The present work aimed to probe into the effect of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) LINC00152 on gastric cancer (GC) cells proliferation by regulating miR-193a-3p and its target gene MCL1. Transfected si-LINC00152 was used to down-regulate LINC00152, and cells proliferation was measured by the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle were analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM). Besides, we also detected the potential functional effects of differential expression of LINC00152 in vivo using nude mouse xenograft model. We overexpressed and downexpressed miR-193a-3p to study the in vitro effect of miR-193a-3p on GC cells proliferation and vitality. And MCL1 was silenced by shRNA to investigate the effect of MCL1 on proliferation of GC cells. In this research, LINC00152 was proven to have a higher expression level in GC tissues than in the adjacent normal tissues. GC cells proliferation was inhibited after LINC00152 was down-regulated. LINC00152 inhibited the expression of miR-193a-3p, which negatively regulated MCL1. In addition, GC cells proliferation was inhibited by cell transfection with shRNA-MCL1, and enhanced by transfection with miR-193a-3p mimics. Our study suggested that LINC00152 was overexpressed in GC tissues, and it down-regulated miR-193a-3p to enhance MCL1 expression thereby promoting GC cells proliferation.
Amongst the most critical malignant neoplasms, gastric cancer (GC) is the second common leading cause of deaths relevant to cancer around the world . Lamentably, early GC is difficult to diagnose because there are usually no specific symptoms, and remedial surgery is not an alternative for diagnosis . To provide the foundation for molecular treatment approaches, it is necessary to have a clear understanding of molecular mechanisms behind the development and progression of GC .
Myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL1) is one of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins with a short half-life period, and previous work has demonstrated that up-regulation of MCL1 might inhibit apoptosis, chemoresistance, and cell cycle progression of tumor cells . Moreover, some researchers have found that MCL1 was overexpressed in a lot of human neoplasms. For example, the overexpression of MCL1 regulates the cell growth in gastric neoplasms, being an obstacle of apoptotic signaling . As a result, appropriately regulating the expression level of MCL1 becomes a significant issue in GC treatment. The importance must be attached to tight regulation of MCL1 expression in all kinds of biological processes related to gastric neoplasms .
In the last decade, advanced genomic analysis of genes expression has showed much more genetic transcription than hitherto expected. And the lion’s share of the genome was reported to be transcribed into non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) . Though ncRNAs were considered to be ‘noise’ at the beginning, piling up evidence has pointed out that ncRNAs, ranging from the small RNAs like miRNAs, siRNAs, piRNAs to the long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), serve as an important part in gene expression . Recently, the new-found ncRNA, LINC00152, has been reported to be overexpressed in GC, which strongly indicates a relationship between LINC00152 and GC cells proliferation . Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that overexpression of LINC00152 was positively correlated with larger tumor volume, tumor invasion depth, higher TNM stage, and poorer livability . Though LINC00152 was confirmed to play a critical role in the pathologic process of GC, the specific mechanism of LINC00152 involved and its target proteins or signaling pathway remained unknown .
MiRNAs are also a member of ncRNAs family with small volume (~20 nts), and miRNAs binding to the target mRNAs, regulating proteins expression by three approaches: controlling translation, increasing degradation of the target mRNA, and promoting translation at the post-transcriptional level . MiRNAs, each has hundreds of target regions, can regulate the majority of genetic pathways and bind up to 30% of human genes . It has been shown that down-regulation of miR-193-3p inhibits proliferation, migration, and chemotherapy resistance of tumor cells in GC through regulating PTEN gene . Besides, previous work has confirmed that the transfection of miR-193a-3p decreases the expression of MCL1, and MCL1 is a direct target of miR-193a-3p . Furthermore, an interesting discovery is that LINC00152 works as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) through sponging miR-193a-3p and shares the identical responsive elements of miR-193a-3p with some signaling pathway factor like erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4 (ERBB4) .
In this work, we worked over the relationship between LINC00152 expression and the cell multiplication of GC, and we verified both in vivo and in vitro that LINC00152 promoted gastric cells proliferation by regulating miR-193a-3p and its target gene MCL1.
Cell culture and tissue samples
A total of 20 GC tissues and adjacent normal tissue samples were collected from patients undergoing curative cancer surgery at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Before the endoscopy examination, there was no chemotherapy or radiotherapy. After freshly freezing under liquid nitrogen, the specimens were stored at −80°C. Informed consent was obtained from all patients with experimental protocols receiving approval from the Ethics Committee of Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. All patients were diagnosed with GC according to histological examination. The tissue samples were reviewed independently by three pathologists.
Based on the GPL570 platform and its correlated gene-expression profiling, GSE54129 was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE54129 contained 111 cancer tissues and 21 normal adjacent tissues. Cut-off value for dysregulated lncRNAs was set at >two-fold change (FC) and P-value was <0.05.
Four GC cell lines (MGC-803, AGS, SGC-7901, and BGC-823) along with the normal gastric epithelial cell line (GES-1) were purchased from the BeNa Culture Collection (BNCC, Shanghai, China). The cells were incubated in 90% RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, #31800022) together with 10% FBS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.), and they were grown in adapt circumstances at 37°C with 5% CO2.
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
Expression levels of LINC00152, miR-193a-3p, and MCL1 were determined by qRT-PCR. RNAs were extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) in light of the manufacturer’s protocol. The miRNA isolation was carried out from the total RNA using mirVana™ miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.) was used for quantitation, and afterward, RT-PCR was conducted by ReverTra Ace qPCR-RT Kit (Toyobo, Japan) as described in the protocol of the reagents. The obtained product was then analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR analysis using THUNDERBIRD SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Japan). The relative expressions were normalized to GAPDH or U6. The relative expression results were computed by 2−ΔΔCT. The primers (Sangon, Biotech, Shanghai, China) used are shown in Table 1.
Abbreviations: F, Forward primer; R, reverse primer.
MiR-193a-3p mimics, miR-193a-3p inhibitor, and pcDNA3.1 plasmid vectors were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The following groups were set: negative control (NC) group to be the group transfected with pcDNA3.1 empty plasmid vector, mimics group to be the group transfected with both miR-193a-3p mimics and pcDNA3.1 empty plasmid vector, inhibitor group to be the group transfected with both miR-193a-3p inhibitor and pcDNA3.1 empty plasmid vector, LINC00152 + mimics (mix) group to be the group transfected with miR-193a-3p mimics + pcDNA3.1-LINC00152. The sh-MCL1 and overexpressed MCL1 were transiently transfected to GC cells by Lipofectamine 2000. AGS and BGC-823 cell lines were incubated in six-well plates and transfected by Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.) 24 h later. Cells were grown in adapt circumstances at 37°C with 5% CO2, and harvested at 48 h after transfection for further analysis. In animal study, AGS cells were stably transfected with sh-Ctrl or sh-linc00152 and then screened using 1 μg/ml puromycin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) 48 h after the transfection. Stable clones were picked every 7 days of selection. Linc00152 expression levels were detected by qRT-PCR.
Colony formation assay
Cells were digested with trypsin into single-cell suspensions at 48 h after transfection, and they were incubated in six-well plates containing 10 ml of prewarm RPMI-1640 medium. Cells were cultured in adapt circumstances at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 1 or 2 weeks, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min followed by staining with GIMSA (Seebio, Shanghai, China) for 15–30 min. Visible colonies were manually counted.
Cell counting kit-8 assay
The ability of cells proliferation was assayed using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) (Biotech Well, Shanghai, China) in light of the manufacturer’s instructions. Logarithmically growing AGS and BGC-823 cells were taken out and digested with 0.25% (v/v) trypsin into single-cell suspensions, and the transfected cells were seeded in flat-bottom. Cells were cultured in adapt circumstances at 37°C with 5% CO2. CCK-8 was detected at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The optical density (OD) was determined by a microplate reader at 450 nm.
Flow cytometry assay
AGS and BGC-823 cells transfected were harvested 72 h after transfection by trypsinization. Supernatant of the mixture was discarded after centrifugation. The cells were fixed in 75% ethanol at 4°C for 4 h after washing with PBS. PI and RNase were used for staining. The cells for cell cycle analysis were then analyzed by FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, U.S.A.). The data were analyzed using FACS Diva (BD, U.S.A.) software.
Tumor formation assay in a nude mouse model
After stably transfecting and harvesting, washed AGS and BGC-823 cells were resuspended. Then suspended cells were injected into the left side of the posterior flank of each mouse subcutaneously, at an inoculation depth of 1 cm. Tumor growth was examined twice every week, and the volumes of tumors were computed by V = 0.5 × D × d2 , where V refers to volume; D means longitudinal diameter; and d stands for latitudinal diameter. At 4 weeks after injection, mice were mercifully killed, and then the subcutaneous growth of tumors was examined for later molecular analysis, immunohistochemistry, and Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining assay.
The paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were cut into sections amongst the injection site and the growth and invasion of implanted tumor were observed by routine HE staining. All tissues were fixed for 1–3 s in 4% paraformaldehyde and then rinsed with running water, followed by 60-s Hematoxylin staining. After staining with Hematoxylin and rinsing with running water, the sections were soaked in hydrochloric acid solutions for 1–2 s, rinsed with running water, and then immersed in ammonia for 1–2 s. Then, the sections were rinsed with running water again, stained with Eosin solution for 30 s, followed by being rapidly dehydrated in graded ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted with neutral gum.
Tumor sections were baked at 60°C for 2 h and then deparaffinized and rehydrated in xylene followed by graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating (100°C) in citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6.0) for 25 min. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Slides were blocked with goat serum for 15 min and then incubated at 4°C with primary antibody, anti-MCL1 (#ab32087, 1:100 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.) overnight. Sequentially, secondary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.) was applied at 4°C for 30–40 min. After washing with PBS, diaminobenzidine (DAB) was added for 10–20 min, followed by washing in water. Slides were counterstained for 30 s with Hematoxylin. At last, the sections were rapidly dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and mounted in neutral gum. The pathological sections were observed under the microscope.
All the protein was extracted from cultured cells or tissues by RIPA (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The concentration of protein was measured by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, U.S.A.). Samples were loaded equally in lanes, resolved using SDS/PAGE (Beyotime, Nantong, China), and transferred on to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blocked at room temperature with 5% BSA for 1 h, and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (anti-MCL1, #ab32087, 1:1000; anti-GAPDH, #ab181603, 1:10000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.). Consecutively, the secondary antibodies (IgG-HRP, #ab7090, 1:2000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.) were added and the protein was incubated for another 1.5 h at low temperature shaker. ECL Plus (Life Technology, Shanghai China) was used for protein visualization, and GAPDH was used for quantity normalization of the protein.
Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay
The synthetic LINC00152 and LINC00152-mut sequences were inserted into the XbaI and FseI restriction sites with the pGL3 plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI). BGC-823 and AGS cells were transfected with pGL3-linc00152-WT or pGL3-linc00152-mut. Meanwhile, Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent (Life Technologies, U.S.A.) was used to co-transfect miR-193a-3p mimics or scrambles (mimics NC) into AGS or BGC-823 cells. The relative luciferase activities were normalized to Renilla luciferase activities by Renilla luciferase vector pRL-SV50 (Promega, Madison, WI). The luciferase activities were assessed at 48 h after transfection, using Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI).
By the same method, MCL1-WT and MCL1-mut sequences were inserted into AGS and BGC-823 cells by the pGL3 plasmid, co-transfected with miR-193a-3p mimics or mimics NC. The luciferase activities were measured at 48 h after transfection.
All the experiments in our study were performed in triplicate and repeated three times at least. One-way ANOVA was used to do multiple-group comparisons. Data were expressed in the format of mean ± S.D., and Student’s ttest was performed to test the differences between two independent groups. All statistical analyses were presented with GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.
LINC00152 was overexpressed in GC tissues
GSE54129, including 111 cancer tissues and 21 normal adjacent tissues, was acquired from the GEO database for microarray-based analysis. According to the microarray analysis, 126 lncRNAs were overexpressed and 82 lncRNAs were lowly expressed in the GC tissues, as shown in the volcano plot (Figure 1A) and the heat map (Figure 1B). Amongst them, LINC00152 expression in GC tissues was markedly increased, compared with adjacent normal tissues (P<0.01, Figure 1C and Supplementary Figure S1A). Besides, in AGS, SGC-7901, BGC-823, and MGC-803 cell lines, LINC00152 was obviously expressed at a higher level than in GES-1 cell line (Figure 1D and Supplementary Figure S1B).
LINC00152 was overexpressed in GC tissues and cell lines
LINC00152 silencing inhibited GC cells proliferation
The knockdown efficiency of si-LINC00152 was evaluated in both AGS and BGC-823 cells (Figure 2A). The colony formation assay demonstrated that colonies were reduced remarkably in the si-LINC00152 group than in the si-NC group (P<0.05), indicating that LINC00152 silencing suppressed GC cells proliferation (Figure 2B), and CCK-8 assay detected cell viability in different time points also showed similar results (Figure 2C). Furthermore, the flow cytometry (FCM) assay was used to examine cell cycle progression, AGS and BGC-823 cells transfected with si-LINC00152 showed a cell cycle arrest at G1/G0 phase (P<0.01, Figure 2D).
LINC00152 regulated GC cells proliferation
Sh-linc00152 suppressed the tumor growth of GC cells
To validate the oncogenic role of LINC00152 in GC tumorigenesis, we constructed a xenograft mouse model. At 6th week after injection of stably transfecting sh-linc00152 or sh-Ctrl AGS cells, we found that knockdown of LINC00152 significantly decreased tumorigenesis. The tumors formed in the sh-linc00152 group of nude mice were notably smaller and lighter than those in the empty vector group (P<0.05, Figure 3A–C). qRT-PCR showed that LINC00152 expression was decreased in the sh-linc00152 tumor tissues, compared with the control group (P<0.05, Figure 3D). Furthermore, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis indicated decreased MCL1 staining, and HE staining analysis reflected a lower rate of tumor proliferation, in tumor tissues with suppressed LINC00152 expression (Figure 3E). In short, our results revealed that sh-linc00152 inhibited the tumor growth of GC cells in vivo.
Sh-linc00152 inhibited tumor growth in the xenograft study
The interaction between LINC00152/
miR-193a-3p and miR-193a-3p/ MCL1
TargetScan prediction output revealed that LINC00152 might contain a binding site for miR-193a-3p (Figure 4A), and miR-193a-3p might contain a binding site for MCL1 (Figure 4C). To verify the above two predictions, pGL3-linc00152-wt (MCL1-wt) and pGL3-linc00152-mut (MCL1-mut) were constructed for dual-luciferase reporter assay. It was indicated that the target binding of linc00152-mut and miR-193a-3p was reduced (P<0.01, Figure 4B), and the target binding of MCL1-mut and miR-193a-3p was also reduced (P<0.01, Figure 4D), which was evidenced by significantly higher luciferase activity in mut groups compared with wt groups. Moreover, the overexpressed LINC00152 increased MCL1 level, while the silenced LINC00152 increased miR-193-3p level. MiR-193-3p could also negatively regulate MCL1 level (P<0.01, Figure 4E). In GC tumor tissues, the MCL1 expression level was positively correlated to linc00152 level (Figure 4F). Taken together, these data suggested that LINC00152 could directly interact with miR-193a-3p, and miR-193a-3p could directly interact with MCL1 in GC cells.
miR-193a-3p or miR-193a-3p/ MCL1 had direct interaction
LINC00152 relieved cells proliferation inhibition induced by
To investigate the influence of miR-193a-3p on GC cells proliferation and the negative regulation effect of LINC00152 on miR-193-3p, we transfected mimics NC, miR-193a-3p mimics, miR-193a-3p inhibitor, miR-193a-3p mimics, and pcDNA3.1-LINC00152 into AGS and BGC-823 cells, respectively. The effectiveness of mimics and inhibitor transfection was confirmed by comparing with the control group. The lower expression of miR-193a-3p in the mix group compared with the mimics group validated that LINC00152 negatively regulated miR-193a-3p (P<0.01, Figure 5A). The colony formation assay revealed that the GC cells proliferation was suppressed after transfection with miR-193a-3p mimics, and the suppression was reversed by LINC00152 (P<0.01, Figure 5B). The CCK-8 assay showed that miR-193a-3p overexpression remarkably reduced cellular viability compared with control groups (P<0.05), while cellular viability of mix group (transfected with miR-193a-3p mimics and linc00152) was increased compared with the mimics group (Figure 5C). Besides, the FCM analysis indicated that miR-193a-3p overexpression significantly promoted the arrest of both cell lines in G1/G0 phase, with an obvious decrease in the number of S-phase cells (P<0.05). LINC00152 in the mix group reversed the cell reproduction arrest induced by miR-129a-3p (Figure 5D).
MiR-193a-3p inhibited GC cells proliferation in vitro
MCL1 promoted GC cells proliferation
Now that we have validated the direct interaction between MCL1 and miR-193a-3p, we further confirmed the effect of MCL1 on GC cells by transfecting NC, MCL1, sh-MCL1 into AGS and BGC-823 cells, respectively. The expression level of MCL1 was measured by both qRT-PCR and Western blot. The results revealed a decrease in MCL1 expression in the sh-MCL1 group, indicating the effectiveness of sh-MCL1 transfection (P<0.05, Figure 6A,B). Overexpressed MCL1 facilitated colony formation while sh-MCL1 inhibited this tendency (P<0.05, Figure 6C). CCK-8 assay showed that MCL1 enhanced viability and restricted apoptosis of GC cells (P<0.05, Figure 6D). Furthermore, the FCM analysis revealed that sh-MCL1 significantly promoted the arrest of both cell lines in G1/G0 phase (P<0.01, Figure 6E). Collectively, the results suggested that MCL1 positively affected GC cells proliferation.
MCL1 promoted GC cells proliferation
MCL1 expression by down-regulating miR-193a-3p
To further investigate that whether MCL1 expression was regulated by LINC00152 through miR-193a-3p, qRT-PCR, and Western blot were conducted to analyze the mRNA and protein expression of MCL1 in linc00152 or miR-193a-3p transfected cells. Amongst the five groups, the expression of MCL1 was lowest in the miR-193a-3p mimics groups, while MCL1 expression was enhanced in linc00152 and miR-193a-3p co-transfected groups compared with the mimics groups (P<0.05). Thus, the inhibition of MCL1 given by miR-193a-3p was again confirmed by comparing the mix group to the LINC00152 group (P<0.01). Besides, cells in both the miR-193a-3p inhibitor group and LINC00152 group showed a higher MCL1 expression than in the control group (Figure 7A). Similar results can be obtained from the Western blot assay, which showed the protein levels of MCL1 in different transfection groups (Figure 7B). Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to examine the association between LINC00152/MCL1 and GC patient prognosis. Moreover, patients expressing increased expression levels of LINC00152/MCL1 had notably shorter survival time than those with low expression of LINC00152/MCL1 (Figure 7C).
MCL1 expression by down-regulating miR-193a-3p
Over the past 30 years, lncRNAs have proved to play an important role in various malignant tumors . Amongst tens of thousands identified lncRNAs, increasing evidence has shown that LINC00152 was an oncogene involved in multiple cancers [15–17], and it was significantly overexpressed in various kinds of human cancer cell lines [18–22]. Studies revealed that silencing LINC00152 had marked effects to inhibit cells proliferation, invasion and migration, and enhance cell apoptosis . Though LINC00152 was confirmed to be involved in cell cycle arrest and proliferation in GC , the detailed molecular mechanism of LINC00152 involved in GC tumor growth still needs further investigation. In the present work, we investigated the LINC00152 expression in GC tissues along with adjacent normal tissues in different cell lines. We finally came to a conclusion that LINC00152 was up-regulated in GC cell lines and tissues.
LINC00152 was identified to be one of the oncogenes that could be potential diagnostic/prognostic markers . In this study, we observed remarkably higher expression level of LINC00152 in four GC cell lines (AGS, BGC-823, SGC-7901, and MGC-803) as well as human normal gastric epithelial cell line GES-1, consistent with the results given by Pang et al. . Besides, we confirmed that knockdown of LINC00152 suppressed GC cells proliferation and the in vivo test verified that silencing LINC00152 decreased tumor size and weight.
Recently, Xia et al.  found that lncRNAs might play a crucial role in GC occurrence and development by interacting with miRNAs and participating in signaling pathways. Researchers have demonstrated that miR-193a-3pserves as a neoplasm suppressor in lung cancer [26,27] and colorectal cancer . Besides, miR-193a-3p was identified as an antiproliferative miRNA inhibiting endothelial colony forming cells (ECFC)-derived cell proliferation . In our study, a direct relationship between LINC00152 and miR-193a-3p was demonstrated. Furthermore, miR-193a-3p notably reduced proliferation and viability of GC cells, which was consistent with the results given by Pekow et al. . That was to say, LINC00152 could relieve cells proliferation inhibition induced by miR-193a-3p.
MCL1 has been proved to be overexpressed in GC tissues compared with normal gastric tissues  and was able to mediate the resistance to apoptosis in GC cells . Previous studies revealed that MCL1 was inversely correlated with the level of some miRNAs such as miR-193b  and miR-125b , and MCL1 expression could induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) via some signaling pathways, which subsequently stimulated the invasive and migratory capacity of human GC cells . In the present study, we verified that MCL1 silencing suppressed GC cells proliferation, and we further demonstrated that miR-193a-3p overexpression inhibited GC tumor growth by directly targetting at MCL1.
So far, we have demonstrated that up-regulation of LINC00152 suppressed miR-193a-3p, contributing to enhancement of MCL1 expression and afterward, promoting proliferation of GC cells. In addition, we performed qRT-PCR and Western blot to further validate this assumption. Finally, we came to a conclusion that LINC00152 overexpression promoted GC cells proliferation by LINC00152/miR-193a-3p/MCL1 pathway. The current study also had some unavoidable limitations; for example we conducted cell experiments mainly in AGS and BGC-823 GC cell lines, while the specific experiment results in other GC cell lines had missed. However, we believed that the tendency would be similar and this could be further investigated in the future. Collectively, our study showed LINC00152 might function as an oncogenic lncRNA to drive cancer development through LINC00152/miR-193a-3p/MCL1 pathway and have great potential to become a promising biomarker and therapeutic target in GC.
In summary, our study first proposed the LINC00152/miR-193a-3p/MCL1 pathway involved in GC tumor development, and indicated the critical role of LINC00152 in GC cell proliferation. Our findings gave a clear understanding of how LINC00152 was involved in the tumor growth of GC cell proliferation, and it could serve as a potential target for therapy hereafter.
Availability of data and materials
Please contact the authors for data requests.
Consent to publish
Consent for publication was obtained from the participants.
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [grant number 2010B060900024 (to Y.H.)].
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University and all participants signed the informed consent.
Y.H. and H.L. were responsible for the research conception and design. F.L., G.O., and N.L. were responsible for data analysis and interpretation. F.L., Y.Y., and X.Y. were responsible for the statistical analysis. Y.H. and H.L. drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised and approved the final manuscript.
cell counting kit-8
Gene Expression Omnibus
long non-coding RNA
Long intergenic non-coding RNA Long intergenic no-coding RNA
myeloid cell leukemia-1
Gene of phospjate and tension homology deleted on chromsome ten
Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Radio Imminoprecipitation Assay
Roswell Park Memorial Istitute-1640
Tumor Node Metastasis
Xanthomonas badirii 1
These authors contributed equally to this work.