRT progression, while the left part shows the parallel events pertaining to Rab conversion and RABEX5. Early endosomal membranes contain large amounts of cargo (either for recycling or degradation) that will be progressively removed during maturation. The ESCRT machinery will proceed from cargo corralling (ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I in purple and orange) to filament and ILV formation (ESCRT-III and Vps4) (transition by ESCRT-II is not shown for simplicity). In the left part of the model, RABEX5 is active as a Rab5 GEF with the help of RABAPTIN5. After cargo removal and PI(3)P concentration reach a critical level, RABEX5 is removed from the endosome by 1. losing its binding to ubiquitinated cargo, 2. being deubiquitinated by USP8, 3. having RABAPTIN5 removed through binding of HD-PTP and 4. MON1/CCZ1 binding to its membrane binding domain. The MON1/CCZ1 complex also activates Rab7 on the membrane to replace Rab5. On the late endosome, late ESCRTs will finish ILV formation, the last recycling cargo will be removed, and MON1/CCZ1 will dissociate from the membrane and the HOPS tethering complex will be recruited. When all these tasks are finished and sufficient PI(3,5)P2 is accumulated on the membrane, fusion with the lysosome will occur, leading to degradation of the contents followed by endocytic lysosome reformation (ELR) (modified from [2,17]). ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Figure 1:
Unified model of ESCRT functions regulating the progression of endosome maturation.

Hypothesis for co-ordination between Rab conversion and ILV formation by ESCRT during endosome maturation. Overall mechanisms such as recycling (right), ILV formation, and Rab5 to Rab7 exchange (left) are shown by large arrows or gradients. Recycling will proceed throughout the first stages of endosome maturation lasting into late endosomes (indicated by tubular structures). ILVs will accumulate until their degradation in endolysosomes. The surface of endosomes will be covered either with Rab5 (shown by a green outline) on early endosomes or Rab7 (magenta outlines) on late endosomes and lysosomal structures. The right part of the endosomes shows the ESCRT progression, while the left part shows the parallel events pertaining to Rab conversion and RABEX5. Early endosomal membranes contain large amounts of cargo (either for recycling or degradation) that will be progressively removed during maturation. The ESCRT machinery will proceed from cargo corralling (ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I in purple and orange) to filament and ILV formation (ESCRT-III and Vps4) (transition by ESCRT-II is not shown for simplicity). In the left part of the model, RABEX5 is active as a Rab5 GEF with the help of RABAPTIN5. After cargo removal and PI(3)P concentration reach a critical level, RABEX5 is removed from the endosome by 1. losing its binding to ubiquitinated cargo, 2. being deubiquitinated by USP8, 3. having RABAPTIN5 removed through binding of HD-PTP and 4. MON1/CCZ1 binding to its membrane binding domain. The MON1/CCZ1 complex also activates Rab7 on the membrane to replace Rab5. On the late endosome, late ESCRTs will finish ILV formation, the last recycling cargo will be removed, and MON1/CCZ1 will dissociate from the membrane and the HOPS tethering complex will be recruited. When all these tasks are finished and sufficient PI(3,5)P2 is accumulated on the membrane, fusion with the lysosome will occur, leading to degradation of the contents followed by endocytic lysosome reformation (ELR) (modified from [2,17]). ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Close modal

Co-ordination of RABEX5 localization and ESCRT machinery during cargo corralling and ILV formation.

Figure 2:
Co-ordination of RABEX5 localization and ESCRT machinery during cargo corralling and ILV formation.

(A) Domain structure of RABEX5. The domains correspond to the same-colored domains in (B). Ubiquitin-binding domains (consisting of a Zink Finger and an additional ubiquitin-binding motif) are shown in red, membrane binding domains (with helical bundle [HB]) are in brown (they can be bound by MON1), GEF domain and coiled-coil domain are colored in green. (B) Hypothetical co-ordination model of Rab conversion and ESCRT-mediated ILV formation during endosome maturation. General concentration of different factors is indicated on the sides to underscore the progression through the maturation process. On the left, Rab5 (green) will be replaced by Rab7 (magenta), with a period of time where both can be found on endosomes (white). On the right: PI(3)P will accumulate and then decrease again on late endosomes (purple bar), free ubiquitinated cargo will decrease and be packed into ILVs (red bar), RABEX5 will be removed from endosomes (green bar) and MON1/CCZ1 will only be present for a short time as indicated (dark brown bar). The progression through endosome maturation is shown in four steps (I–IV). I. Early endosome with high levels of recycling cargo and ubiquitinated cargo for degradation. On the left side, recruited RABEX5 is shown binding to ubiquitinated cargo and directly to the membrane. RABAPTIN5 is binding to the coiled-coil region of RABEX5 and activating its GEF activity to recruit Rab5. RABEX5 is also ubiquitinated (red dot), which increases its affinity to endosomal membranes. On the right side, ESCRT-0 is binding to ubiquitinated cargo. Its recruitment is aided by the recognition of PI(3)P. HD-PTP binds to ESCRT-0 through its Bro1 domain. II. Cargo corralling is increased by the presence of ESCRT-I that contains additional binding sites for ubiquitinated cargo. While TSG101 is directly recruited by HRS (in ESCRT-0), it is also bound by HD-PTP through the coiled-coil domain. The positive feedback loop keeping Rab5 firmly activated is depicted on the left side. III. Maturing endosome shows USP8 deubiquitinating RABEX5, which will lead to a loss of association with the endosomal membrane. Moreover, USP8 attracts MON1/CCZ1. USP8 is also involved in later steps of ILV formation as indicated by a dashed line arrow pointing to the right. At this point, most of the recycling cargo will be gone and the degradation cargo will begin to be packed into late ESCRT filament structures (shown on the right). ESCRT-II will be recruited and in turn start filament formation of CHMP6 and CHMP4 (ESCRT-III). This filament will now be bound by the Bro1 domain of HD-PTP. ESCRT-0 might by this point have left the assembly. The later replacement of the CHMP4 filament with a CHMP3/CHMP2 filament will release the Bro1 domain, which will then be able to bind RABAPTIN5 as indicated by the dashed line arrow pointing to the left. IV. Late endosome membranes will contain very little recycling cargo and almost no ubiquitinated degradation cargo. Cargo for degradation will be mostly moved into forming or finished ILVs and is deubiquitinated by USP8. The binding of RABEX5 to this cargo will not be possible any more. Deubiquitination by USP8 will have destabilized RABEX5 further. Additionally, HD-PTP binding to RABAPTIN5 will reduce the GEF activity of RABEX5, interrupting the positive feedback loop with Rab5 to keep RABEX5 on the membrane. Last but not least, the high PI(3)P concentration on the membrane will enhance the recruitment of MON1/CCZ1, which also binds to the HB of RABEX5 and displaces the adjacent membrane binding domain to fully remove RABEX5 from endosomal membranes. Rab7 will be activated and recruited onto the membrane by the GEF activity of CCZ1, and a late endosome environment will be established (Figure combined from [17,23,24,26]). ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; HD-PTP, His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Figure 2:
Co-ordination of RABEX5 localization and ESCRT machinery during cargo corralling and ILV formation.

(A) Domain structure of RABEX5. The domains correspond to the same-colored domains in (B). Ubiquitin-binding domains (consisting of a Zink Finger and an additional ubiquitin-binding motif) are shown in red, membrane binding domains (with helical bundle [HB]) are in brown (they can be bound by MON1), GEF domain and coiled-coil domain are colored in green. (B) Hypothetical co-ordination model of Rab conversion and ESCRT-mediated ILV formation during endosome maturation. General concentration of different factors is indicated on the sides to underscore the progression through the maturation process. On the left, Rab5 (green) will be replaced by Rab7 (magenta), with a period of time where both can be found on endosomes (white). On the right: PI(3)P will accumulate and then decrease again on late endosomes (purple bar), free ubiquitinated cargo will decrease and be packed into ILVs (red bar), RABEX5 will be removed from endosomes (green bar) and MON1/CCZ1 will only be present for a short time as indicated (dark brown bar). The progression through endosome maturation is shown in four steps (I–IV). I. Early endosome with high levels of recycling cargo and ubiquitinated cargo for degradation. On the left side, recruited RABEX5 is shown binding to ubiquitinated cargo and directly to the membrane. RABAPTIN5 is binding to the coiled-coil region of RABEX5 and activating its GEF activity to recruit Rab5. RABEX5 is also ubiquitinated (red dot), which increases its affinity to endosomal membranes. On the right side, ESCRT-0 is binding to ubiquitinated cargo. Its recruitment is aided by the recognition of PI(3)P. HD-PTP binds to ESCRT-0 through its Bro1 domain. II. Cargo corralling is increased by the presence of ESCRT-I that contains additional binding sites for ubiquitinated cargo. While TSG101 is directly recruited by HRS (in ESCRT-0), it is also bound by HD-PTP through the coiled-coil domain. The positive feedback loop keeping Rab5 firmly activated is depicted on the left side. III. Maturing endosome shows USP8 deubiquitinating RABEX5, which will lead to a loss of association with the endosomal membrane. Moreover, USP8 attracts MON1/CCZ1. USP8 is also involved in later steps of ILV formation as indicated by a dashed line arrow pointing to the right. At this point, most of the recycling cargo will be gone and the degradation cargo will begin to be packed into late ESCRT filament structures (shown on the right). ESCRT-II will be recruited and in turn start filament formation of CHMP6 and CHMP4 (ESCRT-III). This filament will now be bound by the Bro1 domain of HD-PTP. ESCRT-0 might by this point have left the assembly. The later replacement of the CHMP4 filament with a CHMP3/CHMP2 filament will release the Bro1 domain, which will then be able to bind RABAPTIN5 as indicated by the dashed line arrow pointing to the left. IV. Late endosome membranes will contain very little recycling cargo and almost no ubiquitinated degradation cargo. Cargo for degradation will be mostly moved into forming or finished ILVs and is deubiquitinated by USP8. The binding of RABEX5 to this cargo will not be possible any more. Deubiquitination by USP8 will have destabilized RABEX5 further. Additionally, HD-PTP binding to RABAPTIN5 will reduce the GEF activity of RABEX5, interrupting the positive feedback loop with Rab5 to keep RABEX5 on the membrane. Last but not least, the high PI(3)P concentration on the membrane will enhance the recruitment of MON1/CCZ1, which also binds to the HB of RABEX5 and displaces the adjacent membrane binding domain to fully remove RABEX5 from endosomal membranes. Rab7 will be activated and recruited onto the membrane by the GEF activity of CCZ1, and a late endosome environment will be established (Figure combined from [17,23,24,26]). ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; HD-PTP, His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Close modal

The ESCRT machinery at a glance.

Figure 3:
The ESCRT machinery at a glance.

A simplified overview of ILV formation by the ESCRT machinery in endosomes highlighting the possible roles of ESCRT in Rab conversion. The three main points of intersection between the two pathways are indicated (corresponding to Figure 1). The ESCRT complexes are arranged by their sequence of action from left to right. The whole machinery will most probably never be arranged in this way because early ESCRTs will leave, while late ESCRTs will only arrive later in the process (as shown in more detail in Figure 2B). All major ESCRT subunits are shown and color coded according to the complex they belong to (ESCRT-0 to Vps4) (see also Table 1). Ubiquitinated cargo is depicted (with a red UBQ). Binding domains (BD) for ubiquitin (UBQ-BD), PI(3)P (PI(3)P-BD and GLUE-D) and PI (3,5)P2 (PI(3,5)P2-BD) are depicted as domains belonging to the respective proteins. The red arrow shows cargo deubiquitination by USP8 (taken from [17]). Recruitment of ESCRT-III and Vps4 subunits corresponds approximately to the sequence shown from left to right. ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Figure 3:
The ESCRT machinery at a glance.

A simplified overview of ILV formation by the ESCRT machinery in endosomes highlighting the possible roles of ESCRT in Rab conversion. The three main points of intersection between the two pathways are indicated (corresponding to Figure 1). The ESCRT complexes are arranged by their sequence of action from left to right. The whole machinery will most probably never be arranged in this way because early ESCRTs will leave, while late ESCRTs will only arrive later in the process (as shown in more detail in Figure 2B). All major ESCRT subunits are shown and color coded according to the complex they belong to (ESCRT-0 to Vps4) (see also Table 1). Ubiquitinated cargo is depicted (with a red UBQ). Binding domains (BD) for ubiquitin (UBQ-BD), PI(3)P (PI(3)P-BD and GLUE-D) and PI (3,5)P2 (PI(3,5)P2-BD) are depicted as domains belonging to the respective proteins. The red arrow shows cargo deubiquitination by USP8 (taken from [17]). Recruitment of ESCRT-III and Vps4 subunits corresponds approximately to the sequence shown from left to right. ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; ILV, intraluminal vesicle.

Close modal
Table 1
Overview of the ESCRT components in Caenorhabditis elegans, Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
C. elegansH. sapiensS. cerevisiae
ESCRTSequenceGeneAlternative namesUniprotKBGeneAlternative namesSystematic nameGeneAlternative names
0 C07G1.5 hgrs-1 CELE_C07G1.5, pqn9, vps-27 O14964 HGS HRS YNR006W VPS27 GRD1, SSV17, VPL23, VPT27, DID7 
 C34G6.7 stam-1 CELE_C34G6.7, pqn-19 Q92783; O75886 STAM; STAM2 STAM1; HBP YHL002W HSE1 - 
I C09G12.9 tsg-101 CELE_C09G12.9 Q99816 TSG101 - YCL008C STP22 AGS1, VPL15, VPS23 
 CD4.4 vps-37 CELE_CD4.4 Q8NEZ2; Q9H9H4; A5D8V6; Q86XT2 VPS37A; B; C; D HCRP1;-;PML39; WBSCR24 YLR119W SRN2 VPL16, VPS37, SRN10 
 C06A6.3 mvb-12 CELE_C06A6.3 Q96EY5; Q9H7P6 MVB12A, MVB12B CFBP, FAM125A; C9orf28, FAM125B YGR206W MVB12 - 
 Y87G2A.10 vps-28 CELE_Y87G2A.10 Q9UK41 VPS28 - YPL065W VPS28 VPL13, VPT28 
II F17C11.8 vps-36 CELE_F17C11.8, tag-318 Q86VN1 VPS36 C13orf9, EAP45 YLR417W VPS36 GRD12, VAC3, VPL11 
 C27F2.5 vps-22 CELE_C27F2.5 Q96H20 SNF8 EAP30 YPL002C SNF8 VPS22, VPL14 
 W02A11.2 vps-25 CELE_W02A11.2 Q9BRG1 VPS25 DERP9, EAP20 YJR102C VPS25 VPL12, VPT25 
III Y65B4A.3 vps-20 CELE_ Y65B4A.3,Y65B4A.d, Y65B4A.h Q96FZ7 CHMP6 VPS20 YMR077C VPS20 VPT20, VPL10, CHM6 
 C56C10.3 vps-32.1 CELE_C56C10.3, phi-27, tag-309 Q9BY43; Q9H444; Q96CF2 CHMP4A;B;C C14orf123, SHAX2; C20orf178, SHAX1; SHAX3 YLR025W SNF7 RNS4, VPL5, DID1, VPS32 
 T27F7.1 vps-24 CELE_T27F7.1 Q9Y3E7 CHMP3 CGI149, NEDF, VPS24 YKL041W VPS24 VPL26, DID3 
 Y46G5A.12 vps-2 CELE_Y46G5A.12 O43633; Q9UQN3 CHMP2A; CHMP2B BC2, CHMP2; - YKL002W DID4 VPS14, GRD7, REN1, VPL2, VPT14, CHM2, VPS2 
III
add. 
F23C8.6 did-2 CELE_F23C8.6, phi-24 Q9HD42; Q7LBR1 CHMP1A; CHMP1B CHMP1, KIAA0047, PCOLN3, PRSM1; C18orf2 YKR035W-A DID2 VPL30, FTI1, CHM1, VPS46 
 F41E6.9 vps-60 CELE_F41E6.9 Q9NZZ3 CHMP5 C9orf83, SNF7DC2 YDR486C VPS60 CHM5, MOS10 
 K10C8.3 istr-1 CELE_K10C8.3 P53990 IST1 KIAA0174 YNL265C IST1 - 
 T24B8.2 chmp-7 CELE_T24B8.2 Q8WUX9 CHMP7 - YJL049W CHM7 - 
 Y74C10AL.2 Y74C10AL.2 CELE_Y74C10AL.2, Y74C10AL.a O95807;P56557 TMEM50A; TMEM50B SMP1;C21orf4 YOL129W VPS68 - 
Vps4 Y34D9A.10 vps-4 CELE_Y34D9A.10, CELE_Y34D9A.b, phi-25 Q9UN37; O75351 VPS4A; VPS4B VPS4; SKD1, VPS42 YPR173C VPS4 VPL4, VPT10, DID6, CSC1, END13, GRD13 
 T23G11.7 T23G11.7 CELE_T23G11.7, vta-1 Q9NP79 VTA1 C60orf55 YLR181C VTA1 - 
DUB E01B7.1 usp-50 CELE_E01B7.1, Y59A8B.b, Y59A8B.a, phi-33 P40818 USP8 KIAA0055, UBPY YDR069C or YER144C DOA4 or UBP5 DOS1, MUT4, NPI2, SSV7, UBP4 or - 
Assoc. R10E12.1 alx-1 CELE_R10E12.1, YNK1, pqn-58 Q8WUM4 PDCD6IP AIP1, ALIX, KIAA1375 YOR275C RIM20 - 
 Y53H1C.2 ego-2 CELE_Y53H1C.2 Q9H3S7 PTPN23 KIAA1471,HD-PTP YPL084W BRO1 VPS31, LPF2, ASI6, NPI3 
C. elegansH. sapiensS. cerevisiae
ESCRTSequenceGeneAlternative namesUniprotKBGeneAlternative namesSystematic nameGeneAlternative names
0 C07G1.5 hgrs-1 CELE_C07G1.5, pqn9, vps-27 O14964 HGS HRS YNR006W VPS27 GRD1, SSV17, VPL23, VPT27, DID7 
 C34G6.7 stam-1 CELE_C34G6.7, pqn-19 Q92783; O75886 STAM; STAM2 STAM1; HBP YHL002W HSE1 - 
I C09G12.9 tsg-101 CELE_C09G12.9 Q99816 TSG101 - YCL008C STP22 AGS1, VPL15, VPS23 
 CD4.4 vps-37 CELE_CD4.4 Q8NEZ2; Q9H9H4; A5D8V6; Q86XT2 VPS37A; B; C; D HCRP1;-;PML39; WBSCR24 YLR119W SRN2 VPL16, VPS37, SRN10 
 C06A6.3 mvb-12 CELE_C06A6.3 Q96EY5; Q9H7P6 MVB12A, MVB12B CFBP, FAM125A; C9orf28, FAM125B YGR206W MVB12 - 
 Y87G2A.10 vps-28 CELE_Y87G2A.10 Q9UK41 VPS28 - YPL065W VPS28 VPL13, VPT28 
II F17C11.8 vps-36 CELE_F17C11.8, tag-318 Q86VN1 VPS36 C13orf9, EAP45 YLR417W VPS36 GRD12, VAC3, VPL11 
 C27F2.5 vps-22 CELE_C27F2.5 Q96H20 SNF8 EAP30 YPL002C SNF8 VPS22, VPL14 
 W02A11.2 vps-25 CELE_W02A11.2 Q9BRG1 VPS25 DERP9, EAP20 YJR102C VPS25 VPL12, VPT25 
III Y65B4A.3 vps-20 CELE_ Y65B4A.3,Y65B4A.d, Y65B4A.h Q96FZ7 CHMP6 VPS20 YMR077C VPS20 VPT20, VPL10, CHM6 
 C56C10.3 vps-32.1 CELE_C56C10.3, phi-27, tag-309 Q9BY43; Q9H444; Q96CF2 CHMP4A;B;C C14orf123, SHAX2; C20orf178, SHAX1; SHAX3 YLR025W SNF7 RNS4, VPL5, DID1, VPS32 
 T27F7.1 vps-24 CELE_T27F7.1 Q9Y3E7 CHMP3 CGI149, NEDF, VPS24 YKL041W VPS24 VPL26, DID3 
 Y46G5A.12 vps-2 CELE_Y46G5A.12 O43633; Q9UQN3 CHMP2A; CHMP2B BC2, CHMP2; - YKL002W DID4 VPS14, GRD7, REN1, VPL2, VPT14, CHM2, VPS2 
III
add. 
F23C8.6 did-2 CELE_F23C8.6, phi-24 Q9HD42; Q7LBR1 CHMP1A; CHMP1B CHMP1, KIAA0047, PCOLN3, PRSM1; C18orf2 YKR035W-A DID2 VPL30, FTI1, CHM1, VPS46 
 F41E6.9 vps-60 CELE_F41E6.9 Q9NZZ3 CHMP5 C9orf83, SNF7DC2 YDR486C VPS60 CHM5, MOS10 
 K10C8.3 istr-1 CELE_K10C8.3 P53990 IST1 KIAA0174 YNL265C IST1 - 
 T24B8.2 chmp-7 CELE_T24B8.2 Q8WUX9 CHMP7 - YJL049W CHM7 - 
 Y74C10AL.2 Y74C10AL.2 CELE_Y74C10AL.2, Y74C10AL.a O95807;P56557 TMEM50A; TMEM50B SMP1;C21orf4 YOL129W VPS68 - 
Vps4 Y34D9A.10 vps-4 CELE_Y34D9A.10, CELE_Y34D9A.b, phi-25 Q9UN37; O75351 VPS4A; VPS4B VPS4; SKD1, VPS42 YPR173C VPS4 VPL4, VPT10, DID6, CSC1, END13, GRD13 
 T23G11.7 T23G11.7 CELE_T23G11.7, vta-1 Q9NP79 VTA1 C60orf55 YLR181C VTA1 - 
DUB E01B7.1 usp-50 CELE_E01B7.1, Y59A8B.b, Y59A8B.a, phi-33 P40818 USP8 KIAA0055, UBPY YDR069C or YER144C DOA4 or UBP5 DOS1, MUT4, NPI2, SSV7, UBP4 or - 
Assoc. R10E12.1 alx-1 CELE_R10E12.1, YNK1, pqn-58 Q8WUM4 PDCD6IP AIP1, ALIX, KIAA1375 YOR275C RIM20 - 
 Y53H1C.2 ego-2 CELE_Y53H1C.2 Q9H3S7 PTPN23 KIAA1471,HD-PTP YPL084W BRO1 VPS31, LPF2, ASI6, NPI3 

All common components between the three model systems are shown. Color coding for ESCRT complexes is the same as in Figures 1–3. Main gene names are given in black (according to the respective databases: wormbase.org, uniprot.org, yeastgenome.org). Sequence or gene numberings of the databases are given in blue. Alternative names are indicated in green. For human genes, different isoforms are given and separated by semicolons (;). The ESCRT complexes are given on the left (colors refer to the same ESCRT complexes throughout all figures). Additional factors of ESCRT-III (III add.) and associated factors (Assoc.) are also listed (taken from (17)).

ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport.

In this review, we will first summarize the current knowledge on ESCRT and the factors involved in Rab conversion. Then, we will discuss the role of ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and the MON1/CCZ1-driven Rab conversion during endosome maturation. Finally, we will propose a unified endosome maturation model, incorporating current mechanistic findings of the regulatory role of ESCRTs during the Rab5-to-Rab7 switch, and highlight remaining open questions in the field.

Formation of ILVs, it’s easy as 0, I, II, III

The ESCRT machinery consists of factors belonging to five distinct complexes (ESCRT-0 to ESCRT-III and Vps4) and several additional and associated factors (Figure 3) [27,28]. In Caenorhabditis elegans and H. sapiens over 20 and 30, respectively, different ESCRT factors are encoded in the genome (see Table 1). The five complexes can be functionally divided, in relation to their role during ILV formation on the endosome, into early-acting ESCRTs (0 and I) and late-acting ESCRTs (III and Vps4) (see Figure 3). In general, early ESCRTs are mainly involved in recognizing and corralling of the ubiquitin marked cargo, whereas late ESCRTs are mainly responsible for shaping the ILV through membrane bending and scission.

ESCRT-II is also often simply referred to as early-acting ESCRT because, like ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I, it is a stable complex, has ubiquitin-binding capabilities and is recruited upstream of ESCRT-III [11,29,30].

ESCRT-mediated ILV formation starts at the early endosome, which receives endocytic cargo from the plasma membrane and where cargo is recognized by early ESCRTs (Figure 3) [10]. This recognition requires that the cargo is ubiquitinated and is mainly performed by ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I, which have the most ubiquitin-binding sites. Both HRS and STAM (in ESCRT-0) can bind ubiquitin, while TSG101, MVB12 and UBAP1 (in ESCRT-I) also have ubiquitin-binding domains (Figure 3). Both complexes are also believed to associate into larger degradative domains with corralled cargo bound to them [31-38]. Cargoes that are not ubiquitinated avoid the degradative fate and will be recycled back to the plasma membrane or transported to other cellular compartments (see Figure 1) [11,13].

ESCRT-0 consists of HRS and STAM/STAM2 [39], and it recognizes ubiquitinated degradation cargo through its multiple binding domains and the concomitant detection of PI(3)P by the FYVE domain of HRS [33,40-42]. Interestingly, HRS is ubiquitinated itself by E3 ligases such as NEDD4 [43]. Once recruited, ESCRT-0 starts to concentrate the cargo in degradative subdomains and recruits further ESCRT factors [10] (Figures 2 and 3). One factor recruited to the early endosome at this point is the deubiquitinase USP8 [44]. The early role of USP8 is to deubiquitinate HRS to protect the whole ESCRT-0 from degradation [43,45]. This mechanism is an important regulator of the ESCRT-0 stability [17,24,44,46,47]. Interestingly, HRS does not seem to be the only ubiquitinated early ESCRT factor, as the ubiquitination of STAM, TSG101, and MVB12 has also been demonstrated [37,43,48] (reviewed in [49]).

TSG101 is recruited through ESCRT-0 and is a part of the heterotetrameric ESCRT-I, which consists of TSG101, VPS37, VPS28, and MVB12 or UBAP1 [35,50,51]. ESCRT-I, in general, is able to bind ubiquitin and support the cargo corralling initiated by ESCRT-0, but its specific properties are dependent on the combination of ESCRT-I isoforms incorporated [31,37,52-54]. For example, the use of an MVB12 isoform for the complex assembly adds the potential to bind to PIPs, whereas the incorporation of UBAP1 adds more potential ubiquitin-binding sites to the complex [35,37,55].

In addition to its function in cargo binding, ESCRT-I is involved in the recruitment of the heterotetrameric ESCRT-II [56,57]. This complex consists of EAP30, EAP20, and EAP45 and exhibits a conserved ‘Y’-shaped conformation [57-59]. The GLUE domain of EAP45 interacts with ubiquitin and a variety of PIPs, and the N-terminal basic helix domain of EAP30 has also an affinity to several different PIPs [57,60] (as shown in Figure 3). Moreover, this complex can interact with the ESCRT-III factor CHMP6 through EAP20. This in turn initiates the ESCRT-III filament assembly cascade required for the membrane bending during ILV formation [56,61,62].

The ESCRT-III filament assembly cascade consists of a series of orchestrated filament assemblies, disassemblies, and filament remodeling events facilitated by Vps4 activity [11]. Moreover, studies in yeast showed that USP8 interferes with the assembly/disassembly of ESCRT-III filaments to increase the potential time for cargo deubiquitination and is regulated by ESCRT-III [63-65]. Additionally, the USP8 deubiquitinase seems to be directly involved in filament formation because it actively deubiquitinates ESCRT-III factors to regulate their activities [66,67]. Studies published in recent years defined the dynamics of ESCRT-III filaments [68,69]. In studies performed with purified yeast proteins, it was shown that the formation of vesicles through pinch-off events mediated by ESCRTs requires a stepwise assembly and disassembly of ESCRT-III filaments, which is moderated by Vps4 using ATP [69, 70]. During this cascade of events, conformational changes will cause a reduction in autoinhibition, allowing interactions with the following ESCRT-III subunits [71,72]. The process is probably directional, and biochemical studies in yeast revealed the highly co-ordinated manner in which the core complex of CHMP6, CHMP4, CHMP3, and CHMP2 is assembled [72-74]. These processes support the disconnection of the formed vesicle from the surrounding membrane and recycle the involved ESCRT-III components [75]. It was revealed that the recruitment of ESCRT-III is also dependent on the curvature and tension of the target membrane [76-78] and the functions of ALIX [79-82] and HD-PTP [83,84].

Recently, several studies addressed the regulatory role of ESCRT-mediated ILV formation during endosomal maturation [17,23,24,85,86]. These insights will be discussed in more detail in a later section. For authoritative reviews about this topic, please read [29,72,87].

Multiple ways of RABEX5 recruitment

One of the first [88,89] and best-characterized [90] guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) is RABEX5 [91]. It belongs to the GEF family of Vps9-domain-containing proteins [92] and is recruited to the early endosome through an interplay of mechanisms where it promotes the recruitment of Rab5A [93]. To enable its own recruitment, RABEX5 contains different domains: zinc finger motif, ubiquitin interacting motif, membrane binding domain, helical bundle domain, Vps9 domain, coiled-coil domain, and proline-rich domain [24,94] (Figure 2A). One of the major recruitment mechanisms for RABEX5 is ubiquitin-dependent and mediated by the zinc finger and ubiquitin-interacting motif (see Figure 2B part I) [95-97]. The ubiquitin interaction is important for the recruitment of the GEF to endosomal compartments [17,26,93,98,99]. The early endosomal targeting domain, consisting of membrane binding and helical bundle domain, is also involved in the recruitment of RABEX5 (Figure 2A and B part I) [100,101]. Moreover, RABEX5 can also be recruited to the early endosome through an indirect mechanism mediated by RABAPTIN5 (also known as RABEP1) [100,102-105]. However, this mechanism is being called into question by recent findings [106] (reviewed in [107]). How all of these recruitment mechanisms interact with each other during RABEX5 recruitment is currently not really understood.

The RABEX5-Rab5-positive feedback loop

Once recruited onto the early endosome, RABEX5 in turn recruits Rab5 and activates it through its Vps9-like GEF domain [93,100,105,108,109] (Figure 2A). The activity of the Vps9 domain is regulated through inhibitory intramolecular interactions involving the ubiquitin-binding domains and the coiled-coil domain [100,105,109]. It has been shown that the inhibitory influence of the coiled-coil domain of RABEX5 can be reduced by interactions with RABAPTIN5 and that the binding of ubiquitin by the two ubiquitin-binding domains increases the GEF activity of RABEX5 [94,100,105,109]. Both mechanisms most probably contribute in vivo to keep the GEF activity of RABEX5 high at the early endosome and to recruit more Rab5 [18,93,106,109]. This leads to the formation of Rab5 nanodomains [110] and the recruitment of numerous effectors, such as the PI(3)P kinase VPS34 [111,112]. It was demonstrated that PI(3)P has a positive effect on the recruitment of Rab5A [113]. This observation fits very well with two other studies, showing that Rab5A GTP actively stimulates PI(3)P production by interacting with the PI (3)P kinase VPS34 complex II [114,115]. The positive feedback loop of Rab5 recruitment and activation, established in this way, must be interrupted in order to successfully switch an endosome from Rab5 to Rab7. Rab conversion mediated by MON1/CCZ1 serves this purpose [5,7].

Rab conversion mediated by MON1/CCZ1

This central step during endosomal maturation starts with the recruitment of the MON1/CCZ1 complex to the early endosome. It consists of MON1A or B and CCZ1 (short MON1/CCZ1) [25,116,117]. The complex binds to RABEX5 and PI(3)P by coincidence detection for its recruitment [25]. It was shown that the interaction of MON1 with Rab5 is also important for the recruitment of the complex and that the interaction with PIPs is mediated by a basic patch in MON1 that binds to negatively charged PIPs through electrostatic interactions [118-121] (Figure 2B part IV, Figure 1). Moreover, it has been shown that the complex has a third subunit in metazoans, called RMC1. The third subunit is possibly involved in the recruitment of the complex to endosomes [117,122-124]. This idea is further supported by the recently published cryo-electron microscopy structure of MON1-CCZ1-RMC1, which shows that RMC1 has a conserved basic patch which aligns with the lipid-binding site of MON1 and could, thus, potentially support the membrane binding of the trimeric complex [123-125].

After its recruitment and stabilization on the endosomal membrane, the MON1/CCZ1 complex interacts with RABEX5 to displace it from the membrane and interrupt the positive feedback loop that keeps Rab5 activated [25]. Simultaneously, the complex also acts as a GEF for Rab7 and activates Rab7 on the maturing endosome [25,126,127] (Figure 2B part IV, Figure 1).

This GEF function is highly conserved from yeast to man [128-131]. Moreover, the exact mode of action of the GEF was uncovered in the last years through studies with yeast proteins and is based on two effects of MON1/CCZ1 binding to Rab7, which modulate the nucleotide-binding pocket [7,118,129,132,133]. Surprisingly, the third subunit in metazoans seems to have no big influence on the GEF activity of the complex in vitro [118,122]. Thus, the third subunit might serve to stabilized MON1/CCZ1 on endosomal membranes.

An important mechanism for Rab5 to Rab7 conversion is also GTP hydrolysis by Rab5 promoted by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that will lead to Rab5 on membranes to be extracted by the GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) [92,134,135]. In a recently published study, it could be shown that MON1/CCZ1 indirectly recruits the novel Rab5 GAP, TBC1D18 (also called RABGAP1L), to endosomes during Rab conversion. Hereby, it supports the dissociation of Rab5 and promotes the Rab switch [1]. In addition, Rab5 is regulated by RabGAP-5, which limits the amount of activated Rab5 and thereby regulates the homotypic fusion and endosomal traffic. This suggests that this GAP is crucial for the function of Rab5 and the subsequent Rab5 to Rab7 conversion [136].

Cargo abundance regulates the localization of RABEX5

ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion during endosome maturation have to be performed in a way that ensures that the degradation cargo is removed from the limiting membrane and deposited in ILVs before the late endosome finally fuses with a lysosome to degrade the cargo [5]. This basic requirement implies that both processes should be co-ordinated for a successful endosome maturation.

The early endosome receives ubiquitinated cargo from the plasma membrane, which accumulates over time and is bound by ESCRT-0 and additional factors. One of these factors is the Rab5GEF RABEX5, which in turn recruits Rab5 and further factors that cause an increase in the PI(3)P concentration in the endosomal membrane. This, together with the high amount of ubiquitinated cargo, enhances the recruitment of ESCRT-0 factors to early endosomes [17,20,137-140].

Once recruited, ESCRT-0 starts to concentrate the cargo on the endosome in specific degradative subdomains [17,32,141-143]. As a consequence of cargo corralling and the recruitment of ESCRT-I to these domains [32,143], the amount of unbound cargo on endosomes is diminished [17] (Figure 2B). This effect is reinforced by the fact that the early endosome stops accepting new cargo from the plasma membrane at a certain point [2,144] and that non-ubiquitinated cargo is recycled either to the plasma membrane or to the trans-Golgi network [10] . Colocalization studies with Rab5 and Rab7 suggest that early ESCRT-mediated cargo corralling is mainly upstream of Rab conversion [17]. Indeed, ESCRT-0 factor HRS preferentially colocalizes with Rab5, and not with Rab7 [17,137,145], and acts mechanistically upstream of MON1/CCZ1 [17]. RABEX5 is dependent on the abundance of ubiquitinated cargo in order to be localized effectively to endosomes [26]. Therefore, cargo corralling by early ESCRTs destabilizes the endosome binding of RABEX5, which in turn supports its displacement by MON1/CCZ1. The presence of RABEX5 and high amounts of PI(3)P on the endosome facilitate MON1/CCZ1 binding, thereby causing Rab7 activation and initiating Rab conversion. Conversely, early ESCRT knockdowns cause the formation of enlarged Rab5-, RABEX5-, ubiquitin- and HRS-positive structures, suggesting that under these conditions, cargo corralling is impaired and RABEX5 remains fairly stably bound to the endosome and cannot be displaced by MON1/CCZ1. In later ESCRT knockdowns, a high colocalization of Rab5 with Rab7 on enlarged ubiquitin-positive structures indicates that the Rab switch could be initiated but not completed because cargo corralling is less efficient and RABEX5 could not be fully displaced [17]. In fact, several publications have already shown that ESCRT deficiencies lead to the formation of enlarged early endosomal structures and hinder endocytic flow [24,146-150]. These structures cannot successfully undergo Rab conversion and, therefore, cannot mature. These conclusions are further supported by the observation of synthetic lethality between mon1(KO) and several ESCRT knockdowns in C. elegans, indicating a connection between ILV formation and Rab conversion [17]. A reduction in the amount of ubiquitin in a mon1(KO) strain reduces the size of early endosomes and causes a partial recruitment of Rab7 to endosomes, even in the absence of its canonical GEF. Together, these data indicate that RABEX5 binding to the endosome is largely driven by its capacity to bind ubiquitin. Consistently, a rabex5 knockdown has a similar effect as the ubiquitin reduction in this strain, and Rab7 is recruited to endosomes [17]. Thus, the amount of ubiquitinated cargo and the function of early ESCRT regulate the timing of Rab conversion. This co-ordination mechanism may explain why EGF treatment, which increases the concentration of EGFR on endosomes, delays Rab conversion in tissue culture cells [151].

The role of deubiquitination during endosome maturation

USP8 is a deubiquitinase that functions at many stages during endosome maturation. An early role of USP8 is to deubiquitinate HRS, which was previously ubiquitinated by E3 ligases [43,45]. Therefore, without USP8 to protect ESCRT-0 from degradation, early cargo corralling and the very start of endosome maturation would become impossible [17,24,44,46,47]. The localization of USP8 to activated receptors on endosomes is dependent on the large HD-PTP protein [23,84,152]. On the other hand, USP8 also interacts with several late ESCRTs to regulate the assembly/disassembly of ESCRT-III filaments to increase the potential time for cargo deubiquitination [63-65]. USP8 is also directly involved in filament formation by actively deubiquitinating ESCRT-III factors to regulate their activities [66,67]. In addition, USP8 binds directly to and drives the deubiquitination of cargo [84, 153] (Figure 2 and 3).

Intriguingly, USP8 is also involved in other aspects of endosome maturation, namely Rab conversion. It was found to be recruited to Rab5-positive endosomes and USP8 mutants accumulated enlarged early endosomes [24]. Additionally, USP8 binds to the N-terminal Zink Finger-ubiquitin binding motives and the C-terminal coiled-coil of RABEX5 (Figure 2B part III), and this recruitment to early endosomes causes the dissociation of RABEX5. Specifically, the deubiquitination of position K323 on C. elegans RABEX5 leads to its disconnection from endosomes. Last but not the least, MON1/CCZ1 recruitment to endosomes is dependent on USP8 [24]. Taken together, these observations suggest a role of USP8 in the spatiotemporal regulation and co-ordination of ESCRT-driven ILV formation and Rab conversion, even while opening many new questions about the exact mechanisms underlying the different functions of deubiquitination in these processes.

HD-PTP, a direct connection between ESCRT and RABAPTIN5/RABEX5

RABAPTIN5 plays a crucial role in keeping RABEX5 active on endosomal membranes. It has been shown to bind to the inhibitory coiled-coil domain of RABEX5, thereby keeping its GEF domain active [105]. Therefore, RABAPTIN5 is an ideal target for RABEX5 regulation. In a separate role from binding USP8, HD-PTP also connects RABAPTIN5 directly to the ESCRT machinery [23]. This connection opens up new avenues to regulate and co-ordinate the two branches of endosome maturation. HD-PTP seems to play an inhibitory role in Rab5 activation, since its depletion enhances Rab5 activity on endosomes. HD-PTP binds initially to the ESCRT-0 subunit STAM2 [84] (Figure 2B part II). Subsequently, HD-PTP interacts with ESCRT-I [83], and in a third step, the Bro1 domain switches from binding ESCRT-0 to binding CHMP4, the first filament forming subunit of ESCRT-III [83]. Finally, direct binding of the Bro1 domain of HD-PTP to RABAPTIN5 was found to be responsible for the down-regulation of RABEX5 activity [23] (Figure 2B part III and IV). This mechanism offers the opportunity for co-ordination inside the ILV formation pathway and regulation of Rab conversion.

Co-ordination of ESCRT functions and Rab conversion: several answers and new questions

The ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion are two important processes during endosome maturation whose co-ordination is based on three different mechanisms. One mechanism is founded on the amount of ubiquitinated degradation cargo on the endosomal surface. This cargo stabilizes RABEX5 on the endosomal membrane and prevents Rab conversion. The ESCRT machinery reduces the amount of cargo during endosome maturation through cargo corralling and ILV generation. This action destabilizes RABEX5 endosome association and allows the displacement by MON1/CCZ1 [17].

Another mechanism is based on the deubiquitinase USP8. This ESCRT factor is recruited to the early endosome through RABEX5 and deubiquitinates the Rab5GEF. This deubiquitination together with the supported recruitment of MON1/CCZ1 causes the dissociation of RABEX5 and allows Rab conversion [24].

In the third mechanism, HD-PTP and RABAPTIN5 are the key players, which influence the association of RABEX5 to the endosome. On the early endosome, HD-PTP binds to ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I factors and is not available for interactions with RABAPTIN5. During maturation, ESCRT-0 leaves the endosome and ESCRT-III factors get recruited. This causes a binding switch for HD-PTP from ESCRT-0 to ESCRT-III. When early ESCRT-III factors leave the endosome and later factors are recruited, HD-PTP is released and can interact with RABAPTIN5. This interaction interferes most likely with the interaction of RABAPTIN5 and RABEX5 and indirectly promotes Rab conversion [23].

Therefore, it appears that cells have found several ways to co-ordinate ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion. We propose a model taking all three processes into account (Figures 1 and 2). The idea behind this unification was to create an overview of the co-ordination of ESCRT-mediated ILV formation and Rab conversion. The model is also intended as a starting point for further investigations. Given the multiple roles of USP8 and HD-PTP on endosomes, the question arises about how they are regulated. In addition, we do not know whether all these mechanisms have the same relevance in all cell types and organisms.

  • Intraluminal vesicle (ILV) formation by endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) and Rab conversion are intricately connected through factors that converge on the regulation of RABEX5 and the maintenance of Rab5 on early endosomes.

  • Four main processes are at play in co-ordinating these activities:

 1. Depletion of ubiquitinated cargo destined for degradation by corralling through ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I.

 2. Deubiquitination of RABEX5 by USP8, which is also involved in the maturation of late ESCRT filaments and cargo deubiquitination.

 3. Direct binding of His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase (HD-PTP) to ESCRT factors and the RABAPTIN5/RABEX5 complex, thereby potentially regulating and co-ordinating both pathways.

 4. MON1/CCZ1 binding and displacement of RABEX5 coupled to recruitment of Rab7 to drive Rab conversion.

  • Exploring the connections between the four discovered mechanisms will enable a deeper understanding of the progression from early to late endosomes and promote the investigation of further possible co-ordination during endosome maturation.

The authors declare no competing interests.

The work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_197779, 320030_231859 to A.S.] and the University of Basel.

Conceptualization: JAS,DPO, AS; Supervision: AS; Funding aquisition: AS; Visualization: DPO, JAS; Writing-originaldraft: JAS, DPO, AS;

Writing-review & editing: JAS, DPO, AS

We acknowledge the financial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation. We sincerely apologize to all whose valuable work we could not include due to space limitations.

ELR

endocytic lysosome reformation

ESCRT

endosomal sorting complex required for transport

FERARI

factors for endosome recycling and Rab interactions

GAP

GTPase-activating protein

GEF

guanine nucleotide exchange factor

HD-PTP

His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase

HOPS

homotypic fusion and protein sorting

ILV

intraluminal vesicle

MVB

multivesicular body

PIP

phosphosinositide phosphate

1.
Hiragi
,
S.
,
Matsui
,
T.
,
Sakamaki
,
Y.
and
Fukuda
,
M
. (
2022
)
TBC1D18 is a Rab5-GAP that coordinates endosome maturation together with Mon1
.
J. Cell Biol.
221
, e202201114 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202201114
2.
Huotari
,
J.
and
Helenius
,
A
. (
2011
)
Endosome maturation
.
EMBO J.
30
,
3481
3500
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.286
3.
Scott
,
C.C.
,
Vacca
,
F.
and
Gruenberg
,
J
. (
2014
)
Endosome maturation, transport and functions
.
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
31
,
2
10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.034
4.
McDermott
,
H.
and
Kim
,
K
. (
2015
)
Molecular dynamics at the endocytic portal and regulations of endocytic and recycling traffics
.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
94
,
235
248
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.04.003
5.
Podinovskaia
,
M.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2018
)
The endosomal network: mediators and regulators of endosome maturation
.
Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol.
57
,
1
38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96704-2_1
6.
Klumperman
,
J.
and
Raposo
,
G
. (
2014
)
The complex ultrastructure of the endolysosomal system
.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.
6
, a016857 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016857
7.
Borchers
,
A.C.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
and
Ungermann
,
C
. (
2021
)
Who’s in control? Principles of Rab GTPase activation in endolysosomal membrane trafficking and beyond
.
J. Cell Biol.
220
, e202105120 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105120
8.
Hu
,
Y.B.
,
Dammer
,
E.B.
,
Ren
,
R.J.
and
Wang
,
G
. (
2015
)
The endosomal-lysosomal system: from acidification and cargo sorting to neurodegeneration
.
Transl. Neurodegener.
4
,
18
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-015-0041-1
9.
Solinger
,
J.A.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2022
)
Sorting of cargo in the tubular endosomal network
.
Bioessays
44
, e2200158 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202200158
10.
Cullen
,
P.J.
and
Steinberg
,
F
. (
2018
)
To degrade or not to degrade: mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling
.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
19
,
679
696
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7
11.
Schuh
,
A.L.
and
Audhya
,
A
. (
2014
)
The ESCRT machinery: from the plasma membrane to endosomes and back again
.
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
49
,
242
261
https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2014.881777
12.
O’Sullivan
,
M.J.
and
Lindsay
,
A.J
. (
2020
)
The endosomal recycling pathway-at the crossroads of the cell
.
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
21
, 6074 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176074
13.
MacDonald
,
E.
,
Savage
,
B.
and
Zech
,
T
. (
2020
)
Connecting the dots: combined control of endocytic recycling and degradation
.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
48
,
2377
2386
https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20180255
14.
Posor
,
Y.
,
Jang
,
W.
and
Haucke
,
V
. (
2022
)
Phosphoinositides as membrane organizers
.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
23
,
797
816
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00490-x
15.
Van der Beek
,
J.
,
Jonker
,
C.
,
Van der Welle
,
R.
,
Liv
,
N.
and
Klumperman
,
J
. (
2019
)
CORVET, CHEVI and HOPS - multisubunit tethers of the endo-lysosomal system in health and disease
.
J. Cell. Sci.
132
, jcs189134 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.189134
16.
Bonifacino
,
J.S.
and
Neefjes
,
J
. (
2017
)
Moving and positioning the endolysosomal system
.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
47
,
1
8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2017.01.008
17.
Ott
,
D.P.
,
Desai
,
S.
,
Solinger
,
J.A.
,
Kaech
,
A.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2025
)
Coordination between ESCRT function and Rab conversion during endosome maturation
.
EMBO J.
44
,
1574
1607
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44318-025-00367-7
18.
Podinovskaia
,
M.
,
Prescianotto-Baschong
,
C.
,
Buser
,
D.P.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2021
)
A novel live-cell imaging assay reveals regulation of endosome maturation
.
Elife
10
, e70982 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70982
19.
Solinger
,
J.A.
,
Rashid
,
H.O.
,
Prescianotto-Baschong
,
C.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2020
)
FERARI is required for Rab11-dependent endocytic recycling
.
Nat. Cell Biol.
22
,
213
224
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0456-5
20.
Solinger
,
J.A.
,
Rashid
,
H.O.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2022
)
FERARI and cargo adaptors coordinate cargo flow through sorting endosomes
.
Nat. Commun.
13
, 4620 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32377-y
21.
Solinger
,
J.A.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2014
)
Loss of the Sec1/Munc18-family proteins VPS-33.2 and VPS-33.1 bypasses a block in endosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
25
,
3909
3925
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-12-0710
22.
Schneider
,
K.
,
Farr
,
T.
,
Pinter
,
N.
,
Schmitt
,
K.
,
Valerius
,
O.
,
Braus
,
G.H.
et al.
(
2022
)
The Nma1 protein promotes long distance transport mediated by early endosomes in Ustilago maydis
.
Mol. Microbiol.
117
,
334
352
https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14851
23.
Parkinson
,
G.
,
Roboti
,
P.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Taylor
,
S.
and
Woodman
,
P
. (
2021
)
His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase and Rabaptin-5 couple endo-lysosomal sorting of EGFR with endosomal maturation
.
J. Cell. Sci.
134
, jcs259192 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.259192
24.
Miao
,
Y.
,
Du
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
B.
,
Liang
,
J.
,
Liang
,
Y.
,
Dang
,
S.
et al.
(
2024
)
Spatiotemporal recruitment of the ubiquitin-specific protease USP8 directs endosome maturation
.
Cell Biol
13
, RP96353 https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.10.575034
25.
Poteryaev
,
D.
,
Datta
,
S.
,
Ackema
,
K.
,
Zerial
,
M.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2010
)
Identification of the switch in early-to-late endosome transition
.
Cell
141
,
497
508
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.011
26.
Mattera
,
R.
and
Bonifacino
,
J.S
. (
2008
)
Ubiquitin binding and conjugation regulate the recruitment of Rabex-5 to early endosomes
.
EMBO J.
27
,
2484
2494
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.177
27.
Leung
,
K.F.
,
Dacks
,
J.B.
and
Field
,
M.C
. (
2008
)
Evolution of the multivesicular body ESCRT machinery; retention across the eukaryotic lineage
.
Traffic
9
,
1698
1716
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00797.x
28.
Wideman
,
J.G.
,
Leung
,
K.F.
,
Field
,
M.C.
and
Dacks
,
J.B
. (
2014
)
The cell biology of the endocytic system from an evolutionary perspective
.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.
6
, a016998 https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016998
29.
Frankel
,
E.B.
and
Audhya
,
A
. (
2018
)
ESCRT-dependent cargo sorting at multivesicular endosomes
.
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
74
,
4
10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.020
30.
Schmidt
,
O.
and
Teis
,
D
. (
2012
)
The ESCRT machinery
.
Curr. Biol.
22
,
R116
R120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.028
31.
Lu
,
Q.
,
Hope
,
L.W.
,
Brasch
,
M.
,
Reinhard
,
C.
and
Cohen
,
S.N
. (
2003
)
TSG101 interaction with HRS mediates endosomal trafficking and receptor down-regulation
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
100
,
7626
7631
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0932599100
32.
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Wesche
,
J.
,
Malerød
,
L.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2006
)
Flat clathrin coats on endosomes mediate degradative protein sorting by scaffolding HRS in dynamic microdomains
.
J. Cell. Sci.
119
,
2414
2424
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02978
33.
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Bache
,
K.G.
,
Gillooly
,
D.J.
,
Madshus
,
I.H.
,
Stang
,
E.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2002
)
HRS sorts ubiquitinated proteins into clathrin-coated microdomains of early endosomes
.
Nat. Cell Biol.
4
,
394
398
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb791
34.
Bache
,
K.G.
,
Brech
,
A.
,
Mehlum
,
A.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2003
)
Hrs regulates multivesicular body formation via ESCRT recruitment to endosomes
.
J. Cell Biol.
162
,
435
442
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302131
35.
Agromayor
,
M.
,
Soler
,
N.
,
Caballe
,
A.
,
Kueck
,
T.
,
Freund
,
S.M.
,
Allen
,
M.D.
et al.
(
2012
)
The UBAP1 subunit of ESCRT-I interacts with ubiquitin via a SOUBA domain
.
Structure
20
,
414
428
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.12.013
36.
Bache
,
K.G.
,
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Mehlum
,
A.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2003
)
STAM and HRS are subunits of a multivalent ubiquitin-binding complex on early endosomes
.
J. Biol. Chem.
278
,
12513
12521
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210843200
37.
Tsunematsu
,
T.
,
Yamauchi
,
E.
,
Shibata
,
H.
,
Maki
,
M.
,
Ohta
,
T.
and
Konishi
,
H
. (
2010
)
Distinct functions of human MVB12A and MVB12B in the ESCRT-I dependent on their posttranslational modifications
.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
399
,
232
237
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.060
38.
Sundquist
,
W.I.
,
Schubert
,
H.L.
,
Kelly
,
B.N.
,
Hill
,
G.C.
,
Holton
,
J.M.
and
Hill
,
C.P
. (
2004
)
Ubiquitin recognition by the human TSG101 protein
.
Mol. Cell
13
,
783
789
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00129-7
39.
Ren
,
X.
,
Kloer
,
D.P.
,
Kim
,
Y.C.
,
Ghirlando
,
R.
,
Saidi
,
L.F.
,
Hummer
,
G.
et al.
(
2009
)
Hybrid structural model of the complete human ESCRT-0 complex
.
Structure
17
,
406
416
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.01.012
40.
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Bremnes
,
B.
,
Mehlum
,
A.
,
Gillooly
,
D.J.
,
D’Arrigo
,
A.
,
Stang
,
E.
et al.
(
2001
)
FYVE and coiled-coil domains determine the specific localisation of HRS to early endosomes
.
J. Cell. Sci.
114
,
2255
2263
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.114.12.2255
41.
Urbé
,
S.
,
Mills
,
I.G.
,
Stenmark
,
H.
,
Kitamura
,
N.
and
Clague
,
M.J
. (
2000
)
Endosomal localization and receptor dynamics determine tyrosine phosphorylation of hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate
.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20
,
7685
7692
https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.20.7685-7692.2000
42.
Mizuno
,
E.
,
Kawahata
,
K.
,
Okamoto
,
A.
,
Kitamura
,
N.
and
Komada
,
M
. (
2004
)
Association with HRS is required for the early endosomal localization, stability, and function of STAM
.
J. Biochem.
135
,
385
396
https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvh046
43.
Katz
,
M.
,
Shtiegman
,
K.
,
Tal-Or
,
P.
,
Yakir
,
L.
,
Mosesson
,
Y.
,
Harari
,
D.
et al.
(
2002
)
Ligand-independent degradation of epidermal growth factor receptor involves receptor ubiquitylation and Hgs, an adaptor whose ubiquitin-interacting motif targets ubiquitylation by Nedd4
.
Traffic
3
,
740
751
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.31006.x
44.
Row
,
P.E.
,
Prior
,
I.A.
,
McCullough
,
J.
,
Clague
,
M.J.
and
Urbé
,
S
. (
2006
)
The ubiquitin isopeptidase UBPY regulates endosomal ubiquitin dynamics and is essential for receptor down-regulation
.
J. Biol. Chem.
281
,
12618
12624
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M512615200
45.
Alwan
,
H.A.J.
and
Van Leeuwen
,
J.E.M
. (
2007
)
UBPY-mediated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) de-ubiquitination promotes EGFR degradation
.
J. Biol. Chem.
282
,
1658
1669
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604711200
46.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Du
,
J.
,
Lei
,
C.
,
Liu
,
M.
and
Zhu
,
A.J
. (
2014
)
Ubpy controls the stability of the ESCRT-0 subunit Hrs in development
.
Development
141
,
1473
1479
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.099564
47.
Niendorf
,
S.
,
Oksche
,
A.
,
Kisser
,
A.
,
Löhler
,
J.
,
Prinz
,
M.
,
Schorle
,
H.
et al.
(
2007
)
Essential role of ubiquitin-specific protease 8 for receptor tyrosine kinase stability and endocytic trafficking in vivo
.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
27
,
5029
5039
https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01566-06
48.
Amit
,
I.
,
Yakir
,
L.
,
Katz
,
M.
,
Zwang
,
Y.
,
Marmor
,
M.D.
,
Citri
,
A.
et al.
(
2004
)
Tal, a Tsg101-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates receptor endocytosis and retrovirus budding
.
Genes Dev.
18
,
1737
1752
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.294904
49.
Korbei
,
B
. (
2022
)
Ubiquitination of the ubiquitin-binding machinery: how early ESCRT components are controlled
.
Essays Biochem.
66
,
169
177
https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20210042
50.
Stefani
,
F.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Taylor
,
S.
,
Donovan
,
J.
,
Rollinson
,
S.
,
Doyotte
,
A.
et al.
(
2011
)
UBAP1 is a component of an endosome-specific ESCRT-I complex that is essential for MVB sorting
.
Curr. Biol.
21
,
1245
1250
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.028
51.
Morita
,
E.
,
Sandrin
,
V.
,
Alam
,
S.L.
,
Eckert
,
D.M.
,
Gygi
,
S.P.
and
Sundquist
,
W.I
. (
2007
)
Identification of human MVB12 proteins as ESCRT-I subunits that function in HIV budding
.
Cell Host Microbe
2
,
41
53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.003
52.
Strickland
,
M.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
,
Bonn
,
S.M.
,
Camara
,
C.M.
,
Starich
,
M.R.
,
Fushman
,
D.
et al.
(
2022
)
Tsg101/ESCRT-I recruitment regulated by the dual binding modes of K63-linked diubiquitin
.
Structure
30
,
289
299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2021.09.006
53.
Pornillos
,
O.
,
Alam
,
S.L.
,
Rich
,
R.L.
,
Myszka
,
D.G.
,
Davis
,
D.R.
and
Sundquist
,
W.I
. (
2002
)
Structure and functional interactions of the Tsg101 UEV domain
.
EMBO J.
21
,
2397
2406
https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.10.2397
54.
Wunderley
,
L.
,
Brownhill
,
K.
,
Stefani
,
F.
,
Tabernero
,
L.
and
Woodman
,
P
. (
2014
)
The molecular basis for selective assembly of the UBAP1-containing endosome-specific ESCRT-I complex
.
J. Cell. Sci.
127
,
663
672
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.140673
55.
Boura
,
E.
and
Hurley
,
J.H
. (
2012
)
Structural basis for membrane targeting by the MVB12-associated β-prism domain of the human ESCRT-I MVB12 subunit
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
109
,
1901
1906
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117597109
56.
Langelier
,
C.
,
Von Schwedler
,
U.K.
,
Fisher
,
R.D.
,
De Domenico
,
I.
,
White
,
P.L.
,
Hill
,
C.P.
et al.
(
2006
)
Human ESCRT-II complex and its role in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 release
.
J. Virol.
80
,
9465
9480
https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01049-06
57.
Im
,
Y.J.
and
Hurley
,
J.H
. (
2008
)
Integrated structural model and membrane targeting mechanism of the human ESCRT-II complex
.
Dev. Cell
14
,
902
913
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.04.004
58.
Hierro
,
A.
,
Sun
,
J.
,
Rusnak
,
A.S.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Prag
,
G.
,
Emr
,
S.D.
et al.
(
2004
)
Structure of the ESCRT-II endosomal trafficking complex
.
Nature
431
,
221
225
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02914
59.
Teo
,
H.
,
Gill
,
D.J.
,
Sun
,
J.
,
Perisic
,
O.
,
Veprintsev
,
D.B.
,
Vallis
,
Y.
et al.
(
2006
)
ESCRT-I core and ESCRT-II GLUE domain structures reveal role for GLUE in linking to ESCRT-I and membranes
.
Cell
125
,
99
111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.047
60.
Slagsvold
,
T.
,
Aasland
,
R.
,
Hirano
,
S.
,
Bache
,
K.G.
,
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Trambaiolo
,
D.
et al.
(
2005
)
Eap45 in mammalian ESCRT-II binds ubiquitin via a phosphoinositide-interacting GLUE domain
.
J. Biol. Chem.
280
,
19600
19606
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M501510200
61.
Carlson
,
L.A.
and
Hurley
,
J.H
. (
2012
)
In vitro reconstitution of the ordered assembly of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport at membrane-bound HIV-1 Gag clusters
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
109
,
16928
16933
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211759109
62.
Yorikawa
,
C.
,
Shibata
,
H.
,
Waguri
,
S.
,
Hatta
,
K.
,
Horii
,
M.
,
Katoh
,
K.
et al.
(
2005
)
Human CHMP6, a myristoylated ESCRT-III protein, interacts directly with an ESCRT-II component EAP20 and regulates endosomal cargo sorting
.
Biochem. J.
387
,
17
26
https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20041227
63.
Buysse
,
D.
,
Pfitzner
,
A.K.
,
West
,
M.
,
Roux
,
A.
and
Odorizzi
,
G
. (
2020
)
The ubiquitin hydrolase Doa4 directly binds Snf7 to inhibit recruitment of ESCRT-III remodeling factors in S. cerevisiae
.
J. Cell. Sci.
133
, jcs241455 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.241455
64.
Johnson
,
N.
,
West
,
M.
and
Odorizzi
,
G
. (
2017
)
Regulation of yeast ESCRT-III membrane scission activity by the Doa4 ubiquitin hydrolase
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
28
,
661
672
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-11-0761
65.
Richter
,
C.M.
,
West
,
M.
and
Odorizzi
,
G
. (
2013
)
Doa4 function in ILV budding is restricted through its interaction with the Vps20 subunit of ESCRT-III
.
J. Cell. Sci.
126
,
1881
1890
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.122499
66.
Mathieu
,
J.
,
Michel-Hissier
,
P.
,
Boucherit
,
V.
and
Huynh
,
J.R
. (
2022
)
The deubiquitinase USP8 targets ESCRT-III to promote incomplete cell division
.
Science
376
,
818
823
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg2653
67.
Crespo-Yàñez
,
X.
,
Aguilar-Gurrieri
,
C.
,
Jacomin
,
A.C.
,
Journet
,
A.
,
Mortier
,
M.
,
Taillebourg
,
E.
et al.
(
2018
)
CHMP1B is a target of USP8/UBPY regulated by ubiquitin during endocytosis
.
Plos Genet.
14
, e1007456 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007456
68.
McCullough
,
J.
and
Sundquist
,
W.I
. (
2020
)
Membrane remodeling: ESCRT-III filaments as molecular garrotes
.
Curr. Biol.
30
,
R1425
R1428
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.086
69.
Pfitzner
,
A.K.
,
Moser von Filseck
,
J.
and
Roux
,
A
. (
2021
)
Principles of membrane remodeling by dynamic ESCRT-III polymers
.
Trends Cell Biol.
31
,
856
868
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2021.04.005
70.
Schöneberg
,
J.
,
Pavlin
,
M.R.
,
Yan
,
S.
,
Righini
,
M.
,
Lee
,
I.H.
,
Carlson
,
L.A.
et al.
(
2018
)
ATP-dependent force generation and membrane scission by ESCRT-III and Vps4
.
Science
362
,
1423
1428
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1839
71.
Williams
,
R.L.
and
Urbé
,
S
. (
2007
)
The emerging shape of the ESCRT machinery
.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
8
,
355
368
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2162
72.
Raiborg
,
C.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2009
)
The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins
.
Nature
458
,
445
452
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07961
73.
Teis
,
D.
,
Saksena
,
S.
and
Emr
,
S.D
. (
2008
)
Ordered assembly of the ESCRT-III complex on endosomes is required to sequester cargo during MVB formation
.
Dev. Cell
15
,
578
589
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.013
74.
Pfitzner
,
A.K.
,
Mercier
,
V.
,
Jiang
,
X.
,
Moser von Filseck
,
J.
,
Baum
,
B.
,
Šarić
,
A.
et al.
(
2020
)
An ESCRT-III polymerization sequence drives membrane deformation and fission
.
Cell
182
,
1140
1155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.021
75.
Wollert
,
T.
,
Wunder
,
C.
,
Lippincott-Schwartz
,
J.
and
Hurley
,
J.H
. (
2009
)
Membrane scission by the ESCRT-III complex
.
Nature
458
,
172
177
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07836
76.
Bertin
,
A.
,
De Franceschi
,
N.
,
De la Mora
,
E.
,
Maity
,
S.
,
Alqabandi
,
M.
,
Miguet
,
N
, et al.
(
2020
)
Human ESCRT-III polymers assemble on positively curved membranes and induce helical membrane tube formation
.
Nat. Commun.
11
,
2663
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16368-5
77.
Mercier
,
V.
,
Larios
,
J.
,
Molinard
,
G.
,
Goujon
,
A.
,
Matile
,
S.
,
Gruenberg
,
J.
et al.
(
2020
)
Endosomal membrane tension regulates ESCRT-III-dependent intra-lumenal vesicle formation
.
Nat. Cell Biol.
22
,
947
959
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-020-0546-4
78.
Lee
,
I.H.
,
Kai
,
H.
,
Carlson
,
L.A.
,
Groves
,
J.T.
and
Hurley
,
J.H
. (
2015
)
Negative membrane curvature catalyzes nucleation of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-III assembly
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
112
,
15892
15897
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518765113
79.
Christ
,
L.
,
Wenzel
,
E.M.
,
Liestøl
,
K.
,
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Campsteijn
,
C.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2016
)
ALIX and ESCRT-I/II function as parallel ESCRT-III recruiters in cytokinetic abscission
.
J. Cell Biol.
212
,
499
513
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201507009
80.
Larios
,
J.
,
Mercier
,
V.
,
Roux
,
A.
and
Gruenberg
,
J
. (
2020
)
ALIX- and ESCRT-III-dependent sorting of tetraspanins to exosomes
.
J. Cell Biol.
219
, e201904113 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201904113
81.
Fisher
,
R.D.
,
Chung
,
H.Y.
,
Zhai
,
Q.
,
Robinson
,
H.
,
Sundquist
,
W.I.
and
Hill
,
C.P
. (
2007
)
Structural and biochemical studies of ALIX/AIP1 and its role in retrovirus budding
.
Cell
128
,
841
852
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.035
82.
Usami
,
Y.
,
Popov
,
S.
and
Göttlinger
,
H.G
. (
2007
)
Potent rescue of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 late domain mutants by ALIX/AIP1 depends on its CHMP4 binding site
.
J. Virol.
81
,
6614
6622
https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00314-07
83.
Gahloth
,
D.
,
Heaven
,
G.
,
Jowitt
,
T.A.
,
Mould
,
A.P.
,
Bella
,
J.
,
Baldock
,
C.
et al.
(
2017
)
The open architecture of HD-PTP phosphatase provides new insights into the mechanism of regulation of ESCRT function
.
Sci. Rep.
7
,
9151
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09467-9
84.
Ali
,
N.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Taylor
,
S.
,
Mironov
,
A.
,
Urbé
,
S.
and
Woodman
,
P
. (
2013
)
Recruitment of UBPY and ESCRT exchange drive HD-PTP-dependent sorting of EGFR to the MVB
.
Curr. Biol.
23
,
453
461
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.033
85.
Babst
,
M.
,
Katzmann
,
D.J.
,
Snyder
,
W.B.
,
Wendland
,
B.
and
Emr
,
S.D
. (
2002
)
Endosome-associated complex, ESCRT-II, recruits transport machinery for protein sorting at the multivesicular body
.
Dev. Cell
3
,
283
289
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00219-8
86.
Katzmann
,
D.J.
,
Babst
,
M.
and
Emr
,
S.D
. (
2001
)
Ubiquitin-dependent sorting into the multivesicular body pathway requires the function of a conserved endosomal protein sorting complex, ESCRT-I
.
Cell
106
,
145
155
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00434-2
87.
Laidlaw
,
K.M.E.
and
MacDonald
,
C
. (
2018
)
Endosomal trafficking of yeast membrane proteins
.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
46
,
1551
1558
https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20180258
88.
Horiuchi
,
H.
,
Lippé
,
R.
,
McBride
,
H.M.
,
Rubino
,
M.
,
Woodman
,
P.
,
Stenmark
,
H.
et al.
(
1997
)
A novel Rab5 GDP/GTP exchange factor complexed to Rabaptin-5 links nucleotide exchange to effector recruitment and function
.
Cell
90
,
1149
1159
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80380-3
89.
Hama
,
H.
,
Tall
,
G.G.
and
Horazdovsky
,
B.F
. (
1999
)
Vps9p is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor involved in vesicle-mediated vacuolar protein transport
.
J. Biol. Chem.
274
,
15284
15291
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.21.15284
90.
Ishida
,
M.
,
Oguchi
,
M.E.
and
Fukuda
,
M
. (
2016
)
Multiple types of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for Rab small GTPases
.
Cell Struct. Funct.
41
,
61
79
https://doi.org/10.1247/csf.16008
91.
Herman
,
E.K.
,
Ali
,
M.
,
Field
,
M.C.
and
Dacks
,
J.B
. (
2018
)
Regulation of early endosomes across eukaryotes: evolution and functional homology of Vps9 proteins
.
Traffic
19
,
546
563
https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12570
92.
Müller
,
M.P.
and
Goody
,
R.S
. (
2018
)
Molecular control of Rab activity by GEFs, GAPs and GDI
.
Small GTPases
9
,
5
21
https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2016.1276999
93.
Blümer
,
J.
,
Rey
,
J.
,
Dehmelt
,
L.
,
Mazel
,
T.
,
Wu
,
Y.W.
,
Bastiaens
,
P.
et al.
(
2013
)
RabGEFs are a major determinant for specific Rab membrane targeting
.
J. Cell Biol.
200
,
287
300
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201209113
94.
Zhang
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
T.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Gong
,
Z.
,
Tang
,
C.
,
Chen
,
J.
et al.
(
2014
)
Molecular mechanism for Rabex-5 GEF activation by Rabaptin-5
.
Elife
3
, e02687 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02687
95.
Lee
,
S.
,
Tsai
,
Y.C.
,
Mattera
,
R.
,
Smith
,
W.J.
,
Kostelansky
,
M.S.
,
Weissman
,
A.M.
et al.
(
2006
)
Structural basis for ubiquitin recognition and autoubiquitination by Rabex-5
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
13
,
264
271
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1064
96.
Mattera
,
R.
,
Tsai
,
Y.C.
,
Weissman
,
A.M.
and
Bonifacino
,
J.S
. (
2006
)
The Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rabex-5 binds ubiquitin (Ub) and functions as a Ub ligase through an atypical Ub-interacting motif and a zinc finger domain
.
J. Biol. Chem.
281
,
6874
6883
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509939200
97.
Penengo
,
L.
,
Mapelli
,
M.
,
Murachelli
,
A.G.
,
Confalonieri
,
S.
,
Magri
,
L.
,
Musacchio
,
A.
et al.
(
2006
)
Crystal structure of the ubiquitin binding domains of rabex-5 reveals two modes of interaction with ubiquitin
.
Cell
124
,
1183
1195
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.020
98.
Aikawa
,
Y.
,
Hirakawa
,
H.
and
Lee
,
S
. (
2012
)
Spatiotemporal regulation of the ubiquitinated cargo-binding activity of Rabex-5 in the endocytic pathway
.
J. Biol. Chem.
287
,
40586
40597
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.411793
99.
Shideler
,
T.
,
Nickerson
,
D.P.
,
Merz
,
A.J.
and
Odorizzi
,
G
. (
2015
)
Ubiquitin binding by the CUE domain promotes endosomal localization of the Rab5 GEF Vps9
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
26
,
1345
1356
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1156
100.
Zhu
,
H.
,
Zhu
,
G.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Liang
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
X.C.
and
Li
,
G
. (
2007
)
Rabaptin-5-independent membrane targeting and Rab5 activation by Rabex-5 in the cell
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
18
,
4119
4128
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0100
101.
Zhu
,
H.P.
,
Liang
,
Z.M.
and
Li
,
G.P
. (
2009
)
Rabex-5 Is a Rab22 effector and mediates a Rab22-Rab5 signaling cascade in endocytosis
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
20
,
4720
4729
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0453
102.
Zhu
,
G.Y.
,
Zhai
,
P.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Terzyan
,
S.
,
Li
,
G.P.
and
Zhang
,
X.J.C
. (
2004
)
Structural basis of Rab5-Rabaptin5 interaction in endocytosis
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
11
,
975
983
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb832
103.
Zhu
,
H.
,
Qian
,
H.
and
Li
,
G
. (
2010
)
Delayed onset of positive feedback activation of Rab5 by Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5 in endocytosis
.
PLoS ONE
5
, e9226 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009226
104.
Lippé
,
R.
,
Miaczynska
,
M.
,
Rybin
,
V.
,
Runge
,
A.
and
Zerial
,
M
. (
2001
)
Functional synergy between Rab5 effector Rabaptin-5 and exchange factor Rabex-5 when physically associated in a complex
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
12
,
2219
2228
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.7.2219
105.
Delprato
,
A.
and
Lambright
,
D.G
. (
2007
)
Structural basis for Rab GTPase activation by VPS9 domain exchange factors
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
14
,
406
412
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1232
106.
Kälin
,
S.
,
Hirschmann
,
D.T.
,
Buser
,
D.P.
and
Spiess
,
M
. (
2015
)
Rabaptin5 is recruited to endosomes by Rab4 and Rabex5 to regulate endosome maturation
.
J. Cell. Sci.
128
,
4126
4137
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.174664
107.
Kälin
,
S.
,
Buser
,
D.P.
and
Spiess
,
M
. (
2016
)
A fresh look at the function of Rabaptin5 on endosomes
.
Small GTPases
7
,
34
37
https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2016.1140616
108.
Delprato
,
A.
,
Merithew
,
E.
and
Lambright
,
D.G
. (
2004
)
Structure, exchange determinants, and family-wide rab specificity of the tandem helical bundle and Vps9 domains of Rabex-5
.
Cell
118
,
607
617
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.009
109.
Lauer
,
J.
,
Segeletz
,
S.
,
Cezanne
,
A.
,
Guaitoli
,
G.
,
Raimondi
,
F.
,
Gentzel
,
M.
et al.
(
2019
)
Auto-regulation of Rab5 GEF activity in Rabex5 by allosteric structural changes, catalytic core dynamics and ubiquitin binding
.
Elife
8
, e46302 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46302
110.
Franke
,
C.
,
Repnik
,
U.
,
Segeletz
,
S.
,
Brouilly
,
N.
,
Kalaidzidis
,
Y.
,
Verbavatz
,
J.M.
et al.
(
2019
)
Correlative single-molecule localization microscopy and electron tomography reveals endosome nanoscale domains
.
Traffic
20
,
601
617
https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12671
111.
Yuan
,
W.
and
Song
,
C
. (
2020
)
The emerging role of Rab5 in membrane receptor trafficking and signaling pathways
.
Biochem. Res. Int.
2020
, 4186308 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4186308
112.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Jiang
,
Z.
and
Shi
,
A
. (
2022
)
Rab GTPases: the principal players in crafting the regulatory landscape of endosomal trafficking
.
Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.
20
,
4464
4472
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.016
113.
Cezanne
,
A.
,
Lauer
,
J.
,
Solomatina
,
A.
,
Sbalzarini
,
I.F.
and
Zerial
,
M
. (
2020
)
A non-linear system patterns Rab5 GTPase on the membrane
.
Elife
9
, e54434 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54434
114.
Buckles
,
T.C.
,
Ohashi
,
Y.
,
Tremel
,
S.
,
McLaughlin
,
S.H.
,
Pardon
,
E.
,
Steyaert
,
J.
et al.
(
2020
)
The G-Protein Rab5A activates VPS34 complex II, a class III PI3K, by a dual regulatory mechanism
.
Biophys. J.
119
,
2205
2218
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2020.10.028
115.
Tremel
,
S.
,
Ohashi
,
Y.
,
Morado
,
D.R.
,
Bertram
,
J.
,
Perisic
,
O.
,
Brandt
,
L.T.L.
et al.
(
2021
)
Structural basis for VPS34 kinase activation by Rab1 and Rab5 on membranes
.
Nat. Commun.
12
,
1564
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21695-2
116.
Poteryaev
,
D.
,
Fares
,
H.
,
Bowerman
,
B.
and
Spang
,
A
. (
2007
)
Caenorhabditis elegans SAND-1 is essential for RAB-7 function in endosomal traffic
.
EMBO J.
26
,
301
312
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601498
117.
Van den Boomen
,
D.J.H.
,
Sienkiewicz
,
A.
,
Berlin
,
I.
,
Jongsma
,
M.L.M.
,
Van Elsland
,
D.M.
,
Luzio
,
J.P.
et al.
(
2020
)
A trimeric Rab7 GEF controls NPC1-dependent lysosomal cholesterol export
.
Nat. Commun.
11
,
5559
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19032-0
118.
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Borchers
,
A.C.
,
Herrmann
,
E.
,
Füllbrunn
,
N.
,
Han
,
Y.
,
Perz
,
A.
et al.
(
2020
)
A conserved and regulated mechanism drives endosomal Rab transition
.
Elife
9
, e56090 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56090
119.
Herrmann
,
E.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Auffarth
,
K.
,
Ungermann
,
C.
and
Kümmel
,
D
. (
2023
)
Targeting of the Mon1-Ccz1 Rab guanine nucleotide exchange factor to distinct organelles by a synergistic protein and lipid code
.
J. Biol. Chem.
299
, 102915 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102915
120.
Cabrera
,
M.
,
Nordmann
,
M.
,
Perz
,
A.
,
Schmedt
,
D.
,
Gerondopoulos
,
A.
,
Barr
,
F.
et al.
(
2014
)
The Mon1-Ccz1 GEF activates the Rab7 GTPase Ypt7 via a longin-fold-Rab interface and association with PI3P-positive membranes
.
J. Cell. Sci.
127
,
1043
1051
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.140921
121.
Klink
,
B.U.
,
Herrmann
,
E.
,
Antoni
,
C.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Kiontke
,
S.
,
Gatsogiannis
,
C.
et al.
(
2022
)
Structure of the Mon1-Ccz1 complex reveals molecular basis of membrane binding for Rab7 activation
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
119
, e2121494119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121494119
122.
Dehnen
,
L.
,
Janz
,
M.
,
Verma
,
J.K.
,
Psathaki
,
O.E.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Fröhlich
,
F.
et al.
(
2020
)
A trimeric metazoan Rab7 GEF complex is crucial for endocytosis and scavenger function
.
J. Cell. Sci.
133
, jcs247080 https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.247080
123.
Vaites
,
L.P.
,
Paulo
,
J.A.
,
Huttlin
,
E.L.
and
Harper
,
J.W
. (
2018
)
Systematic analysis of human cells lacking ATG8 proteins uncovers roles for GABARAPs and the CCZ1/MON1 regulator C18orf8/RMC1 in macroautophagic and selective autophagic flux
.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
38
, e00392 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00392-17
124.
Yong
,
X.
,
Jia
,
G.
,
Liu
,
Z.
,
Zhou
,
C.
,
Yi
,
J.
,
Tang
,
Y.
et al.
(
2023
)
Cryo-EM structure of the Mon1-Ccz1-RMC1 complex reveals molecular basis of metazoan RAB7A activation
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
120
, e2301725120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301725120
125.
Herrmann
,
E.
,
Schäfer
,
J.H.
,
Wilmes
,
S.
,
Ungermann
,
C.
,
Moeller
,
A.
and
Kümmel
,
D
. (
2023
)
Structure of the metazoan Rab7 GEF complex Mon1-Ccz1-Bulli
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
120
, e2301908120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301908120
126.
Kinchen
,
J.M.
and
Ravichandran
,
K.S
. (
2010
)
Identification of two evolutionarily conserved genes regulating processing of engulfed apoptotic cells
.
Nature
464
,
778
782
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08853
127.
Gerondopoulos
,
A.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Liang
,
J.R.
,
Linford
,
A.
and
Barr
,
F.A
. (
2012
)
BLOC-3 mutated in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome is a Rab32/38 guanine nucleotide exchange factor
.
Curr. Biol.
22
,
2135
2139
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.020
128.
Yousefian
,
J.
,
Troost
,
T.
,
Grawe
,
F.
,
Sasamura
,
T.
,
Fortini
,
M.
and
Klein
,
T
. (
2013
)
Dmon1 controls recruitment of Rab7 to maturing endosomes in Drosophila
.
J. Cell. Sci.
126
,
1583
1594
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.114934
129.
Borchers
,
A.C.
,
Janz
,
M.
,
Schäfer
,
J.H.
,
Moeller
,
A.
,
Kümmel
,
D.
,
Paululat
,
A.
et al.
(
2023
)
Regulatory sites in the Mon1-Ccz1 complex control Rab5 to Rab7 transition and endosome maturation
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
120
, e2303750120 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303750120
130.
Cui
,
Y.
,
Zhao
,
Q.
,
Gao
,
C.
,
Ding
,
Y.
,
Zeng
,
Y.
,
Ueda
,
T.
et al.
(
2014
)
Activation of the Rab7 GTPase by the MON1-CCZ1 complex is essential for PVC-to-vacuole trafficking and plant growth in arabidopsis
.
Plant Cell
26
,
2080
2097
https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.123141
131.
Nordmann
,
M.
,
Cabrera
,
M.
,
Perz
,
A.
,
Bröcker
,
C.
,
Ostrowicz
,
C.
,
Engelbrecht-Vandré
,
S.
et al.
(
2010
)
The Mon1-Ccz1 complex is the GEF of the late endosomal Rab7 homolog Ypt7
.
Curr. Biol.
20
,
1654
1659
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.002
132.
Kiontke
,
S.
,
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Kuhlee
,
A.
,
Schuback
,
S.
,
Raunser
,
S.
,
Ungermann
,
C.
et al.
(
2017
)
Architecture and mechanism of the late endosomal Rab7-like Ypt7 guanine nucleotide exchange factor complex Mon1-Ccz1
.
Nat. Commun.
8
, 14034 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14034
133.
Stroupe
,
C
. (
2018
)
This is the end: regulation of Rab7 nucleotide binding in endolysosomal trafficking and autophagy
.
Front. Cell Dev. Biol.
6
, 129 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00129
134.
Langemeyer
,
L.
,
Fröhlich
,
F.
and
Ungermann
,
C
. (
2018
)
Rab GTPase function in endosome and lysosome biogenesis
.
Trends Cell Biol.
28
,
957
970
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.007
135.
Homma
,
Y.
,
Hiragi
,
S.
and
Fukuda
,
M
. (
2021
)
Rab family of small GTPases: an updated view on their regulation and functions
.
FEBS J.
288
,
36
55
https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15453
136.
Haas
,
A.K.
,
Fuchs
,
E.
,
Kopajtich
,
R.
and
Barr
,
F.A
. (
2005
)
A GTPase-activating protein controls Rab5 function in endocytic trafficking
.
Nat. Cell Biol.
7
,
887
893
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1290
137.
Coudert
,
L.
,
Osseni
,
A.
,
Gangloff
,
Y.G.
,
Schaeffer
,
L.
and
Leblanc
,
P
. (
2021
)
The ESCRT-0 subcomplex component Hrs/Hgs is a master regulator of myogenesis via modulation of signaling and degradation pathways
.
BMC Biol.
19
,
153
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01091-4
138.
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Bache
,
K.G.
,
Mehlum
,
A.
,
Stang
,
E.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2001
)
Hrs recruits clathrin to early endosomes
.
EMBO J.
20
,
5008
5021
https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.17.5008
139.
Pons
,
V.
,
Luyet
,
P.P.
,
Morel
,
E.
,
Abrami
,
L.
,
Van der Goot
,
F.G.
,
Parton
,
R.G.
et al.
(
2008
)
Hrs and SNX3 functions in sorting and membrane invagination within multivesicular bodies
.
Plos Biol.
6
, e214 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060214
140.
Suzuki
,
S.W.
,
West
,
M.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Fan
,
J.S.
,
Roberts
,
R.T.
,
Odorizzi
,
G.
et al.
(
2024
)
A role for Vps13-mediated lipid transfer at the ER-endosome contact site in ESCRT-mediated sorting
.
J. Cell Biol.
223
, e202307094 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202307094
141.
Mayers
,
J.R.
,
Fyfe
,
I.
,
Schuh
,
A.L.
,
Chapman
,
E.R.
,
Edwardson
,
J.M.
and
Audhya
,
A
. (
2011
)
ESCRT-0 assembles as a heterotetrameric complex on membranes and binds multiple ubiquitinylated cargoes simultaneously
.
J. Biol. Chem.
286
,
9636
9645
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.185363
142.
Norris
,
A.
,
Tammineni
,
P.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Gerdes
,
J.
,
Murr
,
A.
,
Kwan
,
K.Y.
et al.
(
2017
)
SNX-1 and RME-8 oppose the assembly of HGRS-1/ESCRT-0 degradative microdomains on endosomes
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
114
,
E307
E316
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612730114
143.
Michelet
,
X.
,
Alberti
,
A.
,
Benkemoun
,
L.
,
Roudier
,
N.
,
Lefebvre
,
C.
and
Legouis
,
R
. (
2009
)
The ESCRT-III protein CeVPS-32 is enriched in domains distinct from CeVPS-27 and CeVPS-23 at the endosomal membrane of epithelial cells
.
Biol. Cell
101
,
599
615
https://doi.org/10.1042/BC20090025
144.
Maxfield
,
F.R.
and
McGraw
,
T.E
. (
2004
)
Endocytic recycling
.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
5
,
121
132
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1315
145.
Wenzel
,
E.M.
,
Schultz
,
S.W.
,
Schink
,
K.O.
,
Pedersen
,
N.M.
,
Nähse
,
V.
,
Carlson
,
A.
et al.
(
2018
)
Concerted ESCRT and clathrin recruitment waves define the timing and morphology of intraluminal vesicle formation
.
Nat. Commun.
9
,
2932
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05345-8
146.
Doyotte
,
A.
,
Russell
,
M.R.G.
,
Hopkins
,
C.R.
and
Woodman
,
P.G
. (
2005
)
Depletion of TSG101 forms a mammalian “Class E” compartment: a multicisternal early endosome with multiple sorting defects
.
J. Cell. Sci.
118
,
3003
3017
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02421
147.
Razi
,
M.
and
Futter
,
C.E
. (
2006
)
Distinct roles for Tsg101 and Hrs in multivesicular body formation and inward vesiculation
.
Mol. Biol. Cell
17
,
3469
3483
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1054
148.
Raiborg
,
C.
,
Malerød
,
L.
,
Pedersen
,
N.M.
and
Stenmark
,
H
. (
2008
)
Differential functions of Hrs and ESCRT proteins in endocytic membrane trafficking
.
Exp. Cell Res.
314
,
801
813
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.10.014
149.
Djeddi
,
A.
,
Michelet
,
X.
,
Culetto
,
E.
,
Alberti
,
A.
,
Barois
,
N.
and
Legouis
,
R
. (
2012
)
Induction of autophagy in ESCRT mutants is an adaptive response for cell survival in C. elegans
.
J. Cell. Sci.
125
,
685
694
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.091702
150.
Huynh
,
J.M.
,
Dang
,
H.
,
Munoz-Tucker
,
I.A.
,
O’Ketch
,
M.
,
Liu
,
I.T.
,
Perno
,
S.
et al.
(
2016
)
ESCRT-dependent cell death in a caenorhabditis elegans model of the lysosomal storage disorder mucolipidosis type IV
.
Genetics
202
,
619
638
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.182485
151.
Rink
,
J.
,
Ghigo
,
E.
,
Kalaidzidis
,
Y.
and
Zerial
,
M
. (
2005
)
Rab conversion as a mechanism of progression from early to late endosomes
.
Cell
122
,
735
749
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.043
152.
Ma
,
H.
,
Wardega
,
P.
,
Mazaud
,
D.
,
Klosowska-Wardega
,
A.
,
Jurek
,
A.
,
Engström
,
U.
et al.
(
2015
)
Histidine-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase regulates platelet-derived growth factor receptor intracellular sorting and degradation
.
Cell. Signal.
27
,
2209
2219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.07.020
153.
Clague
,
M.J.
and
Urbé
,
S
. (
2006
)
Endocytosis: the DUB version
.
Trends Cell Biol.
16
,
551
559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.002
This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).