1-8 of 8
Keywords: femoral artery
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Clin Sci (Lond) (2004) 106 (2): 163–171.
Published: 01 February 2004
...Jennifer M. HUGHES; Stuart J. BUND In the present study, myogenic properties of femoral arteries from control hindlimbs and those distal to external iliac artery partial ligation of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and normotensive Wistar–Kyoto (WKY) rats were assessed. Arterial pressure...
Clin Sci (Lond) (2001) 101 (4): 385–393.
Published: 14 September 2001
..., but is not significantly different in SHR femoral arteries, compared with those from WKY rats. Additionally, wall stress at estimated in vivo pressures under passive and active conditions are similar in SHR and WKY rat arteries. These data demonstrate that increased M/L ratios in resistance arteries from SHRs...
Clin Sci (Lond) (1998) 95 (6): 681–686.
Published: 01 December 1998
... pressure was recorded, blood samples were taken and the animals killed. Isolated femoral arteries were dissected and mounted on a pressure myograph and myogenic tone was assessed over a range of intravascular pressures from 40 to 160 mmHg. Histologically the arteries were comparatively examined for gross...
Clin Sci (Lond) (1990) 78 (4): 431–435.
Published: 01 April 1990
...Christopher J. H. Jones; Donald R. J. Singer; Nicholas V. Watkins; Graham A. MacGregor; Colin G. Caro 1. We compared the velocity waveforms in the superficial femoral artery measured by multichannel Doppler ultrasound in 45 subjects: 21 patients with untreated essential hypertension and 24 normal...
Clin Sci (Lond) (1980) 58 (1): 29–35.
Published: 01 January 1980
...% (mean ± sem, n = 12), whereas those after femoral artery infusions at the same dose were reduced by a mean of only 27·2 ± 4·9%( n = 12). 4. The pattern of extraction seen with noradrenaline infusions administered in a similar manner was the reverse of that with angiotensin II. There was a 28·9 ± 6·8...