Optical biosensors represent the most common type of biosensor. Here we provide a brief classification, a description of underlying principles of operation and their bioanalytical applications. The main focus is placed on the most widely used optical biosensors which are surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based biosensors including SPR imaging and localized SPR. In addition, other optical biosensor systems are described, such as evanescent wave fluorescence and bioluminescent optical fibre biosensors, as well as interferometric, ellipsometric and reflectometric interference spectroscopy and surface-enhanced Raman scattering biosensors. The optical biosensors discussed here allow the sensitive and selective detection of a wide range of analytes including viruses, toxins, drugs, antibodies, tumour biomarkers and tumour cells.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2016
Issue Editors
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
Schematic representation of the Affimer® protein. Affimer® molecules are small single domain proteins, engineered to be an alternative to antibodies. Image kindly supplied by Paul Ko Ferrigno. For more information see pages 19-25. - PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board
Review Article|
June 30 2016
Optical biosensors
Pavel Damborský;
Pavel Damborský
1Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 38 Bratislava, Slovakia
Search for other works by this author on:
Juraj Švitel;
Juraj Švitel
2Institute of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinskeho 9, 81237 Bratislava, Slovakia
Search for other works by this author on:
Jaroslav Katrlík
1Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 845 38 Bratislava, Slovakia
Correspondence: Jaroslav Katrlík (chemjkat@savba.sk)
Search for other works by this author on:
Essays Biochem (2016) 60 (1): 91–100.
Citation
Pedro Estrela, Pavel Damborský, Juraj Švitel, Jaroslav Katrlík; Optical biosensors. Essays Biochem 30 June 2016; 60 (1): 91–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20150010
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign in to your personal account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.