Huisman and de Zeeuw consider that the acute haemodynamic events which follow renal artery stenosis may be due to spasm and subsequent relaxation of the renal artery, and disagree with our explanations [l, 21. In addition, they suggest that baroreceptor reflexes are responsible for the absence of a rise in arterial pressure after complete occlusion of the renal artery and reject our simple hydraulic explanation. We believe that these alternative explanations, though plausible, are incorrect.
Skip Nav Destination
Correspondence| April 01 1985
W. P. Anderson;
Clin Sci (Lond) (1985) 68 (4): 480–482.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
W. P. Anderson, P. I. Korner; AUTHOR'S REPLY. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 April 1985; 68 (4): 480–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0680480
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
Get Access To This Article
Buy This Article