GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor) signalling at the plasma membrane is under tight control. In the case of neuropeptides such as SP (substance P), plasma membrane signalling is regulated by cell-surface endopeptidases (e.g. neprilysin) that degrade extracellular neuropeptides, and receptor interaction with β-arrestins, which uncouple receptors from heterotrimeric G-proteins and mediate receptor endocytosis. By recruiting GPCRs, kinases and phosphatases to endocytosed GPCRs, β-arrestins assemble signalosomes that can mediate a second wave of signalling by internalized receptors. Endosomal peptidases, such as ECE-1 (endothelin-converting enzyme-1), can degrade SP in acidified endosomes, which destabilizes signalosomes and allows receptors, freed from β-arrestins, to recycle and resensitize. By disassembling signalosomes, ECE-1 terminates β-arrestin-mediated endosomal signalling. These mechanisms have been studied in model cell systems, and the relative importance of plasma membrane and endosomal signalling to complex pathophysiological processes, such as inflammation, pain and proliferation, is unclear. However, deletion or inhibition of metalloendopeptidases that control neuropeptide signalling at the plasma membrane and in endosomes has marked effects on inflammation. Neprilysin deletion exacerbates inflammation because of diminished degradation of pro-inflammatory SP. Conversely, inhibition of ECE-1 attenuates inflammation by preventing receptor recycling/resensitization, which is required for sustained pro-inflammatory signals from the plasma membrane. β-Arrestin deletion also affects inflammation because of the involvement of β-arrestins in pro-inflammatory signalling and migration of inflammatory cells. Knowledge of GPCR signalling in specific subcellular locations provides insights into pathophysiological processes, and can provide new opportunities for therapy. Selective targeting of β-arrestin-mediated endosomal signalling or of mechanisms of receptor recycling/resensitization may offer more effective and selective treatments than global targeting of cell-surface signalling.

The dynamic character of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) is essential to their function. However, the details of how ligands and signalling proteins stabilize a receptor conformation to trigger the activation of a given signalling pathway remain largely unexplored. Multiple data, including recent results obtained with the purified ghrelin receptor, suggest a model where ligand efficacy and functional selectivity are directly related to different receptor conformations. Importantly, distinct effector proteins (G-proteins and arrestins) as well as ligands are likely to affect the conformational landscape of GPCRs in different manners, as we show with the isolated ghrelin receptor. Such modulation of the GPCR conformational landscape by pharmacologically distinct ligands and effector proteins has major implications for the design of new drugs that activate specific signalling pathways.

Ligand bias refers to the ability of a drug at a receptor to activate selectively particular cell signalling pathways over others, in a way that cannot be explained by traditional models of receptor theory. For a physiologically and therapeutically important GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptor) such as the MOPr (μ-opioid receptor), the role of ligand bias is currently being explored, not only in order to understand the molecular function of this receptor, but also with a view to developing better analgesic drugs with fewer adverse effects. In this short review, the ways to detect and quantify agonist bias at MOPr are discussed, along with the possible significance of MOPr ligand bias in the therapeutic use of opioid drugs. An important conclusion of this work is that attempts to define ligand bias at any GPCR on the basis of the visual inspection of concentration–response curves or comparison of maximum response ( E max ) values can be misleading. Instead, reliable estimations of relative agonist efficacy are needed to calculate bias effectively.

The kinetics of G-protein-coupled receptor activation and deactivation has, so far, been measured only indirectly, most frequently by assessing the production of various second messengers. We have developed methods based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer to quantify the kinetics of receptor activation by agonist (measured as conformational change in the receptor), the kinetics of G-protein activation (measured as G-protein subunit rearrangement) and the kinetics of receptor inactivation by arrestins (measured as receptor–arrestin interaction). Using these methods, we show that receptor activation by agonists and signalling to G-proteins occur on the subsecond time scale, whereas receptor desensitization is limited by receptor phosphorylation and proceeds more slowly.

PDE4 cAMP phosphodiesterases are widely expressed enzymes that serve as major regulators of cAMP signalling in cells. They provide targets for therapeutics having anti-inflammatory and cognitive-enhancing properties. ERK2 (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 2) interacts with the PDE4 catalytic unit by binding to a KIM (kinase interaction motif) docking site located on an exposed β-hairpin loop and an FQF (Phe-Gln-Phe) specificity site located on an exposed α-helix. These flank a site that allows phosphorylation by ERK, the functional outcome of which is orchestrated by the N-terminal UCR1/2 (upstream conserved region 1 and 2) modules. The three classes of PDE4 isoforms differ in these regulatory modules, allowing phosphorylation by ERK to lead to either inhibition or activation. ERK inhibition of long isoforms is regulated by a unique feedback control whereby elevated cAMP levels cause PKA (protein kinase A) to phosphorylate UCR1 and ablate the inhibitory action of ERK. PDE4 isoforms can also be found in complex with β-arrestins where they provide a novel part of the cellular desensitization mechanism to receptor-mediated cAMP signalling. Stimulation of the β 2 -adrenoceptor recruits β-arrestins with bound PDE4, delivering an enzyme capable of degrading cAMP at its site of synthesis at the plasma membrane. Use of dominant negative PDE4 isoforms identifies that a major role of recruited PDE4 is to regulate plasma membrane PKA activity involved in phosphorylating the β 2 -adrenoceptor. Recruited PDE4 thus desensitizes the ability of the β 2 -adrenoceptor to activate ERK via G i .