Abstract
Resistance to doxorubicin (DOX) is the most common clinical problem in breast cancer therapy, and the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be investigated. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exhibit important regulatory functions in various malignant tumors including breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to find the relationship between miR-222 and DOX resistance. We found that miR-222 was highly expressed in patients’ serum and DOX-resistant cell line MCF-7-R and that miR-222 could promote proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells. Our results also showed that inhibition of miR-222 in MCF-7-R significantly increased Bcl-2 interacting mediator (Bim) expression both in mRNA and protein levels by using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot. MTT and flow cytometry suggested that lower expressed miR-222 enhanced apoptosis and decreased IC50 of MCF-7-R cells. Conversely, in MCF-7 cells transfected with miR-222 mimics, up-regulation of miR-222 was associated with decreased Bim level accompanied by less apoptosis and higher IC50. Moreover, miR-222 inhibitors reversed DOX resistance via miR-222-Bim-caspase pathway. Collectively, these data first elucidated that miR-222 could function as an oncogene and was able to reduce the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to DOX through miR-222-Bim-caspase pathway, which provided a potential target to increase DOX sensitivity in clinical breast cancer treatment.
Introduction
Breast cancer is considered as the most common malignant tumor among women worldwide [1]. Chemotherapy is a crucial option for those patients in late stage. Unfortunately, patients rapidly get drug resistance to chemotherapy, which leads to a high incidence of early relapse [2]. Doxorubicin (DOX) is an extensively used anti-tumor agent in multifarious cancer treatment including breast cancer. However, the cardiotoxicity, low-selectivity, and drug resistance of DOX limited its extended application [3,4]. Therefore, reversing DOX chemoresistance needs more efforts to make.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (typically 19–22 nucleotides) that function generally in regulating their target gene expression at the post-transcriptional level [5]. MiRNAs could function as both oncogenes or tumor suppressors on approach to regulating genes in different cells [6]. Moreover, selective expression of miRNAs in many cancer diseases promoted therapeutic drug resistance in conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, miRNAs are significant for cancer progression, which may serve as alternative targets in treating breast cancer as well as reversing drug resistance [7]. In our previous work, miR-222 has already been reviewed as a promising biomarker for breast cancer development and progression [8]. Through miRNA microarray and experiments in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and DOX-resistant variant, we have found that miR-222 was responsible for DOX-resistance [9]. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear.
In the present study, miR-222 was demonstrated to participate in the growth and migration of breast cancer cells. Up-regulated expression of miR-222 was also found in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, it was evident that miR-222 predicted sensitivity to DOX, considering its up-regulation leading to DOX resistance.
Materials and methods
Sample sources and cell lines
Blood samples from 25 healthy subjects and 25 breast cancer patients from the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were collected and approved by the human protection subjects committee for the present study. MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and DOX-resistant variant (MCF-7-R) were purchased from the Shanghai Gaining Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Thereinto, MCF-7-R was established by adding high concentrations of DOX (Sigma–Aldrich) into MCF-7 cell culture medium, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MCF-7 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin antibiotic mixture, and MCF-7-R cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco BRL) containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin antibiotic mixture. Culture conditions were both 37°C, with 5% carbon dioxide and 95% air.
RNA samples and transfection
Human miR-222 mimics, miR-222 inhibitors, negative control oligonucleotides (NCO), and Bcl-2 interacting mediator (Bim) siRNA were obtained from the BOHAO Co., Ltd (China). The sequences of RNAs: miR-222 mimics, 5′-AGCUACAUCUGGCUACUGGGU-3′; miR-222 inhibitors, 5′-ACCCAGUAGCCAGAUGUAGCU-3′; NCO, 5′-AUCCCAUGGUGGGUUACAUGGUU-3′; and Bim siRNA, 5′-GACCGAGAAGGUAGACAAUUU-3′. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, U.S.A.) was used to transfect RNAs into cells at a final concentration of 50 nM.
Quantitative real-time PCR
The expression levels of miR-222 and Bim were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). TaqMan MicroRNA Detection Kit was purchased from the Thermo Fisher company. Among them, U6 snRNA was used as an internal reference indicator for miR-222 expression in qRT-PCR quantitation, while GAPDH was used as an internal reference index of Bim expression in qRT-PCR quantitation. At last, 2−ΔΔCt method was applied to calculate miR-222 and Bim levels.
Luciferase reporter assay
In order to generate the wild-types, Bim 3′-UTR was cloned into the pMIR-REPORT™ miRNA Expression Reporter Vectors. The mutant-type was created by mutating the seed regions of the miR-222-binding sites (UGAAUGU to UGAUAGU) with the Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Takara, Japan). Double-luciferase reporter assay (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.) was used to study the interaction between miR-222 and Bim. MCF-7-R cells were seeded in 12-well plates with the density of 3 × 105, and 2 ml DMEM containing 10% FBS but without any antibiotics were added. When cells reached 70–80% fusion degree, miR-222 and Bim 3′UTR or Bim 3′UTR mutants would get a co-transfection. Subsequently, luciferase assay was performed according to the following method: (i) cell culture fluid was discarded, 100 microns report lysis buffer was added to each hole, and the chamber was shook for 15 min. (ii) The cells were collected into a 1.5-ml centrifuge tube and repeatedly freeze-thawed in liquid nitrogen for two times; (iii) balanced at 22°C with a water bath for 10 min; (iv) centrifuged at the conditions of 12000×g, 4°C for 2 min; and (v) added 20 μl cell lysate and 100 μl luciferase reaction substrate, mixing it well, and determining the values.
Western blotting analysis
MCF-7 cells in the logarithmic phase were collected and the cellular proteins were extracted. After that, 10% separation adhesive and 4% concentration adhesive were prepared, and SDS/polyacrylamide gel was placed in an electrophoresis tank for sample loading, electrophoresis and protein transfer. Subsequently, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes were cleaned with Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-Tween (TBST) for three times, each time for 10 min. After blocking with 5% skim milk powder in TBST for 2 h, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight followed by secondary antibodies. The antibodies against Bim, caspase-3, caspase-9, and β-actin were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.
Cell viability and proliferation
MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or inhibitors at a final concentration of 50 μM. After 48 h of transfection, fresh medium containing different concentrations of DOX was used to replace the medium. Cell viability was measured. MTT assay was performed to calculate 50% cell death (IC50) of DOX. The 3H thymidine incorporation assay was used to determine cell proliferation during the last 6 h of incubation.
Cell migration in vitro
MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or inhibitors for 48 h. Before seeding, the under-surface of Transwell’s upper chamber was coated overnight with collagen I at 4°C, and then 1 × 105 cells were inoculated in serum-free medium of Transwell’s upper chamber. Then, porous transparent polyethylene terephthalate membrane with 8-micron pore diameter (Corning Costar Corporation, U.S.A.) and hydroxyurea (Sigma–Aldrich) was added to prevent cell proliferation. Approximately 24 h later, the cells on the under-surface of upper unit were fixed, stained, and counted under a phase contrast microscope.
Bioinformatics and statistical analysis
The online miRNA database TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org) was used for prediction of miR-222 target gene. All experiments were carried out at least three times. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Student–Newman–-Keuls post-hoc test was used to assess the statistical significance of difference between cell groups. The comparison of miRNA expression level between serums from healthy subjects and breast cancer patients were performed using Wilcoxon’s unmatched pairs signed rank test. All the data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed for statistical significance using SPSS version 16.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
miR-222 is highly expressed in MCF-7-R cells and patients’ serums
Expressions of miR-222 were analyzed by RT-qPCR in serums from patients and healthy controls. Compared with normal controls, miR-222 was obviously up-regulated in breast cancer patients’ serums (Figure 1A). Besides, data showed a relative higher expression of miR-222 in MCF-7-R breast cancer cells with respect to MCF-7 cells (Figure 1B). Therefore, miR-222 was suggested as a tumor promoter in breast cancer cells and may be associated with DOX resistance in MCF-7.
miR-222 is highly expressed in MCF-7-R cells and patients’ serums
(A) The expression of miR-222 in serums of breast cancer patients and healthy controls. (B) The expression of miR-222 in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R breast cancer cell lines. **P<0.05.
(A) The expression of miR-222 in serums of breast cancer patients and healthy controls. (B) The expression of miR-222 in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R breast cancer cell lines. **P<0.05.
miR-222 promotes proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells
In order to figure out the function of miR-222 in breast cancer progression, we transfected miR-222 mimics or inhibitors to change the level of miR-222 in MCF-7 cells. It was found that miR-222 level was increased sharply to ∼10.22-fold after introducing miR-222 mimics, and miR-222 level was decreased to ∼4.27-fold after introducing miR-222 inhibitors (Figure 2A). Moreover, MCF-7 cells showed clearly enhanced proliferative capacity in miR-222-overexpressing group and significantly weakened proliferative capacity in miR-222-knockdown cells (Figure 2B). Furthermore, the migration of MCF-7 cells was significantly promoted when overexpressing miR-222, and was obviously inhibited when knocking down miR-222 (Figure 2C). These results indicated that miR-222 could promote cell proliferation and migration in breast cancer cells.
miR-222 promotes proliferation and migration of MCF-7 cells
(A) The level of miR-222 was analyzed by PCR after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (B) Cell proliferation was measured using 3H thymidine incorporation assay after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. (C) Migration was analyzed using Transwell assays after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group.
(A) The level of miR-222 was analyzed by PCR after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (B) Cell proliferation was measured using 3H thymidine incorporation assay after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. (C) Migration was analyzed using Transwell assays after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics, inhibitors, and negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group.
miR-222 is connected with DOX resistance of breast cancer cells
To confirm the relationship between miR-222 and DOX sensitivity of breast cancer cells, we used a DOX-resistant cell line model (MCF-7-R) through the way exposing MCF-7 cells to high concentration of DOX (Figure 3A). It was observed that IC50 of DOX was obviously increased in MCF-7 cells transfected with miR-222 mimics and significantly decreased in MCF-7-R cells transfected with miR-222 inhibitors (Figure 3B). Low expression of miR-222 made MCF-7-R sensitive to DOX while high expression of miR-222 made MCF-7 resistant to DOX. We further examined whether DOX sensibility regulated by miR-222 was connected to cell apoptosis. As shown in flow cytometry (Figure 3C), MCF-7-R cells reduced survival and increased apoptosis when treated with miR-222 inhibitors, with respect to anti-miR-NC group. When treated with DOX, MCF-7-R cells with miR-222 inhibitors showed a decreased survival and elevated apoptosis in respect to anti-miR-NC. Therefore, reducing miR-222 level made more MCF-7-R cells apoptosis induced by DOX.
miR-222 is connected with DOX resistance of breast cancer cells
(A) MTT was used to calculate the IC50 of DOX in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R cells. (B) MTT was used to measure the IC50 of DOX after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (C) Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the apoptotic rates after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h.
(A) MTT was used to calculate the IC50 of DOX in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R cells. (B) MTT was used to measure the IC50 of DOX after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (C) Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the apoptotic rates after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h.
miR-222 regulates the level of Bim in MCF-7 cells
To explain why miR-222 is connected to DOX sensitivity of MCF-7, we searched TargetScan database (http://www.targetscan.org/) and discovered that miR-222 may target the Bim gene. The position 4052-4059 of Bim 3′-UTR was complementary (5′…AUGUAGC…3′) to the sequence of miR-222 (Figure 4A). Western blot showed that the level of Bim was obviously lower in MCF-7-R cells than in parental MCF-7 cells (Figure 4B). Therefore, reduced Bim expression might be a potential reason for DOX resistance of MCF-7-R cells. We transfected miR-222 mimics to MCF-7 cells and miR-222 inhibitors to MCF-7-R cells in order to change miR-222 level. As we expected, both Bim mRNA and protein levels were decreased in MCF-7 cells transfected with miR-222-mimics. Meanwhile, Bim mRNA and protein levels were both pronounced increased in MCF-7-R cells transfected with miR-222 inhibitors (Figure 4C). A luciferase reporter vector was then constructed to investigate whether miR-222 directly targeted Bim. The results showed that miR-222 mimics group had a significantly decreased luciferase activity of wild-type in MCF-7 cells with respect to control group. Meanwhile, the relative luciferase activity of wild-type was significantly up-regulated in miR-222 inhibitors group in MCF-7-R cells (Figure 4D). No phenomenon was observed in mutations of Bim. These data indicated that miR-222 negatively regulated Bim expression.
miR-222 regulates the level of Bim
(A) miR-222 targets the Bim gene. (B) The expression of Bim was evaluated by PCR and Western blot in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R cells. **P<0.05 vs. MCF-7 group. (C) The expression of Bim was evaluated by RT-qPCR and Western blot after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (D) Luciferase reporter assays was performed after MCF-7 cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant Bim 3′-UTR-reporter constructed together with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant Bim 3′-UTR-reporter constructed together with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls. **P<0.05 vs. control group.
(A) miR-222 targets the Bim gene. (B) The expression of Bim was evaluated by PCR and Western blot in MCF-7 and MCF-7-R cells. **P<0.05 vs. MCF-7 group. (C) The expression of Bim was evaluated by RT-qPCR and Western blot after MCF-7 cells were transfected with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls. **P<0.05 vs. control group. (D) Luciferase reporter assays was performed after MCF-7 cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant Bim 3′-UTR-reporter constructed together with miR-222 mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with wild-type or mutant Bim 3′-UTR-reporter constructed together with miR-222 inhibitors or negative controls. **P<0.05 vs. control group.
miR-222 inhibitors reverse DOX resistance via miR-222-Bim-caspase pathway
We overexpressed Bim in MCF-7-R cells and down-regulated Bim in MCF-7 cells. MTT assay showed that Bim overexpression reversed DOX resistance of MCF-7-R cells. MCF-7 cells had resistance to DOX while Bim inhibition (Figure 5A). We finally investigated the Bim regulation pathway by using miR-222 inhibitors in MCF-7-R cells. Bim is an important member in pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins [10]. It can induce the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and activate caspase to apoptotic protein in many cells. Western blot showed that down-regulated Bim or miR-222 could activate caspase pathway (Figure 5B). In addition, Bim siRNA significantly inhibited the cell death induced by miR-222 inhibitors with DOX in MCF-7-R cells. It was therefore demonstrated that Bim pathway was able to reverse DOX resistance in MCF-7 cells.
miR-222 inhibitors reverse DOX resistance via miR-222-Bim-caspase pathway
(A) Cell viability was measured by MTT assay after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with Bim mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7 cells were transfected with Bim inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h. (B) Western blot analysis was performed to measure the activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 after MCF-7-R cells were treated with Bim inhibitors, miR-222 inhibitors, with or without the presence of DOX.
(A) Cell viability was measured by MTT assay after MCF-7-R cells were transfected with Bim mimics or negative controls, and after MCF-7 cells were transfected with Bim inhibitors or negative controls for 48 h. (B) Western blot analysis was performed to measure the activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 after MCF-7-R cells were treated with Bim inhibitors, miR-222 inhibitors, with or without the presence of DOX.
Discussion
MiRNAs play an important role in cancer therapeutic response and spontaneous acquired resistance. Development of therapeutic approaches based on miRNAs has made considerable achievements. Here we reported that miR-222 induced acquired resistance to DOX in breast cancer cells. Accumulating evidence suggests that miR-222 may act as an oncogene in various cancer types. For instance, up-regulating miR-222 promoted recurrence and reduced disease-specific survival in bladder cancer [11]. It was reported that high expression of miR-222 induced proliferation, cell cycle distinction, and migration capacity and suppressed apoptosis of prostate cancer cells [12]. Besides, miR-222 was proved to target ARID1A to enhance proliferation and invasion of cervical cancer cells [13]. Furthermore, miR-222 was found to be responsible for resistance of tamoxifen which is widely used for breast cancer treatment [14]. However, the specific functions related to miR-222 remains unknown in breast cancer.
In the present study, we have found that miR-222 was highly expressed in breast cancer patients’ serums and especially in MCF-7-R cells. Moreover, these results were positively associated with cell proliferation and migration in vitro, indicating that miR-222 may be a drug resistance promoter in MCF-7-R. Much efforts have been devoted to demonstrate that targeting diverse miRNAs for therapy may improve the anti-tumor effect of chemotherapeutic drugs. For example, the sensitivity to DOX was significantly elevated after transfecting anti-miR-21 oligonucleotide to glioblastoma cells [15]. Down-regulating miR-26b expression inhibited anti-apoptotic gene expression to enhance the curative potency of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL [16]. miR-193b was proved to induce hepatoma cell apoptosis following cisplatin treatment. In the present study, it was revealed that knockdown of miR-222 significantly made MCF-7-R cells re-sensitive to DOX.
Bim is called Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death, which is known as B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-lymphoma-like 11 (BCL2L11) [17]. Bim acts as a key to regulate the mitochondrial (intrinsic) apoptotic pathway, directly activating the pro-apoptotic effect, and promoting cell apoptosis by binding to all of Bcl-2 family members [18]. Our results showed that transfecting miR-222 inhibitors to up-regulate Bim in chemoresistant cancer cells reversed sensitivity of MCF-7-R cells to DOX. Our studies also confirmed that mitochondrial (intrinsic) apoptosis was under control of the Bim pathway. The up-regulation of Bim mediated by miR-222 inhibitors in MCF-7-R cells significantly promoted DOX to damage mitochondria. Therefore, after caspase-3 was resolved, the biomarker of intrinsic apoptosis caspase-9 was activated.
Conclusions
In summary, the present study lay the foundation that miR-222 is a novel oncogene which promotes the chemoresistance in breast cancer. Our research also indicated that targeting the miR-222-Bim pathway may be a potential therapy for breast cancer in the future.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81702591]; and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [grant number BK20170294].
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Author Contribution
Conceived and designed the experiments: H.D. and W.-x. C. Performed the experiments: H.D. and L.-y.X. Analyzed the data: Q.Q. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: W.-x. C and Q.-w. Z. Wrote the paper: H.D.