Impaired long-axis motion is a sensitive marker of systolic myocardial dysfunction, but no data are available that relate long-axis changes in systole with those in diastole, particularly in subjects with diastolic dysfunction and a ‘normal’ left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. A total of 311 subjects (including 105 normal healthy volunteers) aged 20-89 years with variable degrees of systolic function (LV ejection fraction range 0.15-0.84) and diastolic function were studied using tissue Doppler echocardiography and M-mode echocardiography to determine mean mitral annular amplitude and peak velocity in systole and early and late diastole. The LV systolic mitral annular amplitude (SLAX, where LAX is long-axis amplitude) and peak velocity (Sm) correlated well with the respective early diastolic components (ELAX and Em) and late diastolic (atrial) components (ALAX and Am). A non-linear equation fitted better than a linear relationship (non-linear model: SLAX against ELAX, r2 = 0.67; Sm against Em, r2 = 0.60; SLAX against ALAX and Sm against Am, r2 = 0.42). After adjusting for age, sex and heart rate, linear relationships of early diastolic (ELAX, r2 = 0.70; Em, r2 = 0.60) and late diastolic (ALAX, r2 = 0.61; Am, r2 = 0.64) long-axis amplitudes and velocities with the respective values for SLAX and Sm were found, even in those subjects with apparently ‘isolated’ diastolic dysfunction. Long-axis changes in systole or diastole did not correlate with Doppler mitral velocities. We conclude that ventricular long-axis changes in early diastole are closely related to systolic function, even in subjects with diastolic dysfunction. ‘Pure’ or isolated diastolic dysfunction is uncommon.
Left ventricular long-axis changes in early diastole and systole: impact of systolic function on diastole
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
Gabriel W. YIP, Yan ZHANG, Peggy Y. TAN, Mei WANG, Pik-Yuk HO, L.-Å. BRODIN, John E. SANDERSON; Left ventricular long-axis changes in early diastole and systole: impact of systolic function on diastole. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 May 2002; 102 (5): 515–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1020515
Download citation file: