Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Cecilia M. Lotufo
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Articles
Cristina Daneri-Becerra, Nadia R. Zgajnar, Cecilia M. Lotufo, Ana B. Ramos Hryb, Graciela Piwien-Pilipuk, Mario D. Galigniana
Biochem Soc Trans (2019) BST20190334.
Published: 22 November 2019
Abstract
FKBP51 and FKBP52 are two iconic members of the family of peptidyl-prolyl-( cis/trans )-isomerases (EC: 5.2.1.8), which comprises proteins that catalyze the cis/trans isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl peptide bonds in unfolded and partially folded polypeptide chains and native state proteins. Originally, both proteins have been studied as molecular chaperones belonging to the steroid receptor heterocomplex, where they were first discovered. In addition to their expected role in receptor folding and chaperoning, FKBP51 and FKBP52 are also involved in many biological processes, such as signal transduction, transcriptional regulation, protein transport, cancer development, and cell differentiation, just to mention a few examples. Recent studies have revealed that both proteins are subject of post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, SUMOlyation, and acetylation. In this work, we summarize recent advances in the study of these immunophilins portraying them as scaffolding proteins capable to organize protein heterocomplexes, describing some of their antagonistic properties in the physiology of the cell, and the putative regulation of their properties by those post-translational modifications.
Articles
Gisela I. Mazaira, Cristina Daneri-Becerra, Nadia R. Zgajnar, Cecilia M. Lotufo, Mario D. Galigniana
Biochem Soc Trans (2018) 46 (1): 51-65.
Published: 22 December 2017
Abstract
The ability to permit gene expression is managed by a set of relatively well known regulatory mechanisms. Nonetheless, this property can also be acquired during a life span as a consequence of environmental stimuli. Interestingly, some acquired information can be passed to the next generation of individuals without modifying gene information, but instead by the manner in which cells read and process such information. Molecular chaperones are classically related to the proper preservation of protein folding and anti-aggregation properties, but one of them, heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90), is a refined sensor of protein function facilitating the biological activity of properly folded client proteins that already have a preserved tertiary structure. Interestingly, Hsp90 can also function as a critical switch able to regulate biological responses due to its association with key client proteins such as histone deacetylases or DNA methylases. Thus, a growing amount of evidence has connected the action of Hsp90 to post-translational modifications of soluble nuclear factors, DNA, and histones, which epigenetically affect gene expression upon the onset of an unfriendly environment. This response is commanded by the activation of the transcription factor heat-shock factor 1 (HSF1). Even though numerous stresses of diverse nature are known to trigger the stress response by activation of HSF1, it is still unknown whether there are different types of molecular sensors for each type of stimulus. In the present review, we will discuss various aspects of the regulatory action of HSF1 and Hsp90 on transcriptional regulation, and how this regulation may affect genetic assimilation mechanisms and the health of individuals.