Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. More women than men have strokes each year, in part because women live longer. Women have poorer functional outcomes, are more likely to need nursing home care and have higher rates of recurrent stroke compared with men. Despite continued advancements in primary prevention, innovative acute therapies and ongoing developments in neurorehabilitation, stroke incidence and mortality continue to increase due to the aging of the U.S. population. Sex chromosomes (XX compared with XY), sex hormones (oestrogen and androgen), epigenetic regulation and environmental factors all contribute to sex differences. Ischaemic sensitivity varies over the lifespan, with females having an “ischaemia resistant” phenotype that wanes after menopause, which has recently been modelled in the laboratory. Pharmacological therapies for acute ischaemic stroke are limited. The only pharmacological treatment for stroke approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which must be used within hours of stroke onset and has a number of contraindications. Pre-clinical studies have identified a number of potentially efficacious neuroprotective agents; however, nothing has been effectively translated into therapy in clinical practice. This may be due, in part, to the overwhelming use of young male rodents in pre-clinical research, as well as lack of sex-specific design and analysis in clinical trials. The review will summarize the current clinical evidence for sex differences in ischaemic stroke, and will discuss sex differences in the cellular mechanisms of acute ischaemic injury, highlighting cell death and immune/inflammatory pathways that may contribute to these clinical differences.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2017
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
An MRI angiogram of the brain vasculature (arteries). Articles in the area of small vessels, dementia and chronic diseases published in Clinical Science throughout 2017 are being gathered together as a collection that can be viewed at http://www.portlandpresspublishing.com/cc/small-vessels.
Review Article|
March 17 2017
Sex differences in ischaemic stroke: potential cellular mechanisms
Anjali Chauhan;
Anjali Chauhan
1Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Hope Moser;
Hope Moser
2Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Louise D. McCullough
3Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A.
Correspondence: Louise D. McCullough ([email protected])
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Portland Press Ltd
Received:
November 02 2016
Revision Received:
December 16 2016
Accepted:
January 09 2017
Online ISSN: 1470-8736
Print ISSN: 0143-5221
© 2017 The Author(s). published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society
2017
Clin Sci (Lond) (2017) 131 (7): 533–552.
Article history
Received:
November 02 2016
Revision Received:
December 16 2016
Accepted:
January 09 2017
Citation
Anjali Chauhan, Hope Moser, Louise D. McCullough; Sex differences in ischaemic stroke: potential cellular mechanisms. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 April 2017; 131 (7): 533–552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20160841
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.