GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1) and its mimetic exendin-4 are used against Type 2 diabetes. C-peptide has also proven promising to enhance insulin action. Since insulin secretion in vivo can be rapidly tuned by changes in islet microcirculation, we evaluated the influence of GLP-1, exendin-4 and C-peptide on pancreatic IBF (islet blood flow), and dynamic changes in insulin secretion and glycaemia in the rat. Adult male Wistar rats were divided into four groups given intravenous saline, GLP-1, exendin-4 or C-peptide respectively and administered either saline or 30% glucose. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of intravenous infusion of different doses of exendin-4 into either the femoral vein or the portal vein on islet microcirculation. A non-radioactive microsphere technique was adopted to measure the regional blood flow. Both GLP-1 and exendin-4 prevented the glucose-induced PBF (pancreatic blood flow) redistribution into the islets. Infusion of exendin-4 into the portal vein did not alter pancreatic islet microcirculation, while infusion of exendin-4 into femoral vein significantly decreased basal IBF. C-peptide increased basal IBF and the proportion of IBF out of total PBF, but did not affect the islet microcirculation after glucose administration. GLP-1, exendin-4 and C-peptide stimulated insulin secretion and significantly decreased glycaemia. Blocking NO formation did not prevent the decreased IBF and post-load glycaemia evoked by exendin-4, but further decreased IBF and KBF (kidney blood flow) and increased basal glycaemia. Blocking the vagus nerve enhanced pancreatic IBF and further decreased post-load glycaemia and KBF and increased basal glycaemia. The vascular modulatory effect on pancreatic islet microcirculation described herein, with subsequent effects on in vivo insulin secretion and glycaemia, might be one of the mechanisms underlying the anti-diabetic actions of GLP-1 and its long acting mimetic exendin-4, as well as that of C-peptide.

With the already heightened demand placed on organ donation, stem cell therapy has become a tantalizing idea to provide glucose-responsive insulin-producing cells to Type 1 diabetic patients as an alternative to islet transplantation. Multiple groups have developed varied approaches to create a population of cells with the appropriate characteristics. Both adult and embryonic stem cells have received an enormous amount of attention as possible sources of insulin-producing cells. Although adult stem cells lack the pluripotent nature of their embryonic counterparts, they appear to avoid the ethical debate that has centred around the latter. This may limit the eventual application of embryonic stem cells, which have already shown promise in early mouse models. One must also consider the potential of stem cells to form teratomas, a complication which would prove devastating in an immunologically compromised transplant recipient. The present review looks at the progress to date in both the adult and embryonic stem cells fields as potential treatments for diabetes. We also consider some of the limitations of stem cell therapy and the potential complications that may develop with their use.

Patients with diabetes are often treated with a statin for hyperlipidaemia and an ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist for hypertension or albuminuria. These drugs may also exert beneficial metabolic effects, causing improved glucose tolerance in patients. Gender-related differences have also been observed in the clinical responsiveness to these drugs, but the mechanism behind this is unclear. In the present study, we have investigated whether these drugs and the fatty acid palmitate influence the pancreatic microcirculation, thereby having an impact on insulin secretion and glycaemia in vivo , in spontaneously diabetic male and female Goto–Kakizaki rats. In male rats, pancreatic IBF (islet blood flow) and total PBF (pancreatic blood flow) were increased significantly by pravastatin, captopril and irbesartan. Serum insulin levels were increased by pravastatin and captopril. Palmitate suppressed pancreatic IBF and increased blood glucose. In female animals, pancreatic IBF was stimulated by captopril, candesartan and irbesartan. Total PBF was increased by captopril, candesartan and irbesartan, and by pravastatin. Palmitate suppressed pancreatic IBF and serum insulin secretion. In conclusion, the present study lends support to the view that a local pancreatic RAS (renin–angiotensin system) and pravastatin may be selectively influencing the pancreatic microcirculation and therefore affecting insulin secretion and glycaemia. NEFAs (non-esterified fatty acids) impaired pancreatic IBF, suppressed insulin secretion and increased blood glucose. Substantial gender-related differences in the vascular and metabolic responses to these drugs prevail in this animal model of diabetes.

Pravastatin, irbesartan and captopril are frequently used in the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes. These drugs also exert beneficial metabolic effects, causing an improved glucose tolerance in patients, but the precise mechanisms by which this is achieved remain elusive. To this end, we have studied whether these drugs influence insulin secretion in vivo through effects on islet blood perfusion. Captopril (3 mg/kg of body weight), irbesartan (3 mg/kg of body weight) and pravastatin (0.5 mg/kg of body weight) were injected intravenously into anaesthetized female Wistar rats. Blood flow rates were determined by a microsphere technique. Blood glucose concentrations were measured with test reagent strips and serum insulin concentrations were measured by ELISA. Pancreatic blood flow was markedly increased by pravastatin ( P <0.001), captopril ( P <0.05) and irbesartan ( P <0.01). Pancreatic islet blood flow was significantly and preferentially enhanced after the administration of captopril ( P <0.01), irbesartan ( P <0.01) and pravastatin ( P <0.001). Kidney blood flow was enhanced significantly by pravastatin ( P <0.01), irbesartan ( P <0.05) and captopril ( P <0.01). Captopril and pravastatin also enhanced late-phase insulin secretion and positively influenced glycaemia in intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests. In conclusion, the present study suggests that a local pancreatic renin–angiotensin system and pravastatin treatment may be selectively controlling pancreatic islet blood flow, augmenting insulin secretion and thereby improving glucose tolerance. Our findings indicate significant gender-related differences in the vascular response to these agents. Since statins and renin–angiotensin system inhibitors are frequently used by diabetic patients, the antidiabetic actions of these drugs reported previously might occur, in part, through the beneficial direct islet effects shown in the present study.