Recent research indicates that the pathophysiology of breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) is more complex than simple axillary lymphatic obstruction as a result of the cancer treatment. Uneven distribution of swelling (involvement of the mid-arm region is common, but the hand is often spared) is puzzling. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that local differences in lymphatic drainage contribute to the regionality of the oedema. Using lymphoscintigraphy, we measured the removal rate constant, k (representing local lymph flow per unit distribution volume, VD), for 99mTc-labelled human immunoglobulin G in the oedematous proximal forearm, and in the hand (finger web) in women in whom the hand was unaffected. Tracer was injected subcutaneously, and the depot plus the rest of the arm was monitored with a γ-radiation camera for up to 6 h. VD was assessed from image width. Contralateral arms served as controls. k was 25% lower in oedematous forearm tissue than in the control arm (BCRL, -0.070±0.026%·min-1; control, -0.093±0.028%·min-1; mean±S.D.; P = 0.012) and VD was greater. In the non-oedematous hand of the BCRL arm, k was 18% higher than in the control hand (BCRL, -0.110±0.027%·min-1; control, -0.095±0.028%·min-1; P = 0.057) and 59% higher than forearm k on the BCRL side (P = 0.0014). VD did not differ between the hands. Images of the BCRL arm following hand injection showed diffuse activity in the superficial tissues, sometimes extending almost to the shoulder. A possible interpretation is that the hand is spared in some patients because local lymph flow is increased and diverted along collateral dermal routes. The results support the hypothesis that regional differences in surviving lymphatic function contribute to the distribution of swelling.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 18 2001
Differences in lymph drainage between swollen and non-swollen regions in arms with breast-cancer-related lymphoedema
A. W. B. STANTON;
*Division of Physiological Medicine (Dermatology), Department of Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, U.K.
†Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, U.K.
Correspondence: Dr A. W. B. Stanton (e-mail [email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
W. E. SVENSSON;
W. E. SVENSSON
†Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, U.K.
‡Department of Radiology, Ealing Hospital, Uxbridge Road, Southall, Middlesex UB1 3HW, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
R. H. MELLOR;
R. H. MELLOR
*Division of Physiological Medicine (Dermatology), Department of Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
A. M. PETERS;
A. M. PETERS
†Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, U.K.
§Nuclear Medicine Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
J. R. LEVICK;
J. R. LEVICK
ǁDepartment of Physiology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
P. S. MORTIMER
P. S. MORTIMER
*Division of Physiological Medicine (Dermatology), Department of Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Portland Press Ltd
Received:
October 16 2000
Revision Received:
February 16 2001
Accepted:
April 18 2001
Online ISSN: 1470-8736
Print ISSN: 0143-5221
The Biochemical Society and the Medical Research Society © 2001
2001
Clin Sci (Lond) (2001) 101 (2): 131–140.
Article history
Received:
October 16 2000
Revision Received:
February 16 2001
Accepted:
April 18 2001
Citation
A. W. B. STANTON, W. E. SVENSSON, R. H. MELLOR, A. M. PETERS, J. R. LEVICK, P. S. MORTIMER; Differences in lymph drainage between swollen and non-swollen regions in arms with breast-cancer-related lymphoedema. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 August 2001; 101 (2): 131–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1010131
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Biochemical Society Member Sign in
Sign InSign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionGet Access To This Article
Cited By
Open Access for all
We offer compliant routes for all authors from 2025. With library support, there will be no author nor reader charges in 5 journals. Check here |