Preclinical and clinical studies indicate a role for AS ODNs (antisense oligonucleotides) as therapeutics for malignant diseases. The principle of antisense technology is the sequence-specific binding of an AS ODN to the target mRNA, resulting in a translational arrest. The specificity of hybridization makes antisense strategy attractive to selectively modulate the expression of genes involved in the pathogenesis of malignant diseases. One antisense drug has been approved for local therapy of CMV (cytomegalovirus) retinitis, and a number of AS ODNs are currently being tested in clinical trials, including AS ODN targeting Bcl-2, XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein) and TGF-β-2 (transforming growth factor β-2). AS ODNs are well tolerated and may have therapeutic activity. In particular, an AS ODN to Bcl-2 has been tested in phase III clinical trials in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, multiple myeloma and malignant melanoma. In this review, therapeutic concepts, clinical studies and new promising molecular targets to treat malignancies with AS ODNs are summarized.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2006
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
Review Article|
March 15 2006
Antisense therapy in malignant diseases: status quo and quo vadis?
Ingo Tamm
1Department for Haematology and Oncology, Charité, Campus Virchow, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: Dr Ingo Tamm (email [email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Portland Press Ltd
Received:
September 16 2005
Revision Received:
November 16 2005
Accepted:
December 02 2005
Accepted Manuscript online:
March 15 2006
Online ISSN: 1470-8736
Print ISSN: 0143-5221
The Biochemical Society
2006
Clin Sci (Lond) (2006) 110 (4): 427–442.
Article history
Received:
September 16 2005
Revision Received:
November 16 2005
Accepted:
December 02 2005
Accepted Manuscript online:
March 15 2006
Citation
Ingo Tamm; Antisense therapy in malignant diseases: status quo and quo vadis?. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 April 2006; 110 (4): 427–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20050284
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.