In April 2013 the National Geographic magazine carried the cover title ‘Reviving extinct species, we can, but should we?’ suggesting that the technical challenges had been met, but some ethical concerns remained unresolved. Seven years later it is clear that this is not the case. Here we consider the technical scope, the uncertainties, and some of the bioethical issues raised by the future prospect of de-extinction. Biodiversity and welfare will not always align, and when a clash is unavoidable, a trade-off will be necessary, seeking the greatest overall value. De-extinction challenges our current conservation mind-set that seeks to preserve the species and population diversity that currently exists. But if we want to sustain and enhance a biodiverse natural world we might have to be forward looking and embrace the notion of bio-novelty by focussing more on ecosystem stability and resilience, rather than backward looking and seeking to try and recreate lost worlds.
Portland Press would like to thank Dr Silvia Camporesi (Kings College London) for her input into the initial discussions around some of the concepts covered in this issue of Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, and for securing some of the contributors and content.
Search for other works by this author on:
Perspective| October 11 2019
Creating proxies of extinct species: the bioethics of de-extinction
Philip J. Seddon;
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
Philip J. Seddon, Mike King; Creating proxies of extinct species: the bioethics of de-extinction. Emerg Top Life Sci 27 November 2019; 3 (6): 731–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190109
Download citation file: