Inline low-energy electron holography (LEEH) in conjunction with sample preparation by electrospray ion beam deposition (ES-IBD) has recently emerged as a promising method for the sub-nanometre-scale single-molecule imaging of biomolecules. The single-molecule nature of the LEEH measurement allows for the mapping of the molecules’ conformational space and thus for the imaging of structurally variable biomolecules, thereby providing valuable complementary information to well-established biomolecular structure determination methods. Here, after briefly tracing the development of inline LEEH in bioimaging, we present the state-of-the-art of native ES-IBD + LEEH as a method of single-protein imaging, discuss its applications, specifically regarding the imaging of structurally flexible protein systems and the amplitude and phase information encoded in a low-energy electron hologram, and provide an outlook regarding the considerable possibilities for the future advancement of the approach.

The imaging of biomolecules is of great importance for understanding biological systems as a biomolecule’s structural features are intricately related to its function [1–5]. At present, the leading methods employed for structure determination of biomolecules are X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) [6–10], which provide high-resolution molecular models by averaging over data acquired from a large number of molecules in purified and enriched samples. The near exponential growth of available protein structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) bears witness to the success of these techniques. The need for averaging, however, imposes limitations on the types of molecules that can be imaged as well as on the sample preparation process [11,12]. In particular, averaging impedes the imaging of molecules with a high degree of conformational variability, since structural diversity on the level of individual molecules cannot be adequately represented in an image derived from an ensemble. To overcome these limitations and further advance the reach of biomolecular imaging, different approaches are currently being explored. One potentially universal solution would be the high-resolution imaging of individual molecules, revealing unaveraged molecular structures and thereby mapping the conformation space of the molecule. Such true single-molecule imaging methods include scanning probe microscopy (SPM), and coherent diffraction imaging using an X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) [13–18]. An emerging, potentially high-resolution imaging method for individual molecules is low-energy electron holography (LEEH) [19–32]. Even before the breakthrough experiments in molecular structure determination were carried out in the early 1950s for both DNA and proteins [33–36], Dennis Gabor proposed an electron microscopy approach in which the superposition of a wave scattered from an object and an unscattered reference wave forms an interference pattern (the hologram), which encodes the object’s structural information [37]. His ‘new microscopic principle’ [37], which became known as holography, would be implemented in the form of a lens-less microscope and thus overcome the resolution limit imposed by the aberrations in the electron lenses that were hampering the widespread application of electron microscopes at the time. Additionally, the method would give access to the relative phase information between scattered wave and reference wave, which would allow for the reconstruction of an image from a single object instead of a periodic crystal [37–39], thus making it a promising candidate for single-molecule imaging.

Holographic imaging can be realised with any kind of coherent radiation in different imaging geometries: inline [19–32,37,38,40] and off-axis [40–44], depending on the availability of suitable optical elements for the type of radiation employed. However, biomolecular imaging on the single-molecule scale requires high contrast. To achieve this, high scattering cross-sections are necessary, which occur at low electron energies in the range of 100 eV [45,46]. While there have been demonstrations of the imaging of biological samples using high-energy electron holography implementations in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [47,48], the imaged structures are in general on a larger spatial scale. As the present paper focuses on holographic imaging of individual biomolecules on the nanometre and sub-nanometre level, a detailed discussion of high-energy electron holography implementations is beyond the scope of this article, for an overview of the topic we refer the reader to [43,47,49,50].

The application of low-energy electron holographic imaging to individual biomolecules first became feasible in the wake of the development of highly coherent low-energy electron sources in the form of ultrasharp tips [19,20,51]. While this enabled the experimental acquisition of low-energy electron holograms of biological samples suspended over a holey substrate [25,26,28,52–56], the discovery of graphene [57] significantly expanded the applicability of the method as it provided a continuous sample support that facilitates the use of low-energy electrons in transmission [58,59], can be prepared in an ultraclean way [60], and creates a well-defined reference wave. This not only allows the imaging of smaller objects but also simplifies hologram reconstruction, i.e. the retrieval of real-space images of the objects. Finally, combining LEEH with a highly controlled sample preparation performed by electrospray ion beam deposition (ES-IBD) [61] recently allowed the sub-nanometre-resolution imaging of native proteins at the single-molecule level [31,32].

Here, we review the development and application of inline LEEH for the single-molecule scale imaging of biological molecules. We first present the principles of holography and discuss the implementation of a LEEH microscope in conjunction with ES-IBD as the sample preparation method. Subsequently, we summarise its application as a single-molecule imaging method for biomolecules, demonstrating that LEEH can map the conformational space of flexible proteins, and thus, for samples prepared by ES-IBD, provide information about the molecules’ gas-phase structure. Additionally, we report that the application of phase reconstruction algorithms allows for the retrieval of further structural details that can be traced to local changes in the mean inner potential of the molecules as well as to the presence of local electric fields. Following this, we provide an outlook regarding the future development of the technique.

Although LEEH has only recently been established as a tool for single-molecule imaging of biomolecules [29,31,32], the underlying idea of holographic imaging has been proposed by Gabor in 1948 [37]. Given that such an imaging scheme can be realised without the use of lenses or other optical elements (inline geometry), the obtainable resolution is in principle only diffraction-limited [62,63], i.e. dependent on the wavelength and coherence of the irradiating beam. Since coherent illumination is necessary for creating holograms, the development of the method received a boost with the advent of laser sources, which allowed holography to be widely applied in optical microscopy and related techniques [64–66].

In parallel, holography has also been developed as an electron microscopy technique, mostly in the context of TEM applications in materials science [43,67,68]. Nowadays, aberration-free lenses are available not only in photon optics but also in high-energy electron imaging [69]; hence for these applications, a holographic approach is not needed to achieve Gabor’s original goal of aberration-free imaging. Nevertheless, the holographic method is very well suited for quantitative phase imaging, as demonstrated in a wide variety of implementations ranging from holographic imaging in TEM [42,44,70] to X-ray holography applications [71,72] in inline [71,72], off-axis [42,44,70], and Fourier transform holography [73] geometries, and is thus of interest for many applications, such as the imaging of biological systems or the mapping of electromagnetic fields. This success of holographic phase imaging also indicates that method development for LEEH can profit from focusing on single-molecule level phase reconstruction.

Since the single-molecule level imaging of biomolecules requires high contrast and thus the use of low-energy electrons, the lack of aberration-free electron lenses for this energy range [74] necessitates the implementation of LEEH in Gabor’s original lens-less inline imaging geometry. An inline LEEH setup (Figure 1A), as originally designed by Fink et al. [19], consists of three main parts: a coherent electron source, the sample to be imaged, and a detector to record the hologram. A divergent beam of coherent electrons in an energy range of 30–200 eV (corresponding to wavelengths of 2.23–0.87 Å, which, depending on the numerical aperture of the setup, yields a theoretical resolution limit (Abbe diffraction limit [62,63]) of approximately 1–3 Å) is produced by field emission from sharp tungsten tips [19,20,75,76], forming the incident reference wave ΨR that subsequently interacts with the object. This interaction results in the scattered wave ΨO. In the area between sample and detector, the two waves interfere, creating the superposition U = ΨR + ΨO, which is recorded at the detector as the hologram H =|ΨR + ΨO|2 [37,38]. The amplitude information stored in the hologram can be retrieved by a numerical reconstruction process based on wave field propagation, in which the exit wave U(x,y) created by the interaction in the object plane is obtained as the solution of a Fresnel–Kirchhoff integral [62,77] (eqn 1):
U(x,y)=-iλ--H(X,Y)ΨR(X,Y)e-ikρρdXdY,
(1)

with ρ=(X-x)2+(Y-y)2+(Z-z)2. (x,y,z) denote the co-ordinates in the object plane, while (X,Y,Z) are the co-ordinates in the detector plane. Due to the divergence of the beam, the ratio between z and Z determines the achievable geometric magnification of the inline holography setup (see Figure 1A).

Experimental methods

Figure 1
Experimental methods

(A) Schematic of the inline LEEH experimental setup, consisting of an electron source, proteins deposited on a free-standing single-layer graphene (SLG) substrate (object) and a detector to record the hologram. The hologram (H) is created as the interference pattern between the wave scattered by the object (ΨO) and the incident reference wave (ΨR) and is subsequently numerically reconstructed to obtain real-space amplitude and phase images. The magnification is determined by the ratio of z and Z. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [120]. (B) Sketch of the native ES-IBD sample preparation process, during which the molecules proceed from solution through the gas phase to soft-landing deposition. Depending on their folding state, the molecules assume different charge states (labelled +y and +z). Before deposition, the relevant species is selected by mass spectrometry.

Figure 1
Experimental methods

(A) Schematic of the inline LEEH experimental setup, consisting of an electron source, proteins deposited on a free-standing single-layer graphene (SLG) substrate (object) and a detector to record the hologram. The hologram (H) is created as the interference pattern between the wave scattered by the object (ΨO) and the incident reference wave (ΨR) and is subsequently numerically reconstructed to obtain real-space amplitude and phase images. The magnification is determined by the ratio of z and Z. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [120]. (B) Sketch of the native ES-IBD sample preparation process, during which the molecules proceed from solution through the gas phase to soft-landing deposition. Depending on their folding state, the molecules assume different charge states (labelled +y and +z). Before deposition, the relevant species is selected by mass spectrometry.

Close modal

While the use of low-energy electrons has the potential for nondestructive imaging of fragile biomolecules [29,31,78], it also imposes strict requirements on the sample preparation. Because of the small mean free path of low-energy electrons [45,46], substrates and matrices employed in traditional TEM and cryo-EM experiments cannot be used [30]. The development of a reliable procedure for sample preparation, i.e. the identification of a low-energy electron-transparent substrate and controlled molecular deposition methods, has been a critical step in the development of LEEH as an imaging method for biomolecules. Initial LEEH experiments were carried out on free-standing fibres spanned over the holes of a perforated conductive foil [19,22,24–26,28,52–55], i.e. without the presence of a substrate (Figure 2A). Employing this sample-preparation technique, the first LEEH experiments on biological samples, ranging from purple membrane [52] to DNA fibers [25], were reported in the 1990s. Despite this initial success, LEEH imaging was still limited to few specific biological objects and molecular structures that could be stretched over empty holes [25,26,28,54–56,79]. Additionally, the use of free-standing fibres induces biprism distortions that, in LEEH, negatively impact the reconstruction process and the resolution of the reconstructed image [26,80–82].

Development of LEEH imaging of biomolecules

Figure 2
Development of LEEH imaging of biomolecules

(A) Left to right: Sketch of a free-standing DNA strand stretched over a holey substrate, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of single-stranded DNA. Hologram and amplitude reconstruction images adapted from Latychevskaia et al., used under CC BY 4.0 [56]. (B) Left to right: Schematic of tobacco mosaic virions stretched over a SLG-covered holey grid, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of a tobacco mosaic virion. Tobacco mosaic virions have been deposited on SLG via a dropcast procedure [29]. The use of SLG as a substrate reduces charging and thus artefacts in the reconstruction. Hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model adapted from Longchamp et al., with the permission of AIP Publishing [29]. (C) Left to right: Sketch of a cytochrome C molecule deposited on a SLG-covered holey grid by ES-IBD, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of a cytochrome C molecule. The SLG substrate allows the imaging of smaller molecules that do not stretch over a membrane, while sample preparation by ES-IBD provides a clean and controlled method for protein sample preparation in a native-like state on surfaces in UHV. Hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model adapted from Longchamp et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [31].

Figure 2
Development of LEEH imaging of biomolecules

(A) Left to right: Sketch of a free-standing DNA strand stretched over a holey substrate, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of single-stranded DNA. Hologram and amplitude reconstruction images adapted from Latychevskaia et al., used under CC BY 4.0 [56]. (B) Left to right: Schematic of tobacco mosaic virions stretched over a SLG-covered holey grid, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of a tobacco mosaic virion. Tobacco mosaic virions have been deposited on SLG via a dropcast procedure [29]. The use of SLG as a substrate reduces charging and thus artefacts in the reconstruction. Hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model adapted from Longchamp et al., with the permission of AIP Publishing [29]. (C) Left to right: Sketch of a cytochrome C molecule deposited on a SLG-covered holey grid by ES-IBD, LEEH hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model of a cytochrome C molecule. The SLG substrate allows the imaging of smaller molecules that do not stretch over a membrane, while sample preparation by ES-IBD provides a clean and controlled method for protein sample preparation in a native-like state on surfaces in UHV. Hologram, amplitude reconstruction, and model adapted from Longchamp et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [31].

Close modal

The introduction of a SLG substrate, which exhibits high transmittance for electrons in the energy range employed in LEEH [30,58,59,83–86], as support for the target objects [58,59] vastly extended the possibilities offered by the LEEH method [29,83] (Figure 2B). The graphene layer provides a uniform equipotential plane, which effectively reduces the undesired biprism effect and artefact-inducing charging effects, thereby creating an undisturbed reference wave. The excellent conductivity of graphene [87] and the fact that electronic states of proteins and graphene show a significant overlap [88] likely are conducive to protecting the molecules from radiation damage caused by ejection of electrons from the proteins, which can swiftly be replaced from the graphene. Additionally, SLG has the advantage of only weakly interacting with biomolecules, which facilitates the preservation of biologically relevant states of the sample.

With graphene being established as a suitable substrate, LEEH single-molecule imaging additionally requires a clean, highly controlled, and ultrahigh vacuum (UHV)-compatible method for depositing fragile biomolecules on the substrate. Native ES-IBD combines all these features and thus is the natural choice of sample-preparation technique for the LEEH imaging of biomolecules. The method is particularly suitable in this context since it can not only transfer complex biomolecules such as proteins onto surfaces in UHV while retaining a native-like state but can, in combination with preparative mass spectrometry, selectively deposit the relevant molecular species (Figure 1B) [89–92] and control the coverage, ensuring a sparse sample that allows for a well-defined reference wave.

The combination of LEEH imaging with ES-IBD-prepared samples forms a potent tool capable of providing access to a diverse range of molecules on the single-molecule scale [31,32] (Figure 2C). To illustrate this, Figure 3 provides an overview of proteins imaged by LEEH after mass-selective deposition by ES-IBD, ranging from small proteins with molecular masses of 10–20 kDa (cytochrome C (12 kDa, Figure 2C [31]), Myoglobin (17 kDa, Figure 3A)) to large proteins with molecular masses of several hundreds of kDa (β-Galactosidase, 465 kDa (Figure 3D)). In all cases, the reconstructed amplitude images match the molecular models in size and shape. In the case of the larger molecules, in particular in the β-galactosidase molecule in Figure 3D, additional substructure is revealed.

Overview of protein systems imaged by LEEH: amplitude reconstruction of individual molecules with corresponding model

Figure 3
Overview of protein systems imaged by LEEH: amplitude reconstruction of individual molecules with corresponding model

(A) Myoglobin [93]. (B) Hemoglobin [94]. (C) Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) [95]. (D) β-Galactosidase [96]. All proteins were deposited on SLG by native ES-IBD.

Figure 3
Overview of protein systems imaged by LEEH: amplitude reconstruction of individual molecules with corresponding model

(A) Myoglobin [93]. (B) Hemoglobin [94]. (C) Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) [95]. (D) β-Galactosidase [96]. All proteins were deposited on SLG by native ES-IBD.

Close modal

In principle, the LEEH imaging of structures both larger and smaller than shown in Figure 3 is possible. In the case of large molecular systems, the limitations will most likely be defined by the ability of low-energy electrons to penetrate the structures as well as by the ratio of object size and the illuminated area, which has to remain in the range of 1% to ensure artefact-free imaging [38,97,98]. The imaging of smaller structures is mainly limited by the current resolution of the technique (approximately 5 Å [32]), which could in principle be enhanced by improving the performance of LEEH imaging, for instance via an increased coherence of the electron emitters [99] or via measurements at cryogenic temperatures [100].

In the light of these results, the combination of ES-IBD and LEEH opens up the possibility of imaging a large range of protein systems at the single-molecule level. Additionally, the method could be extended to the imaging of other classes of biomolecules such as DNA-based structures, or to glycans, which, due to their high degree of conformational variability, pose a particular challenge to averaging-based methods.

Since single-molecule methods are capable of probing the full conformational space of a molecular system in a given imaging environment, such techniques are of particular interest in the investigation of systems with a high degree of conformational variability [101,102]. The ability of LEEH amplitude imaging to map different conformations has recently been demonstrated in an ES-IBD+LEEH study of IgG antibodies (IgGs) [32], which consist of three subunits connected by a highly flexible hinge region. Figure 4 demonstrates the ability of LEEH imaging to distinguish different antibody conformations, both on the level of the overall molecular shape as well as on the subunit level, and thus to map the conformational space accessible to IgG molecules on an SLG surface. The observed structures can be classified into two main species: extended structures with clearly discernible subunits (Figure 4A,B) and compact structures without discernible substructure (Figure 4C).

Imaging conformational variability and gas-phase-related conformations

Figure 4
Imaging conformational variability and gas-phase-related conformations

(A) Amplitude reconstructions of IgG antibody molecules in a flat adsorption geometry, resulting in Y-shaped structures. (B) Amplitude reconstructions of IgG antibody molecules in a vertical adsorption geometry, resulting in two-lobe structures. The diversity in the observed structures demonstrates that LEEH imaging can map the conformational space of conformationally variable molecules. (C) Examples of gas-phase-related, collapsed antibody structures. (D) Percentage of extended and collapsed conformations observed by LEEH imaging depending on the landing energy. At higher landing energies, more extended structures are observed, indicating that the compact structures are related to the collapsed gas-phase conformation from which extended structures can be recovered if sufficient energy is transferred during the landing process. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [32].

Figure 4
Imaging conformational variability and gas-phase-related conformations

(A) Amplitude reconstructions of IgG antibody molecules in a flat adsorption geometry, resulting in Y-shaped structures. (B) Amplitude reconstructions of IgG antibody molecules in a vertical adsorption geometry, resulting in two-lobe structures. The diversity in the observed structures demonstrates that LEEH imaging can map the conformational space of conformationally variable molecules. (C) Examples of gas-phase-related, collapsed antibody structures. (D) Percentage of extended and collapsed conformations observed by LEEH imaging depending on the landing energy. At higher landing energies, more extended structures are observed, indicating that the compact structures are related to the collapsed gas-phase conformation from which extended structures can be recovered if sufficient energy is transferred during the landing process. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [32].

Close modal

The class of extended molecules represented in Figure 4A,B can be further subdivided into molecules with three distinguishable subunits (Y-shaped conformation, Figure 4A) and with two distinguishable subunits (Figure 4B). As shown in the sketches in Figure 4A,B, this distinction can be traced to the adsorption geometry of the molecules with respect to the SLG surface: while the Y-shaped molecules lie flat on the graphene substrate, the two-lobe species can be associated with molecules adsorbed in a vertical geometry. Since LEEH imaging yields 2D projections along the optical axis, the resulting molecular images exhibit shapes with three and two discernible subunits, respectively [32].

The conformational variability of the imaged IgGs is, however, not only visible in the overall molecular shape determined by the adsorption geometry, since the molecules in each subclass, while clearly recognizable as the same conformational species, can differ significantly (Figure 4A,B). This diversity directly traces the molecules’ conformational space since the observed extended conformations can be mapped to the IgG crystallographic structure [103] by a simple rotation of four bonds of the hinge region [32] (insets of Figure 4A,B).

The observed compact structures (Figure 4C), on the other hand, do not match any of the projections obtained from antibodies with an extended hinge region in either of the adsorption geometries discussed in Figure 4A,B. The origin of these compact surface conformations is directly related to the influence of the ES-IBD sample preparation on the protein conformation, which could be altered during several steps within this process. The transitional steps, in which the protein’s environment changes, are particularly likely to induce conformational changes. The final desolvation step when transitioning from the solution phase into the gas phase, which directly affects the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions within the molecule [104], marks the most drastic change of environment during the ES-IBD process. While mass spectrometry and ion mobility measurements show that IgG antibodies do not unfold or fragment upon transition into the gas phase [105–107], experimentally obtained IgG antibody collision cross-sections are up to 30% smaller than the theoretical values calculated from the crystallographic model [107]. This indicates that flexible proteins such as antibodies can undergo a collapse of the tertiary structure during desolvation [107–111] as also shown by molecular dynamics simulations, which yield collapsed, compact gas-phase structures of IgG antibodies [107] with dimensions matching those of the experimentally observed compact structures. The compact conformations observed by LEEH imaging on ES-IBD-prepared samples are thus interpreted as intact antibodies that have retained their collapsed gas-phase conformation upon deposition on the SLG surface.

Since both ion mobility-based collisional cross-section measurements and molecular dynamics simulations [107] indicate that IgGs assume compact, collapsed gas-phase conformations, the observation of extended IgG structures in LEEH measurements is thus related to the landing process of the molecules on the SLG surface, which is in general associated with an energy transfer from translational kinetic energy into vibrational modes of both the molecule and the graphene substrate [88,112–114]. In order to observe extended antibody conformations on the surface, the energy transfer during the landing process has to allow for the re-extension of the hinge region and thus the recovery of extended conformations from collapsed structures. In general, for landing energies below the reactive regime, an increase in landing energy is correlated with an increase in extended surface conformations [113]. By tuning the landing energy in a range from 0.5 to 25 eV per charge, an increase in the percentage of extended antibody conformations on the surface from 11 ± 2% at 0.5 eV per charge to 33 ± 3.5% at 25 eV per charge (Figure 4D) was observed [32]. This energy dependence further supports the interpretation that the observed compact structures are directly related to the molecules’ gas-phase structure while the extended structures are recovered during the landing process in conditions of favourable orientation and sufficient energy transfer. The possibility to distinguish and, via the tuning of the landing energy, select between extended conformations and compact gas-phase-related conformations allows the study of both conformational spaces by ES-IBD+LEEH. The technique can thus be relevant for exploring questions pertaining to both the native structure of conformationally variable proteins as well as to conformational changes occurring in the gas phase. The imaging of the latter could be of particular interest in the context of structural biology measurements performed in the gas phase.

While the exploration of the conformational space of proteins, which relies on the accurate reconstruction of the molecules’ shape and size, can be carried out using a one-step amplitude reconstruction routine [31,32,77], biological matter interacting with low-energy electrons in general does not only induce changes in the amplitude of the incident electron beam but also in its phase [45,46,115]. However, in LEEH, the phase information cannot be accurately reconstructed by a one-step reconstruction process due to the fact that the hologram itself is a real-valued intensity distribution, which only encodes relative phase information, but does not contain the absolute phase values of the complex wave field in the detector plane [116–118]. This results in an ambiguity in the one-step reconstruction by wave field propagation, which leads to the simultaneous reconstruction of the image and its complex conjugate (the twin image) [38,119]. Via out-of-focus contributions, the latter induces inaccuracies in the phase reconstruction, which can be suppressed by employing an iterative phase retrieval scheme as has been shown for simulated inline holograms [119] and been applied in the experimental phase reconstruction of charged impurities on graphene [84].

In high-energy electron imaging, the phase shift induced by the sample can directly be related to its mean inner potential, i.e. the spatially averaged electrostatic potential defined as Vmean=1ΩΩV(r)d3r, where V(r) is the electric potential of the object in a given volume Ω [43,46]. For an object consisting of atoms of similar electrostatic properties and scattering strength, this implies a relation between the induced phase shift and the object’s thickness or atomic density. Phase imaging has only recently been reported in the context of experimentally acquired inline low-energy electron holograms of biological specimens [120]. The technique hence continues to be developed and some features of the resulting phase maps remain to be further explored on a quantitative level. Similarly to the high-energy case, the LEEH phase imaging results indicate a strong correlation between the experimentally measured induced phase shift and the projected atomic density of individual protein molecules [120]. Given that proteins mainly consist of atoms of very similar scattering strengths, this observed correlation in turn implies that the mean inner potential of the molecules is a major contribution to the phase shift measured by LEEH imaging.

The correlation between induced phase shift and projected atomic density can most clearly be observed when reconstructing holograms of two objects with varying molecular thickness as displayed in Figure 5A, which shows the iterative amplitude and phase reconstructions (centre) along with the corresponding projected atomic density (right) of two β-galactosidase molecules in different orientations with respect to the surface. As shown in the schematic of the molecular orientations in Figure 5A, the molecule on the left (blue) is in a flat orientation with respect to the graphene surface, while the molecule on the right (green) is in an upright orientation, resulting in a difference in molecular thickness along the optical axis and thus in a difference in projected atomic density. The changes in the projected atomic density are reproduced by the measured phase shift, which is much lower in the flat molecule on the left than in the upright molecule on the right. A coarse theoretical estimate of the phase shift induced by a large protein such as β-galactosidase, obtained by summing the phase shifts calculated for individual light atoms (C, N, O) via a partial wave-based calculation [121] according to the amount of atoms in the electron path, yields a quantitative agreement with the measured phase shifts: the calculation yields a phase shift of approximately 0.05 rad per atom [98], corresponding to 0.5–1.5 rad for a molecule in flat orientation (projected atomic density 10–30 atoms per pixel) and 2–4 rad for a molecule in upright orientation (projected atomic density 40–80 atoms per pixel) [120]. This implies that LEEH phase imaging can be used to map projected atomic density and thereby local changes in the mean inner potential of biomolecules. For a full interpretation of the LEEH phase maps, however, further research needs to be carried out since a full description of the interaction of low-energy electrons with biological matter is currently not computationally feasible. Specifically, the simultaneous presence of positive and negative phase shifts, which in some examples persists even after phase unwrapping [120], remains to be explored further.

LEEH phase imaging

Figure 5
LEEH phase imaging

(A) Left: Schematic depiction of the orientation of two β-galactosidase molecules, whose amplitude and phase reconstruction is shown in the central panels, with respect to the SLG surface. The different orientations of the molecule result in different molecular thicknesses along the optical axis. Centre: Amplitude and phase reconstruction of a hologram of two β-galactosidase molecules in orientations as depicted on the left. Right: Projected atomic density obtained from PDB models of β-galactosidase (PDB: 6CVM [96]) in the corresponding orientations. The colour scale maps the number of atoms projected into each pixel. The difference in projected atomic density between the two molecules is reflected by the difference in induced phase shift. (B) Phase reconstruction of two β-galactosidase molecules in similar orientations with (left, dark blue frame) and without (right, light blue frame) a localised charge in the vicinity of the molecule. The signal from the localised charge dominates the reconstructed phase map. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [120].

Figure 5
LEEH phase imaging

(A) Left: Schematic depiction of the orientation of two β-galactosidase molecules, whose amplitude and phase reconstruction is shown in the central panels, with respect to the SLG surface. The different orientations of the molecule result in different molecular thicknesses along the optical axis. Centre: Amplitude and phase reconstruction of a hologram of two β-galactosidase molecules in orientations as depicted on the left. Right: Projected atomic density obtained from PDB models of β-galactosidase (PDB: 6CVM [96]) in the corresponding orientations. The colour scale maps the number of atoms projected into each pixel. The difference in projected atomic density between the two molecules is reflected by the difference in induced phase shift. (B) Phase reconstruction of two β-galactosidase molecules in similar orientations with (left, dark blue frame) and without (right, light blue frame) a localised charge in the vicinity of the molecule. The signal from the localised charge dominates the reconstructed phase map. Figure adapted from Ochner et al., used under CC BY-NC-ND [120].

Close modal

The sensitivity of LEEH phase to changes in electrostatic potential is further confirmed by the strong phase signatures produced by the electric fields of localised charges on or close to the imaged molecules. Figure 5B shows a comparison of two β-galactosidase molecules in similar orientations. While the molecule on the right, which is not in the proximity of a localised charge, displays a uniform phase shift, the phase reconstruction of the molecule on the left is dominated by a localised feature, which can be associated with a negatively charged feature on the graphene substrate with an estimated charge of 4–5 electron charges [83,120]. This shows that an accumulation of charge strongly affects the LEEH phase reconstruction, which could give an indication of the conditions under which phase shifts of opposite signs may occur in the same image, namely when phase shifts can be attributed to charges of opposite sign or to different origins such as a charge distribution and the mean inner potential of a molecule [120].

In summary, the mapping of changes in mean inner potential by LEEH phase imaging could in future be used to extract chemical information about the imaged objects by mapping changes in scattering strength encoded by variations in the mean inner potential. Additionally, the exploration of charge distributions could be of particular interest in the context of ES-IBD sample preparation, for example to answer questions regarding whether the charge present in the gas phase is retained upon landing on the surface.

In the last 5 years, ES-IBD+LEEH has emerged as a promising single-molecule imaging technique, capable of revealing the shape of individual proteins at sub-nanometre resolution. At its present performance, it can provide complementary information to the well-established ensemble averaging methods, for example regarding conformational variability. However, many fundamental questions remain to be addressed, both on the experimental and on the theoretical levels. Instrumentation will have to be further developed to increase the obtainable resolution, for example via measurements at cryogenic temperatures, which are conducive to increased emitter stability, enhanced coherence [99], and a reduced energy spread of the electron beam [100]. Further improvements might include better detectors and an optimisation of the emitter-preparation process. In addition, the development of advanced reconstruction algorithms, which can provide a deeper understanding of LEEH phase maps as well as extract the three-dimensional information contained in the hologram, thereby allowing for three-dimensional imaging on the single-molecule scale, is of the utmost importance. Finally, the potential of preparative mass spectrometry techniques in LEEH sample preparation needs to be further explored. An increased understanding and control over the gas-phase conformations is needed to ensure the retention of native protein conformations during the sample-preparation process. The use of ion mobility filtering during the sample-preparation process would allow for a higher selectivity in the deposited conformations and thus enable correlated measurements of gas-phase conformations both by a collisional cross-section analysis and by direct LEEH imaging.

  • LEEH in conjunction with sample preparation performed by ES-IBD can be employed as a tool for imaging biomolecules at the single-molecule level at sub-nanometre resolution.

  • LEEH imaging can map the conformational space of molecules with a high degree of conformational variability and thus provide insights both into the molecules’ native structure and their gas-phase structure.

  • Phase retrieval methods can elucidate further structural detail related to the molecules’ mean inner potential as well as the presence of localised electric fields.

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

cryo-EM

electron cryo-microscopy

ES-IBD

electrospray ion beam deposition

LEEH

low-energy electron holography

PDB

protein data bank

SLG

single-layer graphene

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

UHV

ultrahigh vacuum

1.
Kumar
S.
,
Ma
B.
,
Tsai
C.-J.
,
Wolfson
H.
and
Nussinov
R.
(
1999
)
Folding funnels and conformational transitions via hinge-bending motions
.
Cell Biochem. Biophys.
31
,
141
164
[PubMed]
2.
Keskin
O.
(
2007
)
Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations: a case study of antibodies
.
BMC Struct. Biol.
7
,
31
[PubMed]
3.
Dobbins
S.E.
,
Lesk
V.I.
and
Sternberg
M.J.
(
2008
)
Insights into protein flexibility: the relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking
.
PNAS
105
,
10390
10395
[PubMed]
4.
Huber
R.
and
Bennett
W.S.
(
1983
)
Functional significance of flexibility in proteins
.
Biopolymers
22
,
261
279
[PubMed]
5.
Schneider
S.W.
,
Nuschele
S.
,
Wixforth
A.
,
Gorzelanny
C.
,
Alexander-Katz
A.
,
Netz
R.R.
et al.
(
2007
)
Shear-induced unfolding triggers adhesion of von Willebrand factor fibers
.
PNAS
104
,
7899
7903
[PubMed]
6.
Nakane
T.
,
Kotecha
A.
,
Sente
A.
,
McMullan
G.
,
Masiulis
S.
,
Brown
P.M.G.E.
et al.
(
2020
)
Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution
.
Nature
587
,
152
156
[PubMed]
7.
Jonic
S.
and
Vénien-Bryan
C.
(
2009
)
Protein structure determination by electron cryo-microscopy
.
Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.
9
,
636
642
[PubMed]
8.
Frank
J.
(
2009
)
Single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules in electron microscopy - 30 years
.
Q. Rev. Biophys.
42
,
139
158
[PubMed]
9.
Bartesaghi
A.
,
Merk
A.
,
Banerjee
S.
,
Matthies
D.
,
Wu
X.
,
Milne
J.L.S.
et al.
(
2015
)
2.2 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase in complex with a cell-permeant inhibitor
.
Science
348
,
1147
1151
[PubMed]
10.
Higgins
M.K.
and
Lea
S.M.
(
2017
)
On the state of crystallography at the dawn of the electron microscopy revolution
.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
46
,
95
101
[PubMed]
11.
Cianfrocco
M.A.
and
Kellogg
E.H.
(
2020
)
What could go wrong? A practical guide to single-particle cryo-EM: from biochemistry to atomic models
J. Chem. Inf. Model.
60
,
2458
2469
[PubMed]
12.
Glaeser
R.M.
(
2016
)
How good can cryo-EM become?
Nat. Methods
13
,
28
32
[PubMed]
13.
Rose
M.
,
Bobkov
S.
,
Ayyer
K.
,
Kurta
R.P.
,
Dzhigaev
D.
,
Kim
Y.Y.
et al.
(
2018
)
Single-particle imaging without symmetry constraints at an X-ray free-electron laser
.
IUCrJ
5
,
727
736
[PubMed]
14.
Kurta
R.P.
,
Donatelli
J.J.
,
Yoon
C.H.
,
Berntsen
P.
,
Bielecki
J.
,
Daurer
B.J.
et al.
(
2017
)
Correlations in scattered X-ray laser pulses reveal nanoscale structural features of viruses
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
119
,
158102
[PubMed]
15.
Ayyer
K.
,
Geloni
G.
,
Kocharyan
V.
,
Saldin
E.
,
Serkez
S.
,
Yefanov
O.
et al.
(
2015
)
Perspectives for imaging single protein molecules with the present design of the European XFEL
.
Struct. Dynamics
2
,
041702
16.
Wu
X.
,
Delbianco
M.
,
Anggara
K.
,
Michnowicz
T.
,
Pardo-Vargas
A.
,
Bharate
P.
et al.
(
2020
)
Imaging single glycans
.
Nature
582
,
375
378
[PubMed]
17.
Deng
Z.
,
Thontasen
N.
,
Malinowski
N.
,
Rinke
G.
,
Harnau
L.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
et al.
(
2012
)
A close look at proteins: Submolecular resolution of two- and three-dimensionally folded cytochrome C at surfaces
.
Nano Lett.
12
,
2452
2458
[PubMed]
18.
Rauschenbach
S.
,
Rinke
G.
,
Gutzler
R.
,
Abb
S.
,
Albarghash
A.
,
Le
D.
et al.
(
2017
)
Two-dimensional folding of polypeptides into molecular nanostructures at surfaces
.
ACS Nano
11
,
2420
2427
[PubMed]
19.
Fink
H.-W.
,
Stocker
W.
and
Schmid
H.
(
1990
)
Holography with low-energy electrons
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
65
,
1204
1206
[PubMed]
20.
Fink
H.-W.
,
Stocker
W.
and
Schmid
H.
(
1990
)
Coherent point source electron beams
.
J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. B
8
,
1323
21.
Kreuzer
H.J.
,
Nakamura
K.
,
Wierzbicki
A.
,
Fink
H.-W.
and
Schmid
H.
(
1992
)
Theory of the point source electron microscope
.
Ultramicroscopy
45
,
381
403
22.
Morin
R.
and
Gargani
A.
(
1993
)
Ultra-low-energy-electron projection holograms
.
Phys. Rev. B.
48
,
6643
6645
23.
Spence
J.C.H.
,
Qian
W.
and
Melmed
A.J.
(
1993
)
Experimental low-voltage point-projection microscopy and its possibilities
.
Ultramicroscopy
52
,
473
477
24.
Binh
V.T.
,
Semet
V.
and
Garcia
N.
(
1995
)
Nanometric observations at low energy by Fresnel projection microscopy: carbon and polymer fibres
.
Ultramicroscopy
58
,
307
317
25.
Fink
H.-W.
,
Schmid
H.
,
Ermantraut
E.
and
Schulz
T.
(
1997
)
Electron holography of individual DNA molecules
.
J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A
14
,
2168
2172
26.
Weierstall
U.
,
Spence
J.C.H.
,
Stevens
M.
and
Downing
K.H.
(
1999
)
Point-projection electron imaging of tobacco mosaic virus at 40 eV electron energy
.
Micron
30
,
335
338
27.
Gölzhäuser
A.
,
Völkel
B.
,
Grunze
M.
and
Kreuzer
H.J.
(
2002
)
Optimization of the low energy electron point source microscope: imaging of macromolecules
.
Micron
33
,
241
255
[PubMed]
28.
Eisele
A.
,
Völkel
B.
,
Grunze
M.
and
Gölzhäuser
A.
(
2008
)
Nanometer resolution holography with the low energy electron point source microscope
.
Z. Phys. Chem.
222
,
779
787
29.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2015
)
Low-energy electron holographic imaging of individual tobacco mosaic virions
.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
,
133101
30.
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2015
)
Holography and coherent diffraction with low-energy electrons: a route towards structural biology at the single molecule level
.
Ultramicroscopy
159
,
395
402
[PubMed]
31.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
,
Abb
S.
,
Escher
C.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Kern
K.
et al.
(
2017
)
Imaging proteins at the single-molecule level
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
114
,
1474
1479
32.
Ochner
H.
,
Szilagyi
S.
,
Abb
S.
,
Gault
J.
,
Robinson
C.V.
,
Malavolti
L.
et al.
(
2021
)
Low-energy electron holography imaging of conformational variability of single-antibody molecules from electrospray ion beam deposition
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
118
,
e2112651118
33.
Crick
F.H.C.
and
Watson
J.D.
(
1953
)
Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid
.
Nature
171
,
737
738
[PubMed]
34.
Franklin
R.E.
and
Gosling
R.G.
(
1953
)
Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate
.
Nature
171
,
740
741
[PubMed]
35.
Kendrew
J.C.
,
Bodo
G.
,
Dintzis
H.M.
,
Parrish
R.G.
,
Wyckoff
H.
and
Phillips
D.C.
(
1958
)
A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by X-ray analysis
.
Nature
181
,
662
666
[PubMed]
36.
Kendrew
J.C.
,
Dickerson
R.E.
,
Strandberg
B.E.
,
Hart
R.G.
,
Davies
D.R.
,
Phillips
D.C.
et al.
(
1960
)
Structure of myoglobin: a three-dimensional fourier synthesis at 2 Å resolution
.
Nature
185
,
422
427
[PubMed]
37.
Gabor
D.
(
1948
)
A new microscopic principle
.
Nature
161
,
777
778
[PubMed]
38.
Gabor
D.
(
1949
)
Microscopy by reconstructed wave-fronts
.
Proc. Royal Soc. A
197
,
454
487
39.
Gabor
D.
(
1951
)
Microscopy by reconstructed wave fronts: II
.
Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. B
64
,
449
469
40.
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Formanek
P.
,
Koch
C.T.
and
Lubk
A.
(
2010
)
Off-axis and inline electron holography: experimental comparison
.
Ultramicroscopy
110
,
472
482
41.
Leith
E.N.
and
Upatnieks
J.
(
1962
)
Reconstructed wavefronts and communication theory
.
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
52
,
1123
1130
42.
Dunin-Borkowski
R.E.
,
Kasama
T.
,
Wei
A.
,
Tripp
S.L.
,
Hÿtch
M.J.
,
Snoeck
E.
et al.
(
2004
)
Off-axis electron holography of magnetic nanowires and chains, rings, and planar arrays of magnetic nanoparticles
.
Microsc. Res. Tech.
64
,
390
402
[PubMed]
43.
Lichte
H.
and
Lehmann
M.
(
2008
)
Electron holography - basics and applications
.
Rep. Prog. Phys.
71
,
016102
44.
Weßels
T.
,
Kovács
A.
,
Gliga
S.
,
Finizio
S.
,
Caron
J.
and
Dunin-Borkowski
R.E.
(
2022
)
Quantitative imaging of the magnetic field distribution in an artificial spin ice studied by off-axis electron holography
.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
543
,
168535
45.
Tan
Z.
,
Xia
Y.
,
Zhao
M.
and
Liu
X.
(
2006
)
Electron stopping power and inelastic mean free path in amino acids and protein over the energy range of 20 - 20,000 eV
.
Radiat. Environ. Biophys.
45
,
135
143
[PubMed]
46.
Saldin
D.K.
and
Spence
J.C.H.
(
1994
)
On the mean inner potential in high- and low-energy electron diffraction
.
Ultramicroscopy
55
,
397
406
47.
Simon
P.
,
Lichte
H.
,
Drechsel
J.
,
Formanek
P.
,
Graff
A.
,
Wahl
R.
et al.
(
2003
)
Electron holography of organic and biological materials
.
Adv. Mater.
15
,
1475
1481
48.
Prozorov
T.
,
Almeida
T.P.
,
Kovács
A.
and
Dunin-Borkowski
R.E.
(
2017
)
Off-axis electron holography of bacterial cells and magnetic nanoparticles in liquid
.
J. R. Soc. Interface
14
,
20170464
[PubMed]
49.
Simon
P.
,
Lichte
H.
,
Formanek
P.
,
Lehmann
M.
,
Huhle
R.
,
Carrillo-Cabrera
W.
et al.
(
2008
)
Electron holography of biological samples
.
Micron
39
,
229
256
[PubMed]
50.
Latychevskaia
T.
(
2020
)
Holography and coherent diffraction imaging with low- (30-250 eV) and high- (80-300 keV) energy electrons: history, principles, and recent trends
.
Materials
13
,
3089
[PubMed]
51.
Fink
H.-W.
(
1986
)
Mono-atomic tips for scanning tunneling microscopy
.
IBM J. Res. Dev.
30
,
460
465
52.
Spence
J.C.H.
,
Qian
W.
and
Zhang
X.
(
1994
)
Contrast and radiation damage in point-projection electron imaging of purple membrane at 100 V
.
Ultramicroscopy
55
,
19
23
53.
Spence
J.C.H.
(
1997
)
STEM and shadow-imaging of biomolecules at 6 eV beam energy
.
Micron
28
,
101
116
54.
Stevens
G.B.
,
Krüger
M.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Lindner
P.
,
Plückthun
A.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2011
)
Individual filamentous phage imaged by electron holography
.
Eur. Biophys. J.
40
,
1197
1201
[PubMed]
55.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2012
)
Non-destructive imaging of an individual protein
.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
101
,
093701
56.
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
,
Andregg
W.
,
Andregg
M.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2019
)
Direct visualization of charge transport in suspended (or free-standing) DNA strands by low-energy electron microscopy
.
Sci. Rep.
9
,
8889
[PubMed]
57.
Novoselov
K.S.
,
Geim
A.K.
,
Morozov
S.V.
,
Jiang
D.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Dubonos
S.V.
et al.
(
2004
)
Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films
.
Science
306
,
666
669
[PubMed]
58.
Nair
R.R.
,
Blake
P.
,
Blake
J.R.
,
Zan
R.
,
Anissimova
S.
,
Bangert
U.
et al.
(
2010
)
Graphene as a transparent conductive support for studying biological molecules by transmission electron microscopy
.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
,
153102
59.
Mutus
J.Y.
,
Livadaru
L.
,
Robinson
J.T.
,
Urban
R.
,
Salomons
M.H.
,
Cloutier
M.
et al.
(
2011
)
Low-energy electron point projection microscopy of suspended graphene, the ultimate ‘microscope slide’
.
New J. Phys.
13
,
063011
60.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2013
)
Ultraclean freestanding graphene by platinum-metal catalysis
.
J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. B.
31
,
020605
61.
Rauschenbach
S.
,
Ternes
M.
,
Harnau
L.
and
Kern
K.
(
2016
)
Mass spectrometry as a preparative tool for the surface science of large molecules
.
Ann. Rev. Analytical Chem.
9
,
473
498
62.
Born
M.
and
Wolf
E.
(
1999
)
Principles of Optics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
63.
Latychevskaia
T.
(
2019
)
Lateral and axial resolution criteria in incoherent and coherent optics and holography, near- and far-field regimes
.
Appl. Opt.
58
,
3597
3603
[PubMed]
64.
Marquet
P.
,
Rappaz
B.
,
Magistretti
P.J.
,
Cuche
E.
,
Emery
Y.
,
Colomb
T.
et al.
(
2005
)
Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy
.
Opt. Lett.
30
,
468
470
[PubMed]
65.
Xu
W.
,
Jericho
M.H.
,
Meinertzhagen
I.A.
and
Kreuzer
H.J.
(
2001
)
Digital in-line holography for biological applications
.
PNAS
98
,
11301
11305
[PubMed]
66.
Chapman
H.N.
,
Hau-Riege
S.P.
,
Bogan
M.J.
,
Bajt
S.
,
Barty
A.
,
Boutet
S.
et al.
(
2007
)
Femtosecond time-delay X-ray holography
.
Nature
448
,
676
679
[PubMed]
67.
Midgley
P.A.
and
Dunin-Borkowski
R.E.
(
2009
)
Electron tomography and holography in materials science
.
Nat. Mater.
8
,
271
280
[PubMed]
68.
Lichte
H.
,
Formanek
P.
,
Lenk
A.
,
Linck
M.
,
Matzeck
C.
,
Lehmann
M.
et al.
(
2007
)
Electron holography: applications to materials questions
.
Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
37
,
539
588
69.
Haider
M.
,
Rose
H.
,
Uhlemann
S.
,
Schwan
E.
,
Kabius
B.
and
Urban
K.
(
1998
)
A spherical-aberration-corrected 200 kV transmission electron microscope
.
Ultramicroscopy
75
,
53
60
70.
Kasama
T.
,
Dunin-Borkowski
R.E.
and
Beleggia
M.
(
2011
)
Electron holography of magnetic materials
. In
Holography-Different Fields of Application
(
Ramírez
F.A.M.
, ed.), pp.
53
80
,
IntechOpen
,
London
71.
Krenkel
M.
,
Toepperwien
M.
,
Alves
F.
and
Salditt
T.
(
2017
)
Three-dimensional single-cell imaging with X-ray waveguides in the holographic regime
.
Acta Crystallogr. A: Foundations Adv.
73
,
282
292
72.
Bartels
M.
,
Krenkel
M.
,
Haber
J.
,
Wilke
R.N.
and
Salditt
T.
(
2015
)
X-ray holographic imaging of hydrated biological cells in solution
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
,
048103
[PubMed]
73.
Eisebitt
S.
,
Lüning
J.
,
Schlotter
W.F.
,
Lörgen
M.
,
Hellwig
O.
,
Eberhardt
W.
et al.
(
2004
)
Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by X-ray spectro-holography
.
Nature
432
,
885
888
[PubMed]
74.
Schmidt
T.
,
Marchetto
H.
,
Lévesque
P.L.
,
Groh
U.
,
Maier
F.
,
Preikszas
D.
et al.
(
2010
)
Double aberration correction in a low-energy electron microscope
.
Ultramicroscopy
110
,
1358
1361
[PubMed]
75.
Fowler
R.H.
and
Nordheim
L.W.
(
1928
)
Electron emission in intense electric fields
.
Proc. Royal Soc. A
119
,
173
181
76.
Lin
C.-Y.
,
Chang
W.-T.
,
Hsu
W.-H.
,
Chang
M.-T.
,
Chen
Y.-S.
,
Hwu
E.T.
et al.
(
2018
)
Low-voltage coherent electron microscopy based on a highly coherent electron source built from a nanoemitter
.
J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. B.
36
,
032901
77.
Latychevskaia
T.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2015
)
Practical algorithms for simulation and reconstruction of digital in-line holograms
.
Appl. Opt.
54
,
2424
2434
[PubMed]
78.
Germann
M.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2010
)
Nondestructive imaging of individual biomolecules
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
104
,
095501
[PubMed]
79.
Gölzhäuser
A.
,
Völkel
B.
,
Jäger
B.
,
Zharnikov
M.
,
Kreuzer
H.J.
and
Grunze
M.
(
1998
)
Holographic imaging of macromolecules
.
J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A
16
,
3025
80.
Latychevskaia
T.
(
2014
)
Phase retrieval methods applied to coherent imaging
.
Habilitationsschrift
,
Universitaet Zuerich
81.
Hwang
I.-S.
,
Chang
C.-C.
,
Lu
C.-H.
,
Liu
S.-C.
,
Chang
Y.-C.
,
Lee
T.-K.
et al.
(
2013
)
Investigation of single-walled carbon nanotubes with a low-energy electron point projection microscope
.
New J. Phys.
15
,
043015
82.
Prigent
M.
and
Morin
P.
(
2000
)
Charge effect in point projection images of carbon fibres
.
J. Microsc.
199
,
197
207
[PubMed]
83.
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Wicki
F.
,
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2016
)
Direct observation of individual charges and their dynamics on graphene by low-energy electron holography
.
Nano Lett.
16
,
5469
5474
[PubMed]
84.
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Wicki
F.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2017
)
Imaging the potential distribution of individual charged impurities on graphene by low-energy electron holography
.
Ultramicroscopy
182
,
276
282
[PubMed]
85.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2012
)
Low-energy electron transmission imaging of clusters on free-standing graphene
.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
101
,
113117
86.
Longchamp
J.-N.
,
Latychevskaia
T.
,
Escher
C.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2013
)
Graphene unit cell imaging by holographic coherent diffraction
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
255501
[PubMed]
87.
Geim
A.K.
and
Novoselov
K.S.
(
2007
)
The rise of graphene
.
Nat. Mater.
6
,
183
191
[PubMed]
88.
Anggara
K.
,
Ochner
H.
,
Szilagyi
S.
,
Malavolti
L.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
and
Kern
K.
(
2022
)
Landing proteins on graphene trampoline preserves their gas-phase folding on surface
.
ACS Central Sci.
89.
Urner
L.H.
,
Liko
I.
,
Yen
H.-Y.
,
Hoi
K.-K.
,
Bolla
J.R.
,
Gault
J.
et al.
(
2020
)
Modular detergents tailor the purification and structural analysis of membrane proteins including G-protein coupled receptors
.
Nat. Commun.
11
,
564
[PubMed]
90.
Heck
A.J.R.
(
2008
)
Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology
.
Nat. Methods
5
,
927
933
[PubMed]
91.
Kuhlen
L.
,
Abrusci
P.
,
Johnson
S.
,
Gault
J.
,
Deme
J.
,
Caesar
J.
et al.
(
2018
)
Structure of the core of the type iii secretion system export apparatus
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
25
,
583
590
[PubMed]
92.
Yen
H.-Y.
,
Hopper
J.T.S.
,
Liko
I.
,
Allison
T.M.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Wang
D.
et al.
(
2017
)
Ligand binding to a G protein-coupled receptor captured in a mass spectrometer
.
Sci. Adv.
3
,
e1701016
[PubMed]
93.
Kitahara
M.
,
Fudo
S.
,
Yoneda
T.
,
Nukaga
M.
and
Hoshino
T.
(
2019
)
Anisotropic distribution of ammonium sulfate ions in protein crystallization
.
Cryst. Growth Des.
19
,
6004
6010
94.
Safo
M.K.
and
Abraham
D.J.
(
2001
)
The X-ray structure determination of bovine carbonmonoxy hemoglobin at 2.1 Å resolution and its relationship to the quaternary structures of other hemoglobin crystal forms
.
Protein Sci.
10
,
1091
1099
[PubMed]
95.
Guntupalli
S.R.
,
Li
Z.
,
Chang
L.
,
Plapp
B.V.
and
Subramanian
R.
(
2021
)
Cryo-electron microscopy structures of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase
.
Biochemistry
60
,
663
677
[PubMed]
96.
Bartesaghi
A.
,
Aguerrebere
C.
,
Falconieri
V.
,
Banerjee
S.
,
Earl
L.A.
,
Zhu
X.
et al.
(
2018
)
Atomic resolution cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase
.
Structure
26
,
848
856
[PubMed]
97.
Latychevskaia
T.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2015
)
Reconstruction of purely absorbing, absorbing and phase-shifting, and strong phase-shifting objects from their single-shot inline holograms
.
Appl. Opt.
54
,
3925
3932
98.
Ochner
H.
(
2022
)
Amplitude and phase reconstruction for low-energy electron holography of individual proteins
.
EPFL
Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
99.
Cho
B.
,
Ichimura
T.
,
Shimizu
R.
and
Oshima
C.
(
2004
)
Quantitative evaluation of spatial coherence of the electron beam from low temperature field emitters
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
92
,
246103
[PubMed]
100.
Chang
C.-C.
,
Kuo
H.-S.
,
Hwang
I.-S.
and
Tsong
T.T.
(
2009
)
A fully coherent electron beam from a noble-metal covered W(111) single-atom emitter
.
Nanotechnology
20
,
115401
[PubMed]
101.
Sandin
S.
,
Öfverstedt
L.-G.
,
Wikström
A.-C.
,
Wrange
Ö.
and
Skoglund
U.
(
2004
)
Structure and flexibility of individual immunoglobulin G molecules in solution
.
Structure
12
,
409
415
[PubMed]
102.
Zhang
X.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Tong
H.
,
Peng
B.
,
Rames
M.J.
,
Zhang
S.
et al.
(
2015
)
3D structural fluctuation of IgG1 antibody revealed by individual particle electron tomography
.
Sci. Rep.
5
,
9803
[PubMed]
103.
Harris
L.J.
,
Larson
S.B.
,
Hasel
K.W.
and
McPherson
A.
(
1997
)
Refined structure of an intact IgG2a monoclonal antibody
.
Biochemistry
36
,
1581
1597
[PubMed]
104.
Breuker
K.
and
McLafferty
F.W.
(
2008
)
Stepwise evolution of protein native structure with electrospray into the gas phase, 1012 to 102 s
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
105
,
18145
18152
105.
Parsons
T.B.
,
Struwe
W.B.
,
Gault
J.
,
Yamamoto
K.
,
Taylor
T.A.
,
Raj
R.
et al.
(
2016
)
Optimal synthetic glycosylation of a therapeutic antibody
.
Angew. Che., Int. Ed.
55
,
2361
2367
106.
Upton
R.
,
Migas
L.G.
,
Pacholarz
K.J.
,
Beniston
R.G.
,
Estdale
S.
,
Firth
D.
et al.
(
2019
)
Hybrid mass spectrometry methods reveal lot-to-lot differences and delineate the effects of glycosylation on the tertiary structure of Herceptin®
.
Chem. Sci.
10
,
2811
2820
[PubMed]
107.
Hansen
K.
,
Lau
A.M.
,
Giles
K.
,
McDonnell
J.M.
,
Struwe
W.B.
,
Sutton
B.J.
et al.
(
2018
)
A mass-spectrometry-based modelling workflow for accurate prediction of IgG antibody conformations in the gas phase
.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
57
,
17194
17199
108.
Devine
P.W.A.
,
Fisher
H.C.
,
Calabrese
A.N.
,
Whelan
F.
,
Higazi
D.R.
,
Potts
J.R.
et al.
(
2017
)
Investigating the structural compaction of biomolecules upon transition to the gas-phase using ESI-TWIMS-MS
.
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.
28
,
1855
1862
[PubMed]
109.
Pacholarz
K.J.
,
Porrini
M.
,
Garlish
R.A.
,
Burnley
R.J.
,
Taylor
R.J.
,
Henry
A.J.
et al.
(
2014
)
Dynamics of intact immunoglobulin G explored by drift-tube ion-mobility mass spectrometry and molecular modeling
.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
,
7765
7769
110.
Porrini
M.
,
Rosu
F.
,
Rabin
C.
,
Darré
L.
,
Gómez
H.
,
Orozco
M.
et al.
(
2017
)
Compaction of duplex nucleic acids upon native electrospray mass spectrometry
.
ACS Central Sci.
3
,
454
461
111.
Rolland
A.D.
and
Prell
J.S.
(
2019
)
Computational insights into compaction of gas-phase protein and protein complex ions in native ion mobility-mass spectrometry
.
Trends Anal. Chem.
116
,
282
291
112.
Rinke
G.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
,
Harnau
L.
,
Albarghash
A.
,
Pauly
M.
and
Kern
K.
(
2014
)
Active conformation control of unfolded proteins by hyperthermal collision with a metal surface
.
Nano Lett.
14
,
5609
5615
[PubMed]
113.
Anggara
K.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Delbianco
M.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
,
Abb
S.
,
Seeberger
P.H.
et al.
(
2020
)
Exploring the molecular conformation space by soft molecule-surface collision
.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
142
,
21420
21427
[PubMed]
114.
Krumbein
L.
,
Anggara
K.
,
Stella
M.
,
Michnowicz
T.
,
Ochner
H.
,
Abb
S.
et al.
(
2021
)
Fast molecular compression by a hyperthermal collision gives bond-selective mechanochemistry
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
126
,
056001
[PubMed]
115.
Latychevskaia
T.
and
Abrahams
J.P.
(
2019
)
Inelastic scattering and solvent scattering reduce dynamical diffraction in biological crystals
.
Acta Crystallogr. B: Struct. Sci. Crystal Eng. Mater.
75
,
523
531
116.
Cowtan
K.
(
2003
)
Phase problem in X-ray crystallography, and its solution
.
eLS
117.
Harrison
R.W.
(
1993
)
Phase problem in crystallography
.
J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A
10
,
1046
1055
118.
Taylor
G.
(
2003
)
The phase problem
.
Acta Crystallogr. D
59
,
1881
1890
119.
Latychevskaia
T.
and
Fink
H.-W.
(
2007
)
Solution to the twin image problem in holography
.
Phys. Rev. Lett.
98
,
233901
[PubMed]
120.
Ochner
H.
,
Szilagyi
S.
,
Edte
M.
,
Malavolti
L.
,
Rauschenbach
S.
and
Kern
K.
(
2022
)
Phase reconstruction of low-energy electron holograms of individual proteins
.
ACS Nano
16
,
18568
18578
[PubMed]
121.
Livadaru
L.
,
Mutus
J.
and
Wolkow
R.A.
(
2011
)
Limits of elemental contrast by low energy electron point source holography
.
J. Appl. Phys.
110
,
094305
This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).