Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are life-threatening due to the rupture of aorta. Different vascular cell types are known to be involved in AAA development. However, whether any specific cell cluster plays a critical role during AAA formation is unknown. Angiotensin II (Ang II) infused mouse AAA models are commonly used to study the development and progression of AAA. We here investigate the incidence of AAA at different ages or different doses of Ang II in C57BL/6J mice. There was no AAA formation at a concentration of 1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day at the age of 14 weeks. At the age of 20 weeks and 32 weeks, the incidence of AAA was 18.2% (6/21) and 57.1% (4/7), respectively, with a concentration of 1.44 mg/kg/day. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we found that increased clusters of monocytes and neutrophils, macrophages, T cells, and B cells were the typical changes in AAA. A special cluster transformed from endothelial cells (malignant ECs) was identified, in which genesinvolved in lipid metabolism, including Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, Fabp4, and Pparg, were highly expressed. Mice receiving Ang II treatment without AAA development showed increased fibroblasts, which may prevent the occurrence of AAA. Through cell–cell interaction analysis, we found that the Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis, which functions in inflammatory ligand– receptor binding, may play a role in AAA formation. Our results reveal that specific cell clusters may contribute to the progression or prevention of AAA formation. These findings provide new clues for the pathogenesis and intervention of AAA.

Aortic aneurysm (AA) ranks as the 13th leading cause of death in the United States [1,2]. It has been reported that abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) causes approximately 0.35% of all deaths in the United States, which is mainly in individuals older than 55 years old with the male/female ratio of 1.40 [3]. AAA is usually asymptomatic until a sudden rupture. Due to the challenge of obtaining pathological specimens of human patients, animal models are crucial tools for studying the pathogenesis and progression of diseases. Angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion in mice has become the most frequently used method to induce AAA to study the molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies [4,5]. At the very beginning, it was reported that Ang II can only induce AAA in apoE-/- mice, presumably the presence of hyperlipidemia was required because infusion of Ang II into apoE+/+ mice failed to generate aneurysm [6]. However, later studies have shown that after 6 or 10 days of Ang II infusion into 7- to 12-month-old C57BL/6 J mice at a dose of 2500 ng/kg/minute, aortic hematomas/dissections were observed in 35% (8 of 23) mice [7]. Although Ang II can induce AAA in normolipidemic mice at an older age, the incidence was significantly lower compared with that in apoE-/- mice, which was 50% (8 of 16 mice) at the age of 12 weeks [8].

The incidence of AAA in C57BL/6 J mice treated with Ang II infusion varies widely among different studies [9,10]. Considering the low incidence of AAA in Ang II-treated C57BL/6 J mice, one study pointed out that a combination of Ang II and β-aminopropionitrile monofumarate (BAPN), an inhibitor of lysyl oxidase, can induce both thoracic and AAAs with a high incidence [11]. The loss of elastic fibers is an early event during aneurysm formation. The adventitious tissue, in which collagen and fibroblasts are rich, is responsible for the resistance of aneurysm in the absence of medial elastin [12]. BAPN can break the crosslinks of collagen fibers, leading to a high incidence of aneurysm formation.

The disruption of elastic fibers, degradation of collagen fibers, and destruction of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are hallmarks of AAA pathogenesis. Compelling evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction is an early pathological episode during AAA formation, contributing to inflammation in the degenerating arterial wall [13]. However, the exact function of endothelial cells (ECs) in the development of AAA is largely unknown. Here, by using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), we discovered a distinct cluster of heterogeneous EC subpopulations, referred to as malignant EC, showing elevated expression of genes in lipid metabolism, such as Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, and Fabp4. We also found that ECs, SMCs, and fibroblasts were significantly decreased in the AAA group, whereas immune cells were notably increased. Furthermore, our data suggest that the Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis functions in cell–cell interactions, which may promote inflammatory cell infiltration. These new findings reveal the key features in AAA formation, which are important for intervening AAA.

Mouse AAA induced by Ang II infusion

In this study, C57BL/6J male mice were used. Male mice aged 14, 20, or 32 weeks were selected for pump implantation. All mice were maintained under the specific pathogen-free facility of Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology (IGDB), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). ALZET osmotic mini-pumps (Model 1004, Durect Corporation, U.S.A.) were placed subcutaneously in mice to deliver Ang II at a concentration of 1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day, as described previously [14,15]. Pumps filled with PBS were used as normal controls (NCs) for age-matched littermates of mice. Mice were anesthetized with 2% pentobarbital sodium (45 mg/kg), and pumps were implanted through a small incision in the back of the neck, then the incision was sutured with 5–0 suture thread. All incision sites healed within seven days. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of IGDB, CAS.

Aortic ultrasonography monitoring and measurement of aortic diameters

After 28 days of Ang II infusion, mice were anesthetized with 1% isoflurane. Their thorax and abdomen were depilated and coated with a developer solution. The Vevo 2100 Imaging System (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Canada) was utilized, equipped with a 30 MHz transducer, to conduct ultrasound scans in B-mode. These scans included the longitudinal images of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, abdominal aorta, and measurements of internal diameter of the aorta. The branch of the cephalic trunk and approximately 1 cm above the branch of the coeliac trunk were chosen as the anatomical landmarks for measuring the diameter of aortic arch and abdominal aorta, respectively. AAA could be diagnosed when the ratio of the diameter of the suprarenal aorta and the non-dilated adjacent aorta is ≥1.5 [2].

Immunohistochemical analysis and immunofluorescence staining of aortic tissues

Mice were euthanized following an intraperitoneal injection of excessive 2% pentobarbital sodium after monitoring aortic ultrasonography. The aorta was perfused through the heart with cold PBS, and segments of the aorta from the aortic root to the suprarenal abdominal aorta were isolated, with the surrounding connective tissue stripped off under a stereoscope. Mouse aortic tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The adventitial tissue was carefully removed, and the tissue was placed on a black gel plate for imaging of the aorta. Aortic tissue was embedded in paraffin and then sectioned. Aortic sections (5 μm) were stained with Masson’s trichrome, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and elastic staining reagents, respectively. Images were captured by the Nikon microscope Eclipse H550S (Nikon, Japan).

In order to confirm the cell cluster changes, the first antibodies used for immunofluorescence staining, including mouse anti-osteopontin (OPN, also named as SPP1) antibody (1:200, AF808, R&D system, U.S.A.), rabbit anti-CD68 antibody (1:100, 97778, Cell Signaling Technology, U.S.A.), mouse anti-lipoprotein lipase (LPL) antibody (1:200, ab93898, Abcam, U.K.), rabbit anti-GPIHBP1 antibody (1:20, NB110-41539, Novus Biologicals, U.S.A.), rabbit anti-CXCR4 antibody (1:100, T55380S, ABmart, China), and rabbit anti-ACKR3 antibody (1:100, A12712, ABclonal, China). The sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Then, the sections were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 minutes and incubated with the aforementioned primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 three times, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (A-32731, Invitrogen, U.S.A., 1:2,000) or Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (A-32758, Invitrogen, U.S.A., 1:2,000) or Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (A-21203, Invitrogen, U.S.A., 1:2000 dilution) or Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (A-11012, Invitrogen, U.S.A., 1:2000 dilution) for 60 min at 37°C in the dark. Finally, the sections were mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade reagent containing DAPI (Invitrogen, U.S.A.). Images were captured using the Zeiss LSM 880 Confocal Microscope (Zeiss, Germany).

scRNAseq and data analysis

We conducted scRNAseq on three groups of mice: 20-week-old mice receiving Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day) or PBS infusion. The mice receiving Ang II were further divided into two groups (based on ultrasonography monitoring, with or without AAA). After conducting aortic ultrasonography monitoring, the mice were killed. The aortas were perfused through the heart with cold PBS, and the abdominal aortas were isolated and pooled from four mice in each group for single-cell suspension. The adventitial tissue was carefully removed, and the abdominal aortas were washed three times with cold PBS, then transferred to a 2 ml centrifuge tube containing 500 µl RPMI 1640 (11875093, Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.A.). The tissue was cut with scissors as small as possible. 1 ml RPMI 1640 containing 0.125% trypsin (25200056, Invitrogen, U.S.A.) was added to the tube, which was then placed on ice and gently mixed. The tubes were incubated at 37°C with slow rotation for 30 min. Following this, the tubes were centrifuged at 4°C, 300 g for 5 min, completely discard the supernatant, and 1.5 ml PB (BSA in PBS, final concentration is 0.5%) buffer was added to resuspend the tissue. The supernatant was discarded again as described above. 1.5 ml RPMI 1640 containing 1 mg/ml collagenase II (1148090, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added into the centrifuge tube, and the tubes were rotated slowly at 37°C for 30 min. The samples were filtered with a 70 µM filter. The strainer and 2 ml centrifuge tube were washed with RPMI 1640, respectively, and the final volume was 10 ml. The samples were centrifuged at 4°C, 300 g for 5 min, then completely discarded the supernatant, and the cells were resuspended with 400 µl PB buffer. Acridine Orange (AO)/Propidium Iodide (PI) staining was conducted for quality inspection. After erythrocyte lysis, cell debris was removed.

Analyses were performed using R software (https://www.r-project.org/, version 3.6) and primarily utilizing the ‘Seurat’ packages. To process the data, cells were filtered. A total of 29,435 cells (before-treatment specimens) were retained based on the filtering criteria: 1) the number of genes detected per cell was >300 and <4000 and 2) the percent of mitochondrial genes was <0.10. Then, we selected the expression matrix of cells from pre-treatment samples as the input. Expression profiles were log-normalized and scaled, with the percentage of mitochondrial genes regressed out. Clusters were determined using the first 15 principal components and visualized through the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction method for each sample. The identified cell clusters could be readily assigned to known cell lineages through conventional marker genes. The cell–cell interactions and receptor–ligand pairs between all major cell types were estimated using CellPhoneDB (version 2.1.2) (www.cellphonedb.org). Potential interactions between the two cell types were inferred through gene expression levels using 1000 permutation tests. Then, the resulting adjacency matrices were generated for all cell–cell interactions and visualized on heatmaps. Cell–cell interactions within identical cellular lineages were excluded. Only gene pairs involved in receptor-ligand interactions in cell types of interest were visualized if the combined P value was <0.001 (calculated by multiplying all P values within each gene pair).

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SEM. All statistical tests were two-sided, a significant difference was considered when the P value was <0.05. Comparisons of the aortic diameters were analyzed using the student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA. Comparisons of the AAA incidence rates were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Comparisons of differences in the composition ratios of cell clusters were analyzed using chi-square test. GraphPad Prism 9 was used for statistical analyses. Differential gene expression testing was conducted in Seurat as outlined in the scRNAseq section.

Ang II-induced AAA in mice is age-dependent

To investigate the impact of age and dosage on Ang II-induced AAA, we observed no AAA formation at doses of 1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day in 14-week-old mice. However, a minor suprarenal aortic dilation was noted at the 2.16 mg/kg/day dose compared with the NC group (P<0.05) (Figure 1A–C, Table 1). At the age of 20 weeks and 32 weeks, both at a concentration of 1.44 mg/kg/day, the incidence of AAA was 18.2% (2/11) and 57.1% (4/7) (Figure 1D–G). Although it appears that the incidence increased with age, the difference in the occurrence of aortic dissections between these two age groups was not significant (P>0.05), which may be due to the relatively small number of mice used. To precisely define cell-specific transcriptomic changes associated with Ang II-induced AAA, we performed scRNAseq of isolated abdominal aortic tissues from 20-week-old mice, as illustrated in Figure 1H.

Age and dose effects in Ang II-induced AAA in mice.

Figure 1:
Age and dose effects in Ang II-induced AAA in mice.

(A) Representative ultrasound images from C57BL/6 J mice treated with either PBS or Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day) at the age of 14 weeks. Scale bars: 2 mm. (B) Representative images of the mouse aorta at 14 weeks of age. C57BL/6 J mice were infused with Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day for 28 days). Negative control (NC) mice were C57BL/6 J mice of the same age and gender as the experimental group, infused with PBS for the same duration. Scale bars: 1 cm. (C) There were no significant differences in the lumen diameter of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and abdominal aorta when comparing Ang II-treated mice (1.44 mg/kg/day, n = 4; 2.16 mg/kg/day, n = 9) with the PBS- treated mice (NC, n = 5) at the age of 14 weeks (ANOVA, i>P = 0.1427, 0.7838, and 0.1222). However, the diameters of the suprarenal abdominal aorta were slightly increased in Ang II (2.16 mg/kg/day) infused mice compared with the NC group. *P = 0.0429. The means ± SEM of the lumen diameter can be found in Table 1. N.S. not significant. (D) A representative ultrasound image of AAA from Ang II-treated mice (1.44 mg/kg/day) for 28 days at the age of 20 weeks. Scale bar: 2 mm. The diameter of the dilated suprarenal aorta was 1.596 mm, while the non-dilated adjacent measured 0.70 mm. The ratio of dilated to non-dilated aorta was 2.27, which exceeds the diagnostic criteria of 1.5 for AAA. (E) A representative image of AAA from mice treated with Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day) for 28 days at the age of 20 weeks, as indicated by white arrow. Scale bar: 1 cm. (F) Representative images of AAA sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, top), elastic staining (middle), and Masson’s trichrome (bottom). Scale bars: 1 mm. (G) AAA was detected in 2 out of 11 mice at the age of 20 weeks and in 4 out of 7 mice at the age of 32 weeks. N.S. not significant. (H) A schematic diagram of the experimental design for single-cell RNAseq. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; Ang II, angiotensin II.

Figure 1:
Age and dose effects in Ang II-induced AAA in mice.

(A) Representative ultrasound images from C57BL/6 J mice treated with either PBS or Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day) at the age of 14 weeks. Scale bars: 2 mm. (B) Representative images of the mouse aorta at 14 weeks of age. C57BL/6 J mice were infused with Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day or 2.16 mg/kg/day for 28 days). Negative control (NC) mice were C57BL/6 J mice of the same age and gender as the experimental group, infused with PBS for the same duration. Scale bars: 1 cm. (C) There were no significant differences in the lumen diameter of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and abdominal aorta when comparing Ang II-treated mice (1.44 mg/kg/day, n = 4; 2.16 mg/kg/day, n = 9) with the PBS- treated mice (NC, n = 5) at the age of 14 weeks (ANOVA, i>P = 0.1427, 0.7838, and 0.1222). However, the diameters of the suprarenal abdominal aorta were slightly increased in Ang II (2.16 mg/kg/day) infused mice compared with the NC group. *P = 0.0429. The means ± SEM of the lumen diameter can be found in Table 1. N.S. not significant. (D) A representative ultrasound image of AAA from Ang II-treated mice (1.44 mg/kg/day) for 28 days at the age of 20 weeks. Scale bar: 2 mm. The diameter of the dilated suprarenal aorta was 1.596 mm, while the non-dilated adjacent measured 0.70 mm. The ratio of dilated to non-dilated aorta was 2.27, which exceeds the diagnostic criteria of 1.5 for AAA. (E) A representative image of AAA from mice treated with Ang II (1.44 mg/kg/day) for 28 days at the age of 20 weeks, as indicated by white arrow. Scale bar: 1 cm. (F) Representative images of AAA sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E, top), elastic staining (middle), and Masson’s trichrome (bottom). Scale bars: 1 mm. (G) AAA was detected in 2 out of 11 mice at the age of 20 weeks and in 4 out of 7 mice at the age of 32 weeks. N.S. not significant. (H) A schematic diagram of the experimental design for single-cell RNAseq. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; Ang II, angiotensin II.

Close modal
Table 1
The lumen diameter of ascending aorta, aortic arch and abdominal aorta which were expressed as means ± SEM.
Diameter (mm)Negative Control
(PBS infusion, n = 5)
Ang II Infusion
(1.44 mg/kg/day, n = 4)
Ang II Infusion
(2.16 mg/kg/day, n = 9)
Ascending aorta 1.533 ± 0.04750 1.525 ± 0.02466 1.675 ± 0.06142 
Aortic arch 1.606 ± 0.08163 1.676 ± 0.04532 1.630 ± 0.05024 
Abdominal aorta 0.8892 ± 0.04288 1.010 ± 0.09360 1.097 ± 0.06319 
Diameter (mm)Negative Control
(PBS infusion, n = 5)
Ang II Infusion
(1.44 mg/kg/day, n = 4)
Ang II Infusion
(2.16 mg/kg/day, n = 9)
Ascending aorta 1.533 ± 0.04750 1.525 ± 0.02466 1.675 ± 0.06142 
Aortic arch 1.606 ± 0.08163 1.676 ± 0.04532 1.630 ± 0.05024 
Abdominal aorta 0.8892 ± 0.04288 1.010 ± 0.09360 1.097 ± 0.06319 

Abdominal aortic tissue scRNAseq identifies aneurysm-associated cell clusters

After alignment and quality control, 8,716, 8,443, and 12,276 cells from three groups of abdominal aortas of NC, without AAA (no-AAA) and with AAA (AAA), respectively, were combined and subjected to further analysis. Unsupervised clustering using the Seurat R package revealed 26 distinct clusters, representing 12 cell lineages, including all major aortic cell types (Figure 2A–C, Table 2). In accordance with the canonical markers [16], the major clusters were ECs [Cluster 2, 9, 16, 19, 23, 24; Cdh5+ (encoding a calcium-dependent glycoproteins)], SMCs [Cluster 5, 10, 13, 18, 20; Tagln+ (encoding an SMC-specific cytoskeletal protein)], fibroblasts [Cluster 0, 1, 7, 11, 12; Dcn+ (encoding a protein that regulates collagen fibril assembly)], and immune cells [Cluster 3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22, 25; Ptprc+ (encoding Cd45)] (Figure 2D).

Cell types classified through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of mouse aortas.

Figure 2:
Cell types classified through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of mouse aortas.

(A) After quality control, 8,716, 8,443, and 12,276 cells from the normal control (NC), without AAA formation (no-AAA), and with AAA formation (AAA) groups were selected for clustering analysis, respectively. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of aggregating cells from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. (B) UMAP plot of cell clusters, illustrating the partition of 26 distinct clusters (upper panel) and cell identities (lower panel). The clusters listed in brackets are assigned to different cell types: endothelium (2, 9, 19, 24), endothelium_EMT (23), malignant (16), muscle (5, 10, 13, 18, 20), fibroblast (0, 7), fibroblast_Ccn5 (1), fibroblast_Cd34 (12), fibroblast_Il6 (11), monocyte_neutrophil (mono_neu; 3, 22), macrophage (6), B cell (8, 17, 21), T cell (4, 14, 15, 25). (C) Heat map displaying the top five genes with specific expression for each cell cluster, illustrating the relative expression levels in each cluster. The top five cluster-specific markers for each cluster were selected from all markers of each cluster based on the average log-fold change. Rows represent genes, and columns represent clusters. The width of each cluster represents its proportion in all cells of the three groups. A complete list of marker genes for each cluster can be found in Table 2. (D) The expression of marker genes for cell identification is displayed on the UMAP plot (gene expression log-normalized by Seurat). Cdh5 is the marker of endothelium cells, Tagln is the marker of smooth muscle cells, Dcn is the marker of fibroblasts, Ptprc is the marker of immune cells. (E) The proportions of each identified cell type in the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups are shown in the stacked column chart. The differences of each cell type among the three groups are statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. In Figures 2&#x2013;7, the cluster of muscle represents smooth muscle cells, mono_neu represents monocytes and neutrophils.

Figure 2:
Cell types classified through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of mouse aortas.

(A) After quality control, 8,716, 8,443, and 12,276 cells from the normal control (NC), without AAA formation (no-AAA), and with AAA formation (AAA) groups were selected for clustering analysis, respectively. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of aggregating cells from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. (B) UMAP plot of cell clusters, illustrating the partition of 26 distinct clusters (upper panel) and cell identities (lower panel). The clusters listed in brackets are assigned to different cell types: endothelium (2, 9, 19, 24), endothelium_EMT (23), malignant (16), muscle (5, 10, 13, 18, 20), fibroblast (0, 7), fibroblast_Ccn5 (1), fibroblast_Cd34 (12), fibroblast_Il6 (11), monocyte_neutrophil (mono_neu; 3, 22), macrophage (6), B cell (8, 17, 21), T cell (4, 14, 15, 25). (C) Heat map displaying the top five genes with specific expression for each cell cluster, illustrating the relative expression levels in each cluster. The top five cluster-specific markers for each cluster were selected from all markers of each cluster based on the average log-fold change. Rows represent genes, and columns represent clusters. The width of each cluster represents its proportion in all cells of the three groups. A complete list of marker genes for each cluster can be found in Table 2. (D) The expression of marker genes for cell identification is displayed on the UMAP plot (gene expression log-normalized by Seurat). Cdh5 is the marker of endothelium cells, Tagln is the marker of smooth muscle cells, Dcn is the marker of fibroblasts, Ptprc is the marker of immune cells. (E) The proportions of each identified cell type in the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups are shown in the stacked column chart. The differences of each cell type among the three groups are statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. In Figures 2&#x2013;7, the cluster of muscle represents smooth muscle cells, mono_neu represents monocytes and neutrophils.

Close modal
Table 2
A complete list of marker genes of 12 clusters.
EndotheliumEndothelium_EMT
Cytl1 Pecam1 Clu Ptprb Cldn5 Lrg1 Ctla2a Aqp1 Plvap Selp 
Malignant Muscle 
Fabp4 Cd36 Gpihbp1 Flt1 Mgll Acta2 Tagln Myl9 Tpm2 Myh11 
Fibroblast Fibroblast_ Il6 
Inmt Dpep1 Serpinf1 Serping1 Cygb Il6 Ptgs2 Gpr39 Ccl2 Igfbp5 
Fibroblast_Cd34 Fibroblast_Ccn5 
Pi16 Clec3b Igfbp6 C3 Tnfaip6 Col1a1 Col3a1 Sfrp2 Mfap4 Col1a2 
Macrophage Monocyte_Neutrophil 
Lyz2 Ccl4 Pf4 C1qb C1qa S100a9 S100a8 Il1b Slc7a11  
B cell T cell 
Bank1 Cd74 Cd79a H2-Aa H2-Eb1 Itk Skap1 Grap2 Arhgap15 Lef1 
EndotheliumEndothelium_EMT
Cytl1 Pecam1 Clu Ptprb Cldn5 Lrg1 Ctla2a Aqp1 Plvap Selp 
Malignant Muscle 
Fabp4 Cd36 Gpihbp1 Flt1 Mgll Acta2 Tagln Myl9 Tpm2 Myh11 
Fibroblast Fibroblast_ Il6 
Inmt Dpep1 Serpinf1 Serping1 Cygb Il6 Ptgs2 Gpr39 Ccl2 Igfbp5 
Fibroblast_Cd34 Fibroblast_Ccn5 
Pi16 Clec3b Igfbp6 C3 Tnfaip6 Col1a1 Col3a1 Sfrp2 Mfap4 Col1a2 
Macrophage Monocyte_Neutrophil 
Lyz2 Ccl4 Pf4 C1qb C1qa S100a9 S100a8 Il1b Slc7a11  
B cell T cell 
Bank1 Cd74 Cd79a H2-Aa H2-Eb1 Itk Skap1 Grap2 Arhgap15 Lef1 

In the AAA tissues, the proportions of three major aortic cell types, including SMCs, fibroblasts, ECs were significantly reduced. This reduction may explain why the thickness of the aortic aneurysm wall decreased and its mechanical function was compromised. Consistent with previous findings indicating that inflammation is a fundamental element in the development of AAA [17], we observed a significant increase in immune cells such as monocytes_ neutrophils, macrophages, and T and B lymphocytes in the AAA group. Notably, T and B lymphocytes were the predominant cell populations in AAA tissues (29.9% and 22.6%, respectively). These finding suggest that inflammation in the vasculature is a hallmark of AAA. The differences in composition ratios among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.0001) (Figure 2E).

Both IL-1β and TNF-α have been associated with the progressive inflammatory process that promotes aneurysm progression [18,19]. These two factors have long been considered among the most important factors promoting the inflammatory process in diseases. In our study, the expression of Il1b and Tnf was up-regulated significantly in the clusters of macrophages and mono_neu, which may promote the inflammatory process (Supplementary Figure S1A and B). IL-6 is produced by multiple cell types and mediates a diverse set of pathophysiologic functions. In our study, the expression of Il6 was relatively high in vascular cells including four fibroblast clusters, endothelium, and muscle (Supplementary Figure S1C). Il6 is higher in no-AAA group than in NC group, which may indicate that IL-6, as an important cytokine, was involved in the formation of AAA.

Compared with NC, the proportions of ECs and SMCs decreased slightly in the no-AAA group, while the proportion of immune cells slightly increased. In contrast, we found that the proportion of fibroblasts increased significantly in the no-AAA group, accounting for almost half of the total cells (17.6% in NC, 53.9% in no-AAA, 14.1% in AAA, P<0.0001). Taken together, the decreased number of three major aortic cell types and the expansion of immune cells may represent typical features in AAA.

Distributional pattern of EC subpopulations differentiates the AAA group

Endothelial dysfunction plays a crucial role in the cellular transformation and inflammation of the media and adventitia [20]. In our study, ECs were classified based on cellular markers [21,22] into three groups: malignant (cluster 16, with markers Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, and Fabp4), endothelium_EMT (epithelial–mesenchymal transition) (cluster 23, with markers Lrg1, Ctla2a, Aqp1, Plvap, and Selp), and endothelium (clusters 2, 9, 19 and 24, with markers Cytl1, Pecam1, Clu, Ptprb, and Cldn5). We found that the proportion of ECs significantly decreased in the AAA group, but there was no significant decrease in the no-AAA group (25.64% in NC, 22.18% in no-AAA, and 9.92% in AAA). The cluster of malignant cells mainly presented in AAA tissues (5% of all cells) and no-AAA tissues (4.22% of all cells), while occurring at a low frequency in NC tissues (0.56% of all cells). The proportion of malignant ECs increased significantly (2.17% in NC, 19.04% in no-AAA, 50.41% in AAA), while the proportion of endothelium ECs decreased significantly (96.40% in NC, 74.08% in no-AAA, and 39.41% in AAA). The differences in composition ratio of these three clusters among the three groups were statistically significant (Figure 3A). The EC marker Cdh5 was expressed in the clusters of endothelium, endothelium_EMT, and malignant. Our results suggest that the distributional pattern of EC subpopulations in the three groups differs, allowing for differentiation between the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups (Figure 3B).

Comparison of endothelial cell subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups.

Figure 3:
Comparison of endothelial cell subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups.

(A) Stacked column chart shows the proportion of endothelial cell subtypes in the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. The proportion of endothelial cell subtypes among the three groups was statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. In the NC group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 2.2%, 1.4%, and 96.4%, respectively. In the no-AAA group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 19.0%, 6.9%, and 74.1%, respectively. In the AAA group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 50.4%, 10.2%, and 39.4%, respectively. (B) The expression of Cdh5 in 12 clusters of cells from NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized by feature plots, where three subtypes of epithelial cells can be differentiated. (C) The expression of selected marker genes Cd36, Fabp4, Lpl, Gpihbp1 for the malignant cluster from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized through feature plots. (D) A dual-plot gene expression heatmap shows the highest co-expression of Lpl and Gpihbp1 in the malignant cluster. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of aorta sections stained with anti-Lpl (red) and anti-Gpihbp1 (green). White arrows indicate the co-expression of Lpl and Gpihbp1. Scale bars, 200 μm. The asterisk symbols indicate the location within the lumen of the abdominal aorta. (F) Bar chart of enrichment ratios for Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, upper panel) and Gene Ontology (GO, lower panel) pathways in the malignant cluster of 1601 diferentially expressed genes (including 1168 up-regulated genes and 433 down-regulated genes). False discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.05 indicates significantly enriched pathways, as indicated by the dark blue color. Enrichment ratio = the number of observed genes/ the number of expected genes from each GO or KEGG category in the gene list. (G) The expression of Pparg in the 12 clusters from the NC, no-AAA and AAA groups is visualized by feature plots. Note that Pparg is highly expressed in malignant. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; NC, negative control.

Figure 3:
Comparison of endothelial cell subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups.

(A) Stacked column chart shows the proportion of endothelial cell subtypes in the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. The proportion of endothelial cell subtypes among the three groups was statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. In the NC group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 2.2%, 1.4%, and 96.4%, respectively. In the no-AAA group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 19.0%, 6.9%, and 74.1%, respectively. In the AAA group, the proportions of malignant, endothelium_EMT, and endothelium were 50.4%, 10.2%, and 39.4%, respectively. (B) The expression of Cdh5 in 12 clusters of cells from NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized by feature plots, where three subtypes of epithelial cells can be differentiated. (C) The expression of selected marker genes Cd36, Fabp4, Lpl, Gpihbp1 for the malignant cluster from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized through feature plots. (D) A dual-plot gene expression heatmap shows the highest co-expression of Lpl and Gpihbp1 in the malignant cluster. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of aorta sections stained with anti-Lpl (red) and anti-Gpihbp1 (green). White arrows indicate the co-expression of Lpl and Gpihbp1. Scale bars, 200 μm. The asterisk symbols indicate the location within the lumen of the abdominal aorta. (F) Bar chart of enrichment ratios for Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, upper panel) and Gene Ontology (GO, lower panel) pathways in the malignant cluster of 1601 diferentially expressed genes (including 1168 up-regulated genes and 433 down-regulated genes). False discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.05 indicates significantly enriched pathways, as indicated by the dark blue color. Enrichment ratio = the number of observed genes/ the number of expected genes from each GO or KEGG category in the gene list. (G) The expression of Pparg in the 12 clusters from the NC, no-AAA and AAA groups is visualized by feature plots. Note that Pparg is highly expressed in malignant. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; NC, negative control.

Close modal

We identified that Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, and Fabp4 were markers of the malignant cluster (Figure 3C). Cd36 is extensively expressed on the surface of ECs throughout the aorta [23], where it functions as a transporter of fatty acids (FAs) [24]. EC-specific Cd36 knockout mice showed diminished transfer of long-chain FAs across ECs [25]. Fabp4 is a canonical PPARγ target gene involved in FA transport. Cd36 and Fabp4 are specialized transporters that facilitate the exogenous uptake of FAs from the surrounding microenvironment [26]. Our results showed the highest co-expression of Lpl and Gpihbp1 (Figure 3D and E), confirming that the cells expressing Lpl and its partner Gpihbp1 transport FA to the capillary lumen [27].

The 1601 differentially expressed genes (including 1168 up-regulated genes and 433 down-regulated genes) in the malignant cluster were used for functional annotation. By conducting Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, it was found that functions related to angiogenesis and blood vessel morphogenesis were up-regulated in the cluster of malignant (Figure 3F). In addition, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed enrichment in the pathways of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling, relaxin signaling, and ECM-receptor interaction (adjusted P value <0.05 for all pathways) (Figure 3F). Pparg (which encodes PPARγ), a gene that regulates glucose and lipid metabolism, endothelial function, and inflammation, was highly expressed in the cluster of malignant (Figure 3G). Loss of PPARγ function in the vascular endothelium enhances atherosclerosis in high-fat diet-fed apoE-/- mice [28]. Aortic inflammation during AAA formation is dynamic. Protective anti-inflammatory cytokines are up-regulated in the early compensatory stage. However, pro-inflammatory cytokines are dominant in the late decompensatory stage. PPARγ is likely to continue to up-regulate the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, extend the compensatory stage, and decelerate the process of AAA development and rupture [29]. By using the Ang II-induced murine model of aortic aneurysm, Jones et al. found that treatment with PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone had ameliorative effects on aneurysm development and rupture, which exerted a protective effect on aneurysm development and rupture [30]. PPARγ is also important in lipid metabolism as it regulates genes involved in the release, transport, and storage of FAs, including Lpl and the FA transporter Cd36 [31]. In ECs, FAs transport is facilitated by PPARγ, which stimulates the expression of Cd36 and Fabp4 [32]. In mice which lack PPARγ in the endothelium, the Cd36 and Fabp4 expression levels were decreased significantly in the endothelium, serum-free fatty acid and triglyceride (TG) levels were increased [32].

Ang II can induce AAA in normolipidemic mice at an older age, although the incidence was significantly lower compared with that in apoE-/- mice. The development of AAA is age-dependent, and aging is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease [33]. By single-cell transcriptomic analysis, Zhang et al. compared aortas and coronary arteries in young and old monkeys. They found differentially expressed genes between young and old monkeys, and the core pathways annotated for these genes are involved in ‘response to lipids’ [34]. Therefore, we speculated that advancing age accompanied with abnormal lipid metabolism may contribute to the development of AAA. The cluster of malignant EC appeared after Ang II infusion, in which Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, Fabp4, and Pparg were highly expressed. Thus, in the cluster of malignant, we speculated that the high expression of Cd36, Lpl, Gpihbp1, Fabp4, and Pparg was important in the metabolism of FAs and may contribute to endothelial dysfunction.

Monocyte recruitment and macrophage accumulation play an important role in aneurysm formation

Monocytes and macrophages play a crucial role in aneurysm formation by influencing the migration of leukocytes from the circulating bloodstream to the arterial subendothelial space. We found that the proportion of the mono_neu cluster (representing monocytes and neutrophils) significantly increased in the AAA group (17.24%) compared with 1.05% and 0.87% in the NC group and no-AAA group, respectively. Compared with monocytes, there was no significant difference in the proportion of macrophages between AAA and no-AAA, which were 6.76% and 5.60%, respectively. It has been reported that Spp1-deficient leukocytes provide substantial protection against Ang II-accelerated atherosclerosis and AAA formation [35]. In our study, compared with macrophages in NC and no-AAA, we identified a subpopulation of macrophages in AAA that exhibited significantly up-regulated expression of Spp1 and notably down-regulated expression of Ccl4 and Cxcl10 (Figure 4A). This indicates that these cells may have a crucial role in AAA pathogenesis. In order to validate the existence and localization of Spp1, our results showed that Spp1 was present in the AAA tissues and colocalized with Cd68 through co-immunofluorescence staining. In contrast, Spp1 was not observed in the NC and no-AAA groups (Figure 4B).

Comparison of macrophages in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

Figure 4:
Comparison of macrophages in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

(A) The expression of selected marker genes Ccl4, Cxcl10, Spp1 for the macrophage cluster from NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized through feature plots. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of aorta sections stained with anti-Spp1 (red) and anti-Cd68 (green). White arrows indicate the co-expression of Spp1 and Cd68. Scale bar, 200 μm. The asterisk symbols indicate the location within the lumen of the abdominal aorta. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; NC, negative control.

Figure 4:
Comparison of macrophages in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

(A) The expression of selected marker genes Ccl4, Cxcl10, Spp1 for the macrophage cluster from NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups is visualized through feature plots. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of aorta sections stained with anti-Spp1 (red) and anti-Cd68 (green). White arrows indicate the co-expression of Spp1 and Cd68. Scale bar, 200 μm. The asterisk symbols indicate the location within the lumen of the abdominal aorta. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; NC, negative control.

Close modal

Fibroblast expansion may prevent the development of aneurysm upon Ang II treatment

We next explored why about two thirds of mice receiving Ang II infusion did not develop AAA. Fibroblasts were identified as the largest cell population in no-AAA tissues. These fibroblasts have been differentiated into four major subpopulations: fibroblast, fibroblast_Il6, fibroblast_Ccn5, and fibroblast_Cd34 [36,37]. Il-6 is a member of the interleukin family. Camk2d (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II) is known to play an important role during cardiac hypertrophy [38]. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) is a member of the STAT protein family, which acts as a transcription activator, and response to cytokines and growth factors. Il-6 can directly activate Camk2d, the latter then activate Stat3 [39]. The Il6–Camk2d–Stat3 pathway is involved in fibroblast activation, leading to cardiac fibrosis [40]. In the cluster of Il6+ fibroblasts, the expression of Camk2d and Stat3 was up-regulated (Figure 5A), suggesting that this cluster may promote vascular fibrosis.

Comparison of fibroblast subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

Figure 5:
Comparison of fibroblast subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

(A) Stacked column chart depicting the proportion of fibroblast subtypes in NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. The proportions of fibroblast subtypes in the three groups listed are statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. (B) The expression of Camk2d and Stat3 was up-regulated in the cluster of fibroblast_Il6. The color key from gray-violet to blue indicates low to high expression levels. The dot size indicates the percentage of cells expressing the two indicated genes. (C) The expression of elastin (Eln) in different cell clusters. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; NC, negative control.

Figure 5:
Comparison of fibroblast subpopulations in the abdominal aorta among the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group.

(A) Stacked column chart depicting the proportion of fibroblast subtypes in NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups. The proportions of fibroblast subtypes in the three groups listed are statistically significant, ****P<0.0001 by Chi-square test. (B) The expression of Camk2d and Stat3 was up-regulated in the cluster of fibroblast_Il6. The color key from gray-violet to blue indicates low to high expression levels. The dot size indicates the percentage of cells expressing the two indicated genes. (C) The expression of elastin (Eln) in different cell clusters. AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; NC, negative control.

Close modal

Cd34 is one of the markers for myofibroblast (MF). MFs are specialized cells that originate in pathophysiological conditions and contribute to tissue repair during wound healing [41]. Cellular communication network 5 (Ccn5), which is known as a secreted protein, mediates anti-fibrotic activity by inhibiting fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition [42,43]. In consideration of the increased proportions of both Cd34+ fibroblasts and Ccn5+ fibroblasts in no-AAA compared with NC, we speculate that under the stimulation of Ang II, Cd34+ fibroblasts proliferated, which may contribute to tissue repair. Additionally, Ccn5+ fibroblasts increased to balance the increase of Cd34+ fibroblasts due to their anti-fibrotic activity [42,43]. Our data showed that although the total number of fibroblasts differed significantly between no-AAA and AAA tissues (52.21% vs 10.04%, P<0.0001), the changes in fibroblast proportions exhibited a similar trend in these two groups when compared with NC. The cell proportions of fibroblast and fibroblast_Il6 were lower in no-AAA and AAA tissues compared with the NC group, while the cell proportions of fibroblast_Cd34 and fibroblast_Ccn5 were higher in no-AAA and AAA tissues compared with NC (Figure 5B). The differences in composition ratios of these four clusters among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.0001). Thus, changes in fibroblast subtypes may be associated with AAA development.

The loss of elastic fibers is an early event during aneurysm formation. The adventitious tissue, in which collagen and fibroblasts are rich, is responsible for the resistance of aneurysm in the absence of medial elastin [12]. In our study, the expression of Eln was high in the cluster of endothelium, fibroblast and fibroblast_Ccn5, and muscle, and the proportions of these clusters were reduced significantly in the AAA group (Figure 5C).

The Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis may function in AAA development

To visualize the intercellular communication network, Figure 6 illustrates the number and strength of interactions between 12 cell clusters. All four types of fibroblast clusters are strongly associated with mono_neu and macrophages. Additionally, fibroblast_Ccn5 is strongly linked to the muscle cluster, and fibroblast_Cd34 is strongly connected to the endothelium_EMT cluster. By analyzing cell communication with CellphoneDB, we identified specific ligand–receptor interaction pairs, such as Cxcl12–Cxcr4 and Cxcl12–Ackr3, which consistently occurred between different clusters (Figure 7A). Cxcr4 expression was significantly increased in the cluster of immune cells, including macrophages, monocytes, and T and B lymphocytes, while Ackr3 expression was significantly increased in the cluster of non-immune cells (Figure 7B). By immunostaining, we confirmed the increased expression of Cxcr4 mostly in the aneurysm of the AAA group (Supplementary Figure S2A) and increased expression of Ackr3 mostly in the vascular wall and adventitia of the AAA group (Supplementary Figure S2B).

Visualization and analysis of cell–cell communication through circle plots.

Figure 6:
Visualization and analysis of cell–cell communication through circle plots.

The number and strength of interactions between pairs of 12 cell clusters are shown. The sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of cells in each cluster; the larger the circle, the greater the number of cells. The width of the edges represents the communication probability; the thicker the line, the more likelihood of communication.

Figure 6:
Visualization and analysis of cell–cell communication through circle plots.

The number and strength of interactions between pairs of 12 cell clusters are shown. The sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of cells in each cluster; the larger the circle, the greater the number of cells. The width of the edges represents the communication probability; the thicker the line, the more likelihood of communication.

Close modal

Dot plot illustrating selected ligand–receptor interactions in various cell subsets.

Figure 7:
Dot plot illustrating selected ligand–receptor interactions in various cell subsets.

(A) Ligand and receptor pairs are displayed on the x-axis, while the cell subsets are presented on the y-axis. The color of the dot indicates the signaling probability scores of the receptor–ligand pairs showing a significant interaction among these communicating cell subsets. The P values were generated by CellphoneDB, which utilizes a one-sided permutation test to calculate significant interactions. The dots displayed represent interactions with a P value <0.01. The communication probability (Commun.Prob) is displayed in the color key. (B) The expression distribution of signaling genes Cxcl12, Ackr3, and Cxcr4, which are involved in the inferred signaling network from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups, is visualized through feature plots.

Figure 7:
Dot plot illustrating selected ligand–receptor interactions in various cell subsets.

(A) Ligand and receptor pairs are displayed on the x-axis, while the cell subsets are presented on the y-axis. The color of the dot indicates the signaling probability scores of the receptor–ligand pairs showing a significant interaction among these communicating cell subsets. The P values were generated by CellphoneDB, which utilizes a one-sided permutation test to calculate significant interactions. The dots displayed represent interactions with a P value <0.01. The communication probability (Commun.Prob) is displayed in the color key. (B) The expression distribution of signaling genes Cxcl12, Ackr3, and Cxcr4, which are involved in the inferred signaling network from the NC, no-AAA, and AAA groups, is visualized through feature plots.

Close modal

As a highly conserved seven transmembrane regions protein, Cxcl12 is the only ligand for Cxcr4, which induces the activation of PI3K–Akt signaling pathway and regulates the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 to activate NF–κB and mTOR signaling pathways, thereby regulating cell growth and proliferation [44]. Cxcr4 plays a role in leukocyte chemotaxis during inflammatory conditions in various autoimmune diseases, and elevated levels of Cxcr4 have been observed in various types of human cancers [45]. In our study, we found ubiquitous expression of Cxcr4 in macrophages, monocytes, and T and B lymphocytes, which might be recruited by Cxcl12 signaling and promote the progression of inflammation, which play a progressive role in the AAA group. Meanwhile, Ackr3 has 10 times more binding affinity for Cxcl12 than the classical receptor Cxcr4. The primary role of Ackr3 is to internalize and deliver its ligand Cxcl12 for lysosomal degradation, thus negatively regulating the Cxcl12-Cxcr4 signaling cascade [46]. The Cxcl12–Ackr3 activates MAPK/ERK signaling pathway to regulate cell survival, migration and differentiation [47]. The cell–cell interaction via Cxcl12–Ackr3 was identified between all clusters of endothelium and fibroblasts by the CellPhone database, which may play a protective role in AAA formation. The differentially distributional expression of Cxcr4 and Ackr3 as shown in Supplementary Figure S2 may imply their antergic roles in different cell types during AAA formation. For example, the higher expression of Cxcr4 and lower expression of Ackr3 in the aneurysm may contribute to the progression of AAA. Thus, the Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis may play pivotal roles in the initiation, development, and progression of aneurysm.

In this study, we investigated the incidence of AAA in normolipidemic C57BL/6 J mice at different ages. We found that at the age of 20 weeks and 32 weeks with an Ang II concentration of 1.44 mg/kg/day, the incidence of AAA reached 18.2% and 57.1%, respectively. This suggests that the development of AAA is age-dependent. We also found that the diameters of the suprarenal aortic lumen slightly increased with a dose effect of Ang II at the age of 14 weeks. Compared with the apoE-/- mice, the incidence of AAA in the normolipidemic mice is relatively lower. Therefore, the C57BL/6 J mouse model would be more appropriate for testing induction factors rather than protection factors. As advancing age is a risk factor for AAA development in humans [48], which affecting up to 9% of adults older than 65 years of age [49], the incidence of Ang II-induced AAA in mice increased with age, as demonstrated in this study. Therefore, aged C57BL/6 J mice with AAA are better to mimic human AAA.

In human, the most accessible AAA tissue is from advanced lesions that have been dissected during open surgical repair, which cannot provide sufficient evidence of the molecular events at earlier stages. We investigated the cellular landscape of the no-AAA group to mimic the earlier stages of AAA. We found that fibroblasts were the most abundant cell type in the no-AAA tissues. We speculated that the expansion of fibroblasts may be a compensatory reaction to protect the mice from the development of aneurysm. It has been reported that the protective effect may be achieved through modulating extracellular matrix production, thereby enhancing aortic stability [50]. Hong et al. also reported that enhancing collagen synthesis, which increases aortic stiffness, can be a promising approach for treating AAA [51], but further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and side-effects. The reduction in fibroblasts may be related to the formation of AAA. In addition, C57BL/6 J mice are widely used in studying AAA. We have depicted the difference between the no-AAA and AAA groups induced by Ang II. The cellular landscape can be used to assess the impact of genes or chemicals on alleviating or exacerbating the AAA condition in this mouse models.

The two types of vascular diseases, atherosclerosis and AAA, are strongly interrelated and associated [52]. Although these two diseases develop through different pathogenic mechanisms, they are both closely associated with endothelial dysfunction [20]. The earliest changes that eventually result in the formation of atherosclerotic lesions occur in the endothelium [53]. Endothelium can first sense excessive hemodynamic stimulation, then release and activate various vasoactive substances, disrupt the dynamic balance between proliferation and apoptosis of various cells including ECs, SMCs and fibroblasts, and ultimately alter the morphology, structure, and function of blood vessels. In our study, we identified a unique cluster of malignant arisen after Ang II infusion, and these cells are implicated in lipid uptake. Consistent with previous studies, our results suggest that dyslipidemia and disordered lipid metabolism may be a significant risk factor for AAA development.

The Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis is involved in both proatherogenic and atherogenesis-protective functions in various cell types [46]. We found that this axis played a role in cell–cell interactions, which is confirmed by the increased expression of Cxcr4 in the aneurysm and increased expression of Ackr3 in the vascular wall and adventitia. Similarly, He et al. found that VSMCs interacted with neutrophils and fibroblasts via Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3 axis, thereby deteriorating the progression of acute thoracic aortic dissection [54]. We speculate that Cxcl12–Ackr3 plays a protective role, while Cxcl12–Cxcr4 plays a promoting role in AAA formation. Due to the functional heterogeneity and cross-talk between Cxcr4 and Ackr3 at the receptor level and downstream pathways, it will be interesting to explore the clinical implications and modulators of Cxcl12–Cxcr4/Ackr3.

The developmental origin, anatomical location, and other factors contribute to aortic heterogeneity in a physiological state. In recent years, several studies utilizing scRNAseq have focused on the changes in cell clusters within AAA tissues, consistently revealing the heterogenous nature of aortic cells [55]. Chen et al. reported that the reprogramming of normal SMCs into a mesenchymal stem cell-like state led to the formation of aortic aneurysms [56]. Therefore, it has been revealed that various cell types contribute to the formation of AAA, and the roles of different vascular and immune cells in AAA pathogenesis require further characterization. However, since the transcriptional changes observed in this study are based on descriptive analyses, the changes in immune cells may reflect the consequences of the inflammatory response following aortic wall disruption rather than the causes of AAA initiation or progression.

In summary, we have characterized the cellular landscape of the NC, no-AAA, and AAA group. We speculated that upon Ang II infusion, ECs first sense excessive hemodynamic stimulation, then subsequently releasing and activating various vasoactive substances. The dynamic balance may be disrupted between proliferation and apoptosis of various cells including ECs, SMCs, fibroblasts, and immune cells and ultimately to alter the morphology, structure, and function of blood vessels. Although mice were subjected to the same infusion of Ang II, there were interindividual differences in endothelial shear stress and blood flow. This resulted in two distinct groups (no-AAA and AAA) despite receiving the same treatment. Under the influence of Ang II, clusters of endothelium_EMT and malignant EC may appear, which contributes to endothelial dysfunction and triggers a series of cascades in the immune response, leading to SMC apoptosis, monocyte recruitment, and macrophage accumulation. This provides new clues for the intervention and prevention of AAA formation.

The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021) in National Genomics Data Center (Nucleic Acids Res 2022), China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA012412) that are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/s/mv05GM5r [57, 58].

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

This work was equally supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2019YFA0802104], and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32293204; 81770234].

H.L., P.Z., and W.L.: Methodology and Writing—original draft. H.L.: Formal analysis and Data curation. X.H., P.Z., and J.G.: Data curation.

We thank Dr. Zhiqing Li and Dr. Yiting Jia from Peking University for providing AAA and control samples used in this study.

AAA

abdominal aortic aneurysm

Ang II

angiotensin II

BAPN

β-aminopropionitrile monofumarate

ECs

endothelial cells

NC

negative control

SMCs

smooth muscle cells

scRNAseq

single-cell RNA sequencing

1
Umebayashi
,
R.
,
Uchida
,
H.A.
and
Wada
,
J
. (
2018
)
Abdominal aortic aneurysm in aged population
.
Aging (Milano)
10
,
3650
3651
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101702
2
Sakalihasan
,
N.
,
Michel
,
J.-B.
,
Katsargyris
,
A.
,
Kuivaniemi
,
H.
,
Defraigne
,
J.-O.
,
Nchimi
,
A.
et al.
(
2018
)
Abdominal aortic aneurysms
.
Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers
4
,
34
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0030-7
3
Kochanek
,
K.D.
,
Murphy
,
S.L.
,
Xu
,
J.
and
Arias
,
E
. (
2019
)
Deaths: final data for 2017
.
Natl. Vital Stat. Rep.
68
,
1
77
4
Ortega
,
R.
,
Collado
,
A.
,
Selles
,
F.
,
Gonzalez-Navarro
,
H.
,
Sanz
,
M.J.
,
Real
,
J.T.
et al.
(
2019
)
SGLT-2 (Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibition reduces Ang II (Angiotensin II)-induced dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm in ApoE (Apolipoprotein E) knockout mice
.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
39
,
1614
1628
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312659
5
Satoh
,
K.
,
Nigro
,
P.
,
Matoba
,
T.
,
O’Dell
,
M.R.
,
Cui
,
Z.
,
Shi
,
X.
et al.
(
2009
)
Cyclophilin a enhances vascular oxidative stress and the development of angiotensin II-induced aortic aneurysms
.
Nat. Med.
15
,
649
656
https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1958
6
Daugherty
,
A.
,
Manning
,
M.W.
and
Cassis
,
L.A
. (
2000
)
Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice
.
J. Clin. Invest.
105
,
1605
1612
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI7818
7
Tieu
,
B.C.
,
Lee
,
C.
,
Sun
,
H.
,
Lejeune
,
W.
,
Recinos
,
A.
3rd
,
Ju
,
X.
et al.
(
2009
)
An adventitial IL-6/MCP1 amplification loop accelerates macrophage-mediated vascular inflammation leading to aortic dissection in mice
.
J. Clin. Invest.
119
,
3637
3651
, 38308 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38308
8
Liu
,
Z.
,
Luo
,
H.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Huang
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
B.
,
Ma
,
K.
et al.
(
2012
)
Hyperhomocysteinemia exaggerates adventitial inflammation and angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm in mice
.
Circ. Res.
111
,
1261
1273
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.270520
9
Deng
,
G.G.
,
Martin-McNulty
,
B.
,
Sukovich
,
D.A.
,
Freay
,
A.
,
Halks-Miller
,
M.
,
Thinnes
,
T.
et al.
(
2003
)
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator plays a critical role in angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Circ. Res.
92
,
510
517
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000061571.49375.E1
10
Gavazzi
,
G.
,
Deffert
,
C.
,
Trocme
,
C.
,
Schäppi
,
M.
,
Herrmann
,
F.R.
and
Krause
,
K.H
. (
2007
)
NOX1 deficiency protects from aortic dissection in response to Angiotensin II
.
Hypertension
50
,
189
196
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089706
11
Kanematsu
,
Y.
,
Kanematsu
,
M.
,
Kurihara
,
C.
,
Tsou
,
T.L.
,
Nuki
,
Y.
,
Liang
,
E.I.
et al.
(
2010
)
Pharmacologically induced thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in mice
.
Hypertension
55
,
1267
1274
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140558
12
Sakalihasan
,
N.
,
Limet
,
R.
and
Defawe
,
O.D
. (
2005
)
Abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Lancet
365
,
1577
1589
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66459-8
13
DeRoo
,
E.
,
Stranz
,
A.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Hsieh
,
M.
,
Se
,
C.
and
Zhou
,
T
. (
2022
)
Endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Biomolecules
12
, 509 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12040509
14
Lu
,
H.
,
Howatt
,
D.A.
,
Balakrishnan
,
A.
,
Moorleghen
,
J.J.
,
Rateri
,
D.L.
,
Cassis
,
L.A.
et al.
(
2015
)
Subcutaneous Angiotensin II infusion using osmotic pumps induces aortic aneurysms in mice
.
J. Vis. Exp.
103
, 53191 https://doi.org/10.3791/53191
15
Li
,
H.
,
Guo
,
J.
,
Jia
,
Y.
,
Kong
,
W.
and
Li
,
W
. (
2021
)
LOXL4 abrogation does not exaggerate Angiotensin II-induced thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm in mice
.
Genes (Basel)
12
, 513 https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040513
16
Hu
,
C.
,
Li
,
T.
,
Xu
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
X.
,
Li
,
F.
,
Bai
,
J.
et al.
(
2023
)
CellMarker 2.0: an updated database of manually curated cell markers in human/mouse and web tools based on scRNA-seq data
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
51
,
D870
D876
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac947
17
Spartalis
,
E.
,
Spartalis
,
M.
,
Athanasiou
,
A.
,
Paschou
,
S.A.
,
Patelis
,
N.
,
Voudris
,
V.
et al.
(
2020
)
Endothelium in aortic aneurysm disease: new insights
.
Curr. Med. Chem.
27
,
1081
1088
https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867326666190923151959
18
Johnston
,
W.F.
,
Salmon
,
M.
,
Su
,
G.
,
Lu
,
G.
,
Stone
,
M.L.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
et al.
(
2013
)
Genetic and pharmacologic disruption of interleukin-1β signaling inhibits experimental aortic aneurysm formation
.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
33
,
294
304
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300432
19
Xiong
,
W.
,
MacTaggart
,
J.
,
Knispel
,
R.
,
Worth
,
J.
,
Persidsky
,
Y.
and
Baxter
,
B.T
. (
2009
)
Blocking TNF-alpha attenuates aneurysm formation in a murine model
.
J. Immunol.
183
,
2741
2746
https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803164
20
Sun
,
J.
,
Deng
,
H.
,
Zhou
,
Z.
,
Xiong
,
X.
and
Gao
,
L
. (
2018
)
Endothelium as a potential target for teatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.
2018
, 6306542 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6306542
21
Kalucka
,
J.
,
Goveia
,
J.
,
Rohlenova
,
K.
,
Dumas
,
S.J.
,
Meta
,
E.
et al.
(
2020
)
Single-cell transcriptome atlas of murine endothelial cells
.
Cell
180
,
764
779
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.015
22
Rodor
,
J.
,
Chen
,
S.H.
,
Scanlon
,
J.P.
,
Monteiro
,
J.P.
,
Caudrillier
,
A.
,
Sweta
,
S.
et al.
(
2022
)
Single-cell RNA sequencing profiling of mouse endothelial cells in response to pulmonary arterial hypertension
.
Cardiovasc. Res.
118
,
2519
2534
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab296
23
Kalluri
,
A.S.
,
Vellarikkal
,
S.K.
,
Edelman
,
E.R.
,
Nguyen
,
L.
,
Subramanian
,
A.
,
Ellinor
,
P.T.
et al.
(
2019
)
Single-cell analysis of the normal mouse aorta reveals functionally distinct endothelial cell populations
.
Circulation
140
,
147
163
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038362
24
Bou Khzam
,
L.
,
Son
,
N.H.
,
Mullick
,
A.E.
,
Abumrad
,
N.A.
and
Goldberg
,
I.J
. (
2020
)
Endothelial cell CD36 deficiency prevents normal angiogenesis and vascular repair
.
Am. J. Transl. Res.
12
,
7737
7761
25
Son
,
N.H.
,
Basu
,
D.
,
Samovski
,
D.
,
Pietka
,
T.A.
,
Peche
,
V.S.
,
Willecke
,
F.
et al.
(
2018
)
Endothelial cell CD36 optimizes tissue fatty acid uptake
.
J. Clin. Invest.
128
,
4329
4342
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI99315
26
Koundouros
,
N.
and
Poulogiannis
,
G
. (
2020
)
Reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer
.
Br. J. Cancer
122
,
4
22
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0650-z
27
Young
,
S.G.
,
Fong
,
L.G.
,
Beigneux
,
A.P.
,
Allan
,
C.M.
,
He
,
C.
,
Jiang
,
H.
et al.
(
2019
)
GPIHBP1 and lipoprotein lipase
.
Partners in Plasma Triglyceride Metabolism. Cell Metab
30
,
51
65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.023
28
Mukohda
,
M.
,
Stump
,
M.
,
Ketsawatsomkron
,
P.
,
Hu
,
C.
,
Quelle
,
F.W.
and
Sigmund
,
C.D
. (
2016
)
Endothelial PPAR-γ provides vascular protection from IL-1β-induced oxidative stress
.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
310
,
H39
48
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00490.2015
29
Wang
,
W.D.
,
Sun
,
R.
and
Chen
,
Y.X
. (
2018
)
PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone alters the temporal and spatial distribution of inflammation during abdominal aortic aneurysm formation
.
Mol. Med. Rep.
18
,
3421
3428
https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9311
30
Jones
,
A.
,
Deb
,
R.
,
Torsney
,
E.
,
Howe
,
F.
,
Dunkley
,
M.
,
Gnaneswaran
,
Y.
et al.
(
2009
)
Rosiglitazone reduces the development and rupture of experimental aortic aneurysms
.
Circulation
119
,
3125
3132
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852467
31
Lehrke
,
M.
and
Lazar
,
M.A
. (
2005
)
The many faces of PPARgamma
.
Cell
123
,
993
999
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.026
32
Kanda
,
T.
,
Brown
,
J.D.
,
Orasanu
,
G.
,
Vogel
,
S.
,
Gonzalez
,
F.J.
,
Sartoretto
,
J.
et al.
(
2009
)
PPARgamma in the endothelium regulates metabolic responses to high-fat diet in mice
.
J. Clin. Invest.
119
,
110
124
, 36233 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36233
33
Kennedy
,
B.K.
,
Berger
,
S.L.
,
Brunet
,
A.
,
Campisi
,
J.
,
Cuervo
,
A.M.
,
Epel
,
E.S.
et al.
(
2014
)
Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease
.
Cell
159
,
709
713
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039
34
Zhang
,
W.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Yan
,
P.
,
Ren
,
J.
,
Song
,
M.
,
Li
,
J.
et al.
(
2020
)
A single-cell transcriptomic landscape of primate arterial aging
.
Nat. Commun.
11
, 2202 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15997-0
35
Bruemmer
,
D.
,
Collins
,
A.R.
,
Noh
,
G.
,
Wang
,
W.
,
Territo
,
M.
,
Arias-Magallona
,
S.
et al.
(
2003
)
Angiotensin II-accelerated atherosclerosis and aneurysm formation is attenuated in osteopontin-deficient mice
.
J. Clin. Invest.
112
,
1318
1331
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18141
36
Deng
,
C.C.
,
Hu
,
Y.F.
,
Zhu
,
D.H.
,
Cheng
,
Q.
,
Gu
,
J.J.
,
Feng
,
Q.L.
et al.
(
2021
)
Single-cell RNA-seq reveals fibroblast heterogeneity and increased mesenchymal fibroblasts in human fibrotic skin diseases
.
Nat. Commun.
12
, 3709 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24110-y
37
Soliman
,
H.
,
Tung
,
L.W.
and
Rossi
,
F.M.V
. (
2021
)
Fibroblast and myofibroblast subtypes: single cell sequencing
.
Methods Mol. Biol.
2299
,
49
84
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1382-5_4
38
Anderson
,
M.E.
,
Brown
,
J.H.
and
Bers
,
D.M
. (
2011
)
CaMKII in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure
.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
51
,
468
473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.01.012
39
Zhao
,
L.
,
Cheng
,
G.
,
Jin
,
R.
,
Afzal
,
M.R.
,
Samanta
,
A.
,
Xuan
,
Y.T.
et al.
(
2016
)
Deletion of Interleukin-6 atenuates pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction
.
Circ. Res.
118
,
1918
1929
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308688
40
Kumar
,
S.
,
Wang
,
G.
,
Zheng
,
N.
,
Cheng
,
W.
,
Ouyang
,
K.
,
Lin
,
H.
et al.
(
2019
)
HIMF (hypoxia-induced mitogenic factor)-IL (Interleukin)-6 signaling mediates cardiomyocyte-fibroblast crosstalk to promote cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis
.
Hypertension
73
,
1058
1070
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12267
41
Forte
,
A.
,
Della Corte
,
A.
,
De Feo
,
M.
,
Cerasuolo
,
F.
and
Cipollaro
,
M
. (
2010
)
Role of myofibroblasts in vascular remodelling: focus on restenosis and aneurysm
.
Cardiovasc. Res.
88
,
395
405
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvq224
42
Huang
,
A.
,
Li
,
H.
,
Zeng
,
C.
,
Chen
,
W.
,
Wei
,
L.
,
Liu
,
Y.
et al.
(
2020
)
Endogenous CCN5 participates in Angiotensin II/TGF-β1 networking of cardiac fibrosis in high Angiotensin II-induced hypertensive heart failure
.
Front. Pharmacol.
11
, 1235 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01235
43
Jeong
,
D.
,
Lee
,
M.A.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
D.K.
,
Kho
,
C.
,
Oh
,
J.G.
et al.
(
2016
)
Matricellular protein CCN5 reverses established cardiac fibrosis
.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
67
,
1556
1568
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.030
44
Wu
,
B.
,
Chien
,
E.Y.T.
,
Mol
,
C.D.
,
Fenalti
,
G.
,
Liu
,
W.
,
Katritch
,
V.
et al.
(
2010
)
Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists
.
Science
330
,
1066
1071
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194396
45
Khare
,
T.
,
Bissonnette
,
M.
and
Khare
,
S
. (
2021
)
CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis in colorectal cancer: therapeutic target in preclinical and clinical studies
.
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
22
, 7371 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147371
46
Murad
,
H.A.S.
,
Rafeeq
,
M.M.
and
Alqurashi
,
T.M.A
. (
2021
)
Role and implications of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis in atherosclerosis: still a debate
.
Ann. Med.
53
,
1598
1612
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1974084
47
Huynh
,
C.
,
Dingemanse
,
J.
,
Meyer Zu Schwabedissen
,
H.E.
and
Sidharta
,
P.N
. (
2020
)
Relevance of the CXCR4/CXCR7-CXCL12 axis and its effect in pathophysiological conditions
.
Pharmacol. Res.
161
,
105092
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105092
48
Forsdahl
,
S.H.
,
Singh
,
K.
,
Solberg
,
S.
and
Jacobsen
,
B.K
. (
2009
)
Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 7-year prospective study: the Tromsø Study, 1994-2001
.
Circulation
119
,
2202
2208
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.817619
49
Golledge
,
J.
,
Muller
,
J.
,
Daugherty
,
A.
and
Norman
,
P
. (
2006
)
Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management
.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
26
,
2605
2613
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000245819.32762.cb
50
Li
,
B.
,
Song
,
X.
,
Guo
,
W.
,
Hou
,
Y.
,
Hu
,
H.
,
Ge
,
W.
et al.
(
2021
)
Single-cell transcriptome profiles reveal fibrocytes as potential targets of cell therapies for abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
8
, 753711 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.753711
51
Hong
,
Y.K.
,
Cheng
,
T.L.
,
Hsu
,
C.K.
,
Lee
,
F.T.
,
Chang
,
B.I.
,
Wang
,
K.C.
et al.
(
2024
)
Regulation of matrix reloading by tumor endothelial marker 1 protects against abdominal aortic aneurysm
.
Int. J. Biol. Sci.
20
,
3691
3709
https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.93526
52
Shimizu
,
K.
,
Mitchell
,
R.N.
and
Libby
,
P
. (
2006
)
Inflammation and cellular immune responses in abdominal aortic aneurysms
.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
26
,
987
994
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000214999.12921.4f
53
Hao
,
Y.M.
,
Yuan
,
H.Q.
,
Ren
,
Z.
,
Qu
,
S.L.
,
Liu
,
L.S.,
Dang
,
H.
et al.
(
2019
)
Endothelial to mesenchymal transition in atherosclerotic vascular remodeling
.
Clinica Chimica Acta
490
,
34
38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.018
54
He
,
Y.B.
,
Jin
,
H.Z.
,
Zhao
,
J.L.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
Ma
,
W.R.
,
Xing
,
J.
et al.
(
2022
)
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals differential cell subpopulations and distinct phenotype transition in normal and dissected ascending aorta
.
Mol. Med.
28
, 158 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-022-00584-4
55
Yu
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
J.
,
Gao
,
A.
,
Zhang
,
M.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Yu
,
F.
et al.
(
2022
)
An intersegmental single-cell profile reveals aortic heterogeneity and identifies a novel Malat1+ vascular smooth muscle subtype involved in abdominal aortic aneurysm formation
.
Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.
7
, 125 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00943-x
56
Chen
,
P.Y.
,
Qin
,
L.
,
Li
,
G.
,
Malagon-Lopez
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Bergaya
,
S.
et al.
(
2020
)
Smooth muscle cell reprogramming in aortic aneurysms
.
Cell Stem Cell
26
,
542
557
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2020.02.013
57
Chen
,
T.
,
Chen
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Zhu
,
J.
,
Tang
,
B.
,
Wang
,
A.
et al.
(
2021
)
The genome sequence archive family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types
.
Genomics. Proteomics Bioinformatics
19
,
578
583
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.001
58
Xue
,
Y.
,
Bao
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Z.
,
Zhao
,
W.
,
Xiao
,
J.
and
He
,
S
. (
2022
)
Database resources of the national genomics data center, China National Center for bioinformation in 2022
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
50
,
D27
D38
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab951
This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

Supplementary data