At least four independent studies in different clinical settings showed that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) such as enalapril effectively decrease plasma levels of circulating adhesion molecules (cAMs). To examine whether this effect may be mediated by the decreased action of angiotensin, we compared the effects of enalapril with the direct angiotensin-II antagonist, losartan, on plasma levels of cAMs, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1). In a randomized trial, we recruited 32 untreated patients (19 male, aged 59±13years) with hypertension, who received either enalapril (mean dose 17mg/day) or losartan (mean dose 77mg/day) at equipotent doses. Enalapril decreased plasma levels of all cAMs after 8weeks of treatment: cE-selectin levels decreased by 13% (P = 0.007), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (cICAM-1) by 15% (P = 0.002) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (cVCAM-1) by 19% (P = 0.003). Similarly, enalapril decreased plasma levels of MCP-1 by 13% (P<0.001). Losartan did not significantly change cAM or MCP-1 plasma concentrations after 8weeks of treatment: cE-selectin levels decreased by 3%, cICAM-1 by 5%, cVCAM-1 by 8%, whereas MCP-1 increased by 2% (all P = NS; not significant). The enalapril effect on percentage changes of cVCAM-1 was significantly different from losartan (P = 0.0429). Eight weeks of antihypertensive treatment with enalapril but not losartan, significantly decreased plasma levels of cAMs and MCP-1 in hypertensive patients. The beneficial effects of ACE-Is on cAMs may have implications for atherogenesis and the reduction of cardiovascular events, which cannot be fully explained by their antihypertensive effects alone.
Effects of enalapril and losartan on circulating adhesion molecules and monocyte chemotactic protein-1
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
B. JILMA, F.L. LI-SAW-HEE, O.F. WAGNER, D.G. BEEVERS, G.Y.H. LIP; Effects of enalapril and losartan on circulating adhesion molecules and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 August 2002; 103 (2): 131–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1030131
Download citation file: