The objective of the present study was to determine the autonomic effects of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blocker therapy in heart failure. In a randomized double-blind cross-over study, we compared the effects of candesartan and placebo on baroreflex sensitivity and on heart rate variability at rest, during stress and during 24h monitoring. Acute effects were assessed 4h after oral candesartan (8mg) and chronic effects after 4 weeks of treatment (dose titrated to 16mg daily). The study group comprised 21 patients with heart failure [mean (S.E.M.) ejection fraction 33% (1%)], in the absence of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. We found that acute candesartan was not different from placebo in its effects on blood pressure or mean RR interval. Chronic candesartan significantly reduced blood pressure [placebo, 137 (3)/82 (3)mmHg; candesartan, 121 (4)/75 (2)mmHg; P<0.001; values are mean (S.E.M.)], but had no effect on mean RR interval [placebo, 857 (25)ms; candesartan, 857 (21)ms]. Compared with placebo there were no significant effects of acute or chronic candesartan on heart rate variability in the time domain and no consistent effects in the frequency domain. Baroreflex sensitivity assessed by the phenylephrine bolus method was significantly increased after chronic candesartan [placebo, 3.5 (0.5)ms/mmHg; candesartan, 4.8 (0.7)ms/mmHg; P<0.05], although there were no changes in cross-spectral baroreflex sensitivity. Thus, in contrast with previous results with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockade in heart failure did not increase heart rate variability, and there was no consistent effect on baroreflex sensitivity.
Effects of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockade on cardiac vagal control in heart failure
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
J. C. VAILE, S. CHOWDHARY, F. OSMAN, H. F. ROSS, J. FLETCHER, W. A. LITTLER, J. H. COOTE, J. N. TOWNEND; Effects of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockade on cardiac vagal control in heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 1 December 2001; 101 (6): 559–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1010559
Download citation file: