Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
August 2001
Commentary|
July 17 2001
To bolus or not to bolus–is that the question?
GEORGE C. KRAMER
;
GEORGE C. KRAMER
1Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555–0591, U.S.A.(ON BEHALF OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD)
Search for other works by this author on:
CHRISTER H. SVENSEN
;
CHRISTER H. SVENSEN
1Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555–0591, U.S.A.(ON BEHALF OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD)
Search for other works by this author on:
DONALD S. PROUGH
DONALD S. PROUGH
1Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555–0591, U.S.A.(ON BEHALF OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD)
Search for other works by this author on:
Clin Sci (Lond) (2001) 101 (2): 181–183.
Citation
GEORGE C. KRAMER, CHRISTER H. SVENSEN, DONALD S. PROUGH; To bolus or not to bolus–is that the question?. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 August 2001; 101 (2): 181–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1010181
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Biochemical Society Member Sign in
Sign InSign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionGet Access To This Article
2
Views
0
Citations
Cited By
Related Articles
A critical evaluation of the anabolic response after bolus or continuous feeding in COPD and healthy older adults
Clin Sci (Lond) (January,2018)
Expressed monophasic action potential alternans before the onset of ventricular arrhythmias induced by intracoronary bolus administration of endothelin-1 in dogs
Clin Sci (Lond) (September,2002)