The regulatory role of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in the growth and insulin production of the islet organ in vitro has been investigated. The effects of dibutyryl cyclic AMP (dbcAMP), theophylline, and 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) on DNA replication and on the biosynthesis of RNA and insulin in fetal rat islets of Langerhans maintained in tissue culture have been studied. Raising the glucose concentration from 2.7 mM to 16.7 mM caused a two-fold increase in DNA replication. Both dbcAMP and theophylline markedly inhibited the DNA replication at all glucose Concentrations studied. Low concentrations of IBMX stimulated DNA synthesis. However, at higher concentrations of this drug, known to considerably increase the islet cAMP levels, a marked inhibition of islet DNA replication was observed. Both (pro)insulin and total protein biosynthesis were stimulated by glucose, whereas dbcAMP stimulated only the (pro)insulin biosynthesis. Since glucose is known to raise islet intracellular levels of cAMP, which is known to be an inhibitor of cellular proliferation, the observed glucose stimulation of both islet-cell DNA replication and insulin production appeared conflicting. It is suggested that this dual effect of glucose may depend on a stimulation of proliferation in a limited pool of islet cells which may not exhibit an increase in cAMP.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 01 1982
Effects of cyclic AMP on DNA replication and protein biosynthesis in fetal rat islets of Langerhans maintained in tissue culture
I. Swenne
I. Swenne
1Department of Medical Cell Biology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Portland Press Ltd
Received:
September 14 1982
Online ISSN: 1573-4935
Print ISSN: 0144-8463
© 1982 The Biochemical Society
1982
Biosci Rep (1982) 2 (11): 867–876.
Article history
Received:
September 14 1982
Citation
I. Swenne; Effects of cyclic AMP on DNA replication and protein biosynthesis in fetal rat islets of Langerhans maintained in tissue culture. Biosci Rep 1 November 1982; 2 (11): 867–876. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114892
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Biochemical Society Member Sign in
Sign InSign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionGet Access To This Article
Open Access for all
We offer compliant routes for all authors from 2025. With library support, there will be no author nor reader charges in 5 journals. Check here |
![]() |